MOOC-Based Mixed Teaching Research on Microcomputer Principle Courses in Colleges and Universities

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 299)


With the rise of MOOC teaching mode, the hybrid teaching mode which combines online teaching and traditional teaching has drawn extensive attention. Based on the analysis of MOOC teaching mode, this paper synthetically compares the advantages and disadvantages of MOOC teaching mode with traditional teaching mode. Taking the microcomputer principle course set up by our electronic information engineering specialty as an example, this paper constructs a teaching platform based on MOOC and solves the problems of traditional teaching Middle school students lack of learning initiative, learning resources can not be fully utilized and other issues, have some referencet to reform of mixed teaching in colleges and universities.


MOOC Microcomputer principle teaching Mixed teaching reform 



This work was supported by Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities scientific research project grant No. NMDYB19066.


  1. 1.
    Eberlein, E., Keller, U.: Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Bernoulli 1(3), 281–299 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hao, D.: Literature analysis of the current MOOC research. China Distance Educ. (21), 42–50 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watted, A., Barak, M.: Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. Internet Higher Educ. 37, 11–20 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, X., Wang, D.M.: MOOC development history and main characteristics analysis. Modern Educ. Technol. 23(11), 5–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, Y.Y.: The impact of MOOCs on higher education in China and countermeasures. J. Hebei Normal Univ. (Educ. Sci. Ed.) (2), 116–121 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, J.H., Wu, Z.J.: MOOC-based college English flip classroom teaching model. Foreign Lang. Teach. (6), 40–45 (2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sneddon, J., Barlow, G., Bradley, S., et al.: Development and impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) for antimicrobial stewardship. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73(4), 1091 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng, H.Z., Li, M.G.: Discussion on the problems in the development of mu’mu. Sci. Technol. Innov. Herald (19), 212–213 (2013). Application. Open Education Research, 11 (b08), 46–49 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, Y., Jia, Y.Z.: MOOC to SPOC - an academic dialogue based on MOOC practice at UC berkeley and tsinghua university. Modern Distance Educ. Res. (4), 13–21 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu, T.Z., Zheng, J.P.: Strategies of university libraries in coping with MOOC challenges. Acad. Libr. Trib. 32(1), 20–24 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou, J.X., Zhou, Y.R.: Mixed teaching model in MOOC era. Educ. Sci. China (15), 71–74 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, R., Yu, H.M.: MOOC based C programming language teaching ideas. Softw. Eng. (3), 60–61 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagano, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Fujita, Y., et al.: A differentiable gaussian-like distribution on hyperbolic space for gradient-based learning (2019)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Volkovicha, V.A., Griffiths, T.R., Thied, R.C., et al.: Behavior of molybdenum in pyrochemical reprocessing: a spectroscopic study of the chlorination of molybdenum and its oxides in chloride melts. J. Nucl. Mater. 323(1), 93–100 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schweizer, B.: Confessions of an unreconstructed MOOC(h)er. Thought Action, 29 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brita-Paja, J.L., Gregorio, C., Llana, L., et al.: Introducing MOOC-like methodologies in a face-to-face undergraduate course: a detailed case study. Interact. Learn. Environ. (8), 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis, D., Kizilcec, R.F., Hauff, C., et al.: The half-life of MOOC knowledge: a randomized trial evaluating knowledge retention and retrieval practice in MOOCs. In: The 8th International Conference (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shapiro, H.B., Lee, C.H., Roth, N.E.W., et al.: Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: an examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Comput. Educ. 110(C), 35–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swinnerton, B.J., Morris, N.P., Hotchkiss, S., et al.: The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum. Anat. Sci. Educ. 10(1), 53–67 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao, Y., Davis, D., Chen, G., et al.: Certificate achievement unlocked: how does MOOC learners’ behaviour change? In: Adjunct Publication of the Conference (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics and Electronic InformationInner Mongolia University for NationalitiesTongliaoChina

Personalised recommendations