Body Composition in Athletes: History, Methodology and Computational Prospects

  • Sergey G. RudnevEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1028)


In this work, current methodology and state of body composition studies in athletes are described. Computer science-related issues and prospects of body composition research are outlined, including that of data collection, comparability, utilization, and management.


Body composition Sport Athletes Computer science 



This work was supported by the RFBR grant no. 18-59-94015.


  1. Anisimova, A.V., Godina, E.Z., Nikolaev, D.V., Rudnev, S.G.: Evaluation of the Heath-Carter somatotype revisited: new bioimpedance equations for children and adolescents. In: Simini, F., Bertemes-Filho, P. (eds.) IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 54, pp. 80–83. Springer, Singapore-Heidelberg (2016)Google Scholar
  2. Bashkirov, P.N., Lutovinova, N.Yu., Utkina, M.I., Chtetsov, V.P.: Body Structure and Sport. Moscow University Press, Moscow (1968). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Bosy-Westphal, A., Danielzik, S., Dörhöfer, R.-P., et al.: Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 30(4), 309–316 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campa, F., Gatterer, H., Lukaski, H., Toselli, S.: Stabilizing bioimpedance-vector-analysis measures with a 10-minute cold shower after running exercise to enable assessment of body hydration. Int. J. Sports. Physiol. Perform. 14(7), 1006–1009 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, J.E.L.: Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes. Karger, Basel (1982)Google Scholar
  6. Carter, J.E.L., Heath, B.H.: Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  7. Chumlea, W.C., Guo, S.S., Kuczmarski, R.J., et al.: Body composition estimates from NHANES III bioelectrical impedance data. Int. J. Obes. 26(12), 1596–1609 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, T.J., Green, P.J.: Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat. Med. 11(10), 1305–1319 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danilov, A.A., Rudnev, S.G., Vassilevski, Y.V.: Numerical basics of bioimpedance measurements. In: Simini, F., Bertemes-Filho, P. (eds.) Bioimpedance in Biomedical Applications and Research, pp. 117–135. Springer, New York (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du, H., Li, L., Whitlock, G., et al.: Patterns and socio-demographic correlates of domain-specific physical activities and their associations with adiposity in the China Kadoorie Biobank study. BMC Public Health 14, 826 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franssen, F.M., Rutten, E.P., Groenen, M.T., et al.: New reference values for body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the general population: results from the UK Biobank. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 15(448), e1–e6 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. Hall, K.D.: Computational model of in vivo human energy metabolism during semistarvation and refeeding. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 291(1), E23–E37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heymsfield, S.B., Lohman, T.G., Wang, Z., Going, S.B. (eds.): Human body Composition, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (2005)Google Scholar
  14. Kandel, M.: Body shape vs body composition as predictor on Ironman race performance. Int. J. Sports Phys. Edu. 3(3), 9–15 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. Koepke, N., Zwahlen, M., Wells, J.C., et al.: Comparison of 3D laser-based photonic scans and manual anthropometric measurements of body size and shape in a validation study of 123 young Swiss men. PeerJ 5, e2980 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolesnikov, V.A., Rudnev, S.G., Nikolaev, D.V., et al.: On a new protocol of the Heath-Carter somatotype assessment using software for body composition bioimpedance analyzer. Moscow Univ. Anthropol. Bull. 4, 4–13 (2016). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Lukaski, H.C. (ed.): Body Composition: Health and Performance in Exercise and Sport. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)Google Scholar
  18. Manore, M.M.: Weight management for athletes and active individuals: a brief review. Sports Med. 45(Suppl. 1), S83–S92 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marfell-Jones, M.J., Stewart, A.D., De Ridder, J.H.: International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, Wellington (2012)Google Scholar
  20. Matias, C.N., Santos, D.A., Júdice, P.B., et al.: Estimation of total body water and extracellular water with bioimpedance in athletes: a need for athlete-specific prediction models. Clin. Nutr. 35(2), 468–474 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matiegka, J.: The testing of physical efficiency. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 4(3), 223–230 (1921)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moon, J.R.: Body composition in athletes and sports nutrition: an examination of the bioimpedance analysis technique. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 67(Suppl. 1), S54–S59 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nana, A., Slater, G.J., Stewart, A.D., Burke, L.M.: Methodology review: using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of body composition in athletes and active people. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 25(2), 198–215 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nickerson, B.S., Esco, M.R., Welborn, B.A., et al.: Time course toward baseline of hand-to-foot BIA measures following an acute bout of aerobic exercise. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 11(2), 640–647 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. NIH: Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64(Suppl. 3), 524S–532S (1996)Google Scholar
  26. Olds, T.S.: One million skinfolds: secular trends in the fatness of young people 1951–2004. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 63(8), 934–946 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostojic, S.M.: Estimation of body fat in athletes: skinfolds vs bioelectrical impedance. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 46(3), 442–446 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. Plank, L.D.: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 8(3), 305–309 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudnev, S.G., Soboleva, N.P., Sterlikov, S.A., et al.: Bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in the Russian population. Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics, Moscow (2014). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Santos, D.A., Dawson, J.A., Matias, C.N., et al.: Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. PLoS ONE 9(5), e97846 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santos, D.A., Silva, A.M., Matias, C.N., et al.: Accuracy of DXA in estimating body composition changes in elite athletes using a four compartment model as the reference method. Nutr. Metab. 7, 22 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Selinger, A.: The body as a three component system. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (1977)Google Scholar
  33. Silva, A.M.: Structural and functional body components in athletic health and performance phenotypes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 215–224 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silva, A.M., Matias, C.N., Nunes, C.L., et al.: Lack of agreement of in vivo raw bioimpedance measurements obtained from two single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance devices. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73(3), 1077–1083 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sindeyeva, L.V., Rudnev, S.G.: Age- and sex-related variability of the Heath-Carter somatotype in adults and possibility of its bioimpedance assessment (as exemplified by the Russian population of Eastern Siberia). Morfologia 151(1), 77–87 (2017). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  36. Siri, W.E.: Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek, J., Henschel, A. (eds.) Techniques of Measuring Body Composition, pp. 223–234. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington (1961)Google Scholar
  37. Stewart, A.D., Sutton, L.: Body Composition in Sport, Exercise and Health. Routledge, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tanner, J.M.: The Physique of the Olympic Athlete. Allen and Unwin, London (1964)Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, D.A., Cain, D.L., Clark, N.W.: Validity and reliability of A-mode ultrasound for body composition assessment of NCAA division I athletes. PLoS ONE 11(4), e0153146 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, Z.M., Pierson, R.N., Heymsfield, S.B.: The five-level model: a new approach to organizing body-composition research. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 56(1), 19–28 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marchuk Institute of Numerical MathematicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and InformaticsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations