Advertisement

An Equity-Based Incentive Mechanism for Decentralized Virtual World Content Storage

  • Bingqing Shen
  • Jingzhi GuoEmail author
  • Weiming Tan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 41)

Abstract

Virtual worlds have become the arena for many entertainment, social, and business activities and provided a platform for user content generation. To protect user innovation, persistency is an important property. Unfortunately, existing virtual worlds, owned by some entities, are not immune from death due to entity failure. To provide a persistent virtual world, a decentralized architecture is explored, which is constructed on user contributed devices. However, there are many challenges to realize a decentralized virtual world. One important issue is user cooperation in reliable content storage. The devices contributed by users may not be reliable for maintaining all user contents, but users do not have the incentive to provide reliable devices for others. This paper addresses the issue by two steps. First, an indicator is provided to users, called replica group reliability which is based on the proposed replicability index. Based on the indicator, users can learn the reliability of their content storage. Then, a new user incentive mechanism, called equity-based node allocation strategy, is proposed to promote user cooperation to collectively maintain reliable content storage. A decentralized algorithm implementing the strategy is designed and the evaluation results show its effectiveness and efficiency.

Keywords

Virtual world Persistency Replication Incentive Cooperation Reliability 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is partially supported by the University of Macau Research Grant No. MYRG2017-00091-FST.

References

  1. 1.
    Dionisio, J.D.N., Gilbert, R.: 3D virtual worlds and the Metaverse: current status and future possibilities. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 45(3), 34 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tredinnick, L.: Virtual realities in the business world. Bus. Inf. Rev. 35(1), 39–42 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poppe, E., Brown, R., Recker, J., Johnson, D., Vanderfeesten, I.: Design and evaluation of virtual environments mechanisms to support remote collaboration on complex process diagrams. Inf. Syst. 66, 59–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou, M., Leenders, M.A., Cong, L.M.: Ownership in the virtual world and the implications for long-term user innovation success. Technovation (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shen, B., Guo, J., Li, L.X.: Cost optimization in persistent virtual world design. Inf. Technol. Manage. 19(3), 155–169 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lua, E.K., Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., Lim, S.: A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 7(1–4), 72–93 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adams, J.S.: Towards an understanding of inequity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67(5), 422 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Austin, W., Walster, E.: Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 30(2), 208 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krishnan, R., Smith, M.D., Telang, R.: The economics of peer-to-peer networks. Available at SSRN 504062 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adar, E., Huberman, B.A.: Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday 5(10) (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 1(3), 243–253 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oualha, N., Roudier, Y.: Peer-to-Peer Storage: Security and Protocols. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, W., Peng, D., Lin, C., Chen, Z., Song, J.: Enhancing tit-for-tat for incentive in BitTorrent networks. Peer-to-peer Network. Appl. 3(1), 27–35 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lillibridge, M., Elnikety, S., Birrell, A., Burrows, M., Isard, M.: A cooperative internet backup scheme. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, p. 3. USENIX Association, June 2003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen, H., Lin, Y., Li, Z.: Refining reputation to truly select high-QoS servers in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(12), 2439–2450 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oualha, N., Roudier, Y.: Securing P2P storage with a self-organizing payment scheme. In: Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous Security, pp. 155–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vishnumurthy, V., Chandrakumar, S., Sirer, E.G.: Karma: a secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing. In: Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-peer Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, June 2003Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams, J.S.: Inequity in social exchange. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 267–299. Academic Press (1965)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Messe, L.A., Dawson, J.E., Lane, I.M.: Equity as a mediator of the effect of reward level on behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 26(1), 60 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radinsky, T.L.: Equity and inequity as a source of reward and punishment. Psychon. Sci. 15(6), 293–295 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wicker, A.W., Bushweiler, G.: Perceived fairness and pleasantness of social exchange situations: two factorial studies of inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 15(1), 63 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmitt, D.R., Marwell, G.: Withdrawal and reward reallocation as responses to inequity. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 8(3), 207–221 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Donald, E.K.: The art of computer programming. Sorting Searching 3, 426–458 (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knoll, M., Wacker, A., Schiele, G., Weis, T.: Bootstrapping in peer-to-peer systems. In: 2008 14th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp. 271–278. IEEE, December 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of MacauTaipaMacao, Special Administrative Region of China

Personalised recommendations