Comparison of the Airline Networks of India with ANI Based on Network Parameters

  • Dimpee BaruahEmail author
  • Ankur Bharali
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11941)


Transportation systems play an important role in maintaining the balance of modern civilization. Among them, one of the essential transport systems is air transportation system. So the study and proper maintenance of the air transportation network, either domestic or global, prove to be very much essential. The present paper provides an analysis of three major airline networks of India viz. Indigo, Jet Airways, and Air India from the perspectives of structure and robustness. The study is done by adopting complex network approach. A comparison of these three major airlines with Airport Network of India (ANI) based on some network parameters is also analysed.


Airline network Robustness Complex network Network parameters ANI 


  1. 1.
    Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L.: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378–382 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagler, G.: Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network. Phys. A 387(12), 2972–2980 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bharali, A., Baruah, D.: On structure and robustness of airport network of India. Res. Rev.: Discret. Math. Struct. 5(2), 26–33 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Couto, G.S., Couto Da Silva, A.P., Ruiz, L.B., Benevenuto, F.: Structural properties of the Brazilian air transportation network. Ann. Brazil Acad. Sci. 87(3), 1653–1674 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman, L.: Centrality in social networks conceptual classification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215–239 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gribble, S.: Robustness in complex systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operation Systems (Hot OS-VIII) (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, D.D., Qian, J.H., Liu, J.G.: Network topology and correlation features affiliated with European airline companies. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 388(1), 71–81 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hossain, M., Alam, S., Rees, T., Abbass, H.: Australian airport network robustness analysis: a complex network approach. In: Proceedings of Australasian Transport Research Forum, pp. 1–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chi, L.-P., et al.: Structural properties of US flight network. Chin. Phys. Lett. 20(8), 1393–1396 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, W., Cai, X.: Statistical analysis of airport network of China. Phys. Rev. E 69(4), 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lordan, O., Sallan, J.M., Simo, P., Gonzalez-Prieto, D.: Robustness of airline alliance route networks. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 22(1–3), 587–595 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reggiani, A., Signoretti, S., Nijkamp, P., Cento, A.: Network measures in civil air transport: a case study of Lufthansa. In: Naimzada, A.K., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds.) Networks, Topology and Dynamics. LNE, pp. 257–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, P., Cento, A.: Connectivity and concentration in airline networks: a complexity analysis of Lufthansa network. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 449–461 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tizghadam, A., Leon-Garcia, A.: On robust traffic engineering in core networks. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, IEEE GLOBECOM, pp. 1–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wijdeveld, S.J.: Airline and alliance networks topology and robustness from a complex network approach. Master thesis (2015). Accessed 31 Aug 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsDibrugarh UniversityDibrugarhIndia

Personalised recommendations