Advertisement

Detection of Handwritten Document Forgery by Analyzing Writers’ Handwritings

  • Priyanka RoyEmail author
  • Soumen Bag
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11941)

Abstract

Since digitization is yet to be adopted globally, handwritten documents are still in use in many places. Handwritten documents are prone to get forged thanks to acts like the versatility of tampering which are very frequent among skilful fraudsters. Our research work focuses on one of the major problems to detect whether a document is treated as false or not based on an analysis of the handwriting of the content writers. Mostly, legal documents are scripted authentically by a single person. If the content is a combination of more than one person, then it will be treated like a forged document. The proposed work is formulated as a binary classification problem. Various contour related sliding window based features are extracted from word images of the corresponding handwritten document. The same writer with different handwriting styles are also considered here as well. Bagging meta-classifier is trained for classification of the extracted features. The accuracy of this proposed work is \(89.64\%\) on IAM dataset is quite sound. We have also tested our method on IDRBT check image dataset. However, since there is a lack of direct implementation on this particular problem we could not make a comparative analysis of the proposed method.

Keywords

Bagging Contour based feature Forged document Handwritten document 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work is sponsored by the project “Design and Implementation of Multiple Strategies to Identify Handwritten Forgery Activities in Legal Documents” (No. ECR/2016/001251, Dt.16.03.2017), SERB, Govt. of India.

References

  1. 1.
    IDRBT Cheque Image Dataset. http://www.idrbt.ac.in/icid.html
  2. 2.
    Awaida, M.S.: Text independent writer identification of Arabic manuscripts and the effects of writers increase. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Analysis Applications (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bensefia, A., Paquet, T.: Writer verification based on a single handwriting word samples. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 34(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brink, A.A., Smit, J., Bulacu, M.L., Schomaker, L.R.B.: Writer identification using directional ink-trace width measurements. Pattern Recogn. 45, 162–171 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Z., Yu, H., X., Wu, A., Zheng. W.S.: Letter-level writer identification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pp. 381–388 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christlein, V., Gropp, M., Fiel, S., Maier, A.: Unsupervised feature learning for writer identification and writer retrieval. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 991–997 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dansena, P., Bag, S., Pal, R.: Differentiating pen inks in handwritten bank cheques using multi-layer perceptron. In: Shankar, B.U., Ghosh, K., Mandal, D.P., Ray, S.S., Zhang, D., Pal, S.K. (eds.) PReMI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10597, pp. 655–663. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69900-4_83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiel, S., Sablatnig, R.: Writer retrieval and writer identification using local features. In: Proceedings of the IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, pp. 145–149 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, S., Schomaker, L.: Writer identification using curvature-free features. Pattern Recogn. 63, 451–464 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosoe, M., Yamada, T., Kato, K., Yamamoto, K.: Offline text-independent writer identification based on writer-independent model using conditional autoencoder. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, pp. 441–446 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(1), 62–66 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy, P., Bag, S.: Identification of fraudulent alteration by similar pen ink in handwritten bank cheque. In: Chaudhuri, B.B., Nakagawa, M., Khanna, P., Kumar, S. (eds.) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing. AISC, vol. 1024, pp. 183–195. Springer, Singapore (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9291-8_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rutter, J., W.: Geometry of crves (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang, T., Wu, X., Bu, W.: Offline text-independent writer identification using stroke fragment and contour based features. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biometrics, pp. 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wadhwa, A., Meheshwari, M., Dansena, P., Bag, S.: Geometrical and structural features for forensics in handwritten bank cheques. In: Proceedings of the IEEE India Council International Conference (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology, (Indian School of Mine)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations