Gas Turbine Design at Rolls-Royce – Exploring the Limitations of a Systems Engineering Approach
The development of a civil aerospace gas turbine engine within the required timescale and resource constraints presents a considerable challenge. How does a team of hundreds of engineers organize itself, not just to design the thousands of high technology components required, but to manage their interactions in order to ensure that the engine operates according to customer expectations and continues to function safely even in the event of a malfunction? In organizing the work, some elements map onto established systems principles, fitting well the model of a functional system. Other elements map less well and present a challenge to current thinking, which this paper explores.
UK Origin MaterialExport Control Classification: Not Export Controlled
All endeavours at Rolls-Royce including this paper are a result of teamwork. The contributions of many colleagues with whom the authors have discussed the concepts described here are hereby gratefully acknowledged. As is apparent from multiple references, the Systems Engineering approach at Rolls-Royce draws heavily upon training material developed by Stuart Burge of Burge Hughes Walsh.
- 1.Whurr, J., Beecroft, P.: Rolls-Royce’s long term civil aircraft propulsion system concept and technology strategy. In: International Society of Air-breathing Engines Conference 2017, Manchester, UK, 3 to 8 September 2018Google Scholar
- 2.Burge, S.: The Systems Engineering Tool Box. Context Diagram (CD). https://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/Uploaded/1/Documents/Context-Diagram-Tool-Draft-2.pdf
- 3.Burge, S.: The Systems Engineering Tool Box. Functional Modelling (FM). https://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/Uploaded/1/Documents/Functional-Modelling-Tool-Draft-2.pdf
- 4.Burge, S.: The Systems Engineering Tool Box. Functional Failures Modes and Effects Analysis (FFMEA). https://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/Uploaded/1/Documents/FFMEA-Tool-v2.pdf
- 5.SAE. ARP 4754A. Aerospace Recommended Practice 4754 Rev A, December 2010Google Scholar