Implementing and Managing a Mastery Learning Program
- 30 Downloads
A rigorous education intervention cannot succeed without well-planned implementation and careful ongoing management. Specific steps needed to achieve education and translational science goals include (a) planning for mastery learning, (b) pilot testing, (c) implementation, and (d) continuous management. Successful mastery learning programs rely on numerous resources. Planning for implementation includes obtaining resources such as space, time, supplies, equipment, and faculty. Pilot testing ensures that scenarios and assessment tools are refined and accurate. Implementation requires highly engaged faculty and learners who complete rigorous deliberate practice with individualized performance feedback. During outcome assessment, predetermined outcome measures are evaluated. Finally, ongoing management is necessary for mastery learning programs that may undergo periodic revision based on feedback and reaching education and clinical outcomes. When planning for dissemination, understanding culture, setting, and the downstream collateral impact of a mastery learning program is critical.
This chapter discusses the execution and management of mastery learning programs. We highlight specific examples that illustrate barriers and facilitators including faculty time, materials, scheduling logistics, data collection, and follow-up.
KeywordsImplementation Mastery learning Pilot testing Study management
- 2.Thompson LL. Making the team: a guide for managers. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Education; 2016.Google Scholar
- 3.Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, et al. The making of a dream team: when expert teams do best. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 4.McGaghie WC, Pugh CM, Wayne DB. Fundamentals of educational research using clinical simulation. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering, and management. Burlington: Academic Press; 2008.Google Scholar
- 5.Stagl KC, Salas E, Burke CS. Best practices in team leadership: what team leaders do to facilitate team effectiveness. In: Conger J, Riggio R, editors. The practice of leadership: developing the next generation of leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.Google Scholar
- 7.Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Vozenilek JA, O’Connor L, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves paracentesis skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(1):23–7.Google Scholar
- 13.Butter J, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Kaye M, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(8):780–5.Google Scholar
- 14.Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Simuni T, Caprio T, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves residents’ lumbar puncture skills. Neurology. 2012;79(2):132–7.Google Scholar
- 15.Szmuilowicz E, Neeley KJ, Sharma RK, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Improving residents’ code status discussion skills: a randomized trial. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(7):768–74.Google Scholar
- 26.Miami Group. UMedic user manual. Miami: Gordon Center for Research in Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; 2008.Google Scholar
- 27.Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Handbook of test development. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum; 2006.Google Scholar
- 28.Stufflebeam DL. The checklists development checklist. 2000. Available at: https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/guidelines_cdc.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
- 29.Adler MD, Vozenilek JA, Trainor JK, et al. Comparison of checklist and anchored global rating instruments for performance rating of simulated pediatric emergencies. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(1):18–24.Google Scholar
- 34.International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2005;112(Suppl III):III-1-136. [Context Link].Google Scholar
- 35.Proceedings of the 2005 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation. 2005;67:157–341.Google Scholar
- 36.Wayne DB, Nitzberg M, Reddy S, et al. Advanced cardiac life support checklists for simulation-based education. MedEdPORTAL. 2014. Available at: https://www.mededportal.org/publication/9697/. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
- 37.Robbins S. Organizational behavior. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2003.Google Scholar
- 38.Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 39.Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962.Google Scholar
- 42.Glasgow RE. The REAIM model. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.Google Scholar
- 44.Cameron KA, Cohen ER, Hertz JR, Wayne DB, Mitra D, Barsuk JH. Barriers and facilitators to central venous catheter insertion: a qualitative study. J Patient Saf. 2018. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 45.Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Hertz JR, et al. Healthcare providers’ awareness and understanding of competency requirements for central venous catheter insertion. AMEE MedEDPublish. 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000012.1.
- 46.Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Potts S, et al. Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):749–56.Google Scholar