Advertisement

Mathematical Problem-Solving Visualised in Outdoor Activities

  • Magni Hope LossiusEmail author
  • Torbjørn Lundhaug
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss characteristics of problem-solving situations in outdoor activities considered as mathematical. Although kindergarten children often participate in outdoor activities, these activities are rarely considered as being mathematical. We use theories about instrumental and pedagogical situations in kindergarten to identify the kinds of problem-solving that is occurring and how mathematics comes to play in these situations. We analyse one spontaneous episode in an outdoor setting to gain a better understanding of mathematical problem-solving in outdoor activities. Our findings indicate that although the children only used mathematics implicitly as a tool to solve a practical task in the outdoor environment, the kindergarten teacher was able to support their understanding of the mathematical ideas. This indicates that the teacher had a pedagogical purpose when contributing to the interaction. We argue that awareness of the features of mathematical problem-solving could support kindergarten teachers to be able to support and develop mathematical problem- solving in the outdoor environment.

Keywords

Mathematical problem-solving Outdoor environment Children-initiated activities Kindergarten teacher support Kindergarten 

References

  1. Bush, H. (2009). Assessing children’s understanding of length measurement: A focus on three key concepts. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 14(4), 29.Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, T. P., Ansell, E., Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Weisbeck, L. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children’s problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 428–441.Google Scholar
  3. Charlesworth, R., & Leali, S. A. (2012). Using problem solving to assess young children’s mathematics knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(6), 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copley, J. V. (2010). The young child and mathematics (NAEYC (Series)) (Vol. 167, 2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  5. Delacour, L. (2016). Mathematics and didactic contract in Swedish preschools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engel, A., Barnett, W. S., Anders, Y., & Taguma, M. (2015). Early childhood education and care policy review. Norway, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  7. English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education (pp. 263–290). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helenius, O., Johansson, M. L., Lange, T., Meaney, T., Riesbeck, E., & Wernberg, A. (2015). Analysing instrumental and pedagogic situations in preschools using the didaktic space. In O. Helenius, A. Engström, T. Meaney, P. Nilsson, E. Norén, et al. (Eds.), Development of mathematics teaching: design, scale, effects. Proceedings from Madif9 (pp. 57–66). Linköping, Sweden: SMDF. Retrieved from: http://ncm.gu.se/media/smdf/Published/No10_Madif9/057066-Helenius_ etal_A.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. Helenius, O., Johansson, M. L., Lange, T., Meaney, T., & Wernberg, A. (2016). Measuring temperature within the didaktic space of preschool. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 155–176.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobbe, T. (2007). Connecting research to teaching: Using Polya to overcome translation difficulties. Mathematics Teacher, 101(5), 390–393.Google Scholar
  11. Kaarby, K. M. E., & Tandberg, C. (2017). The belief in outdoor play and learning. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12, 25–36.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, S. (2012). Toddlers as mathematicians? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  14. Lossius, M. H. (2012). Bildenes betydning -for små barn. [Pictures significance—for small children]. In T. Fosse (Ed.), Rom for matematikk- i barnehagen. [Area for mathematics—in kindergarten]. Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Lysklett, O. B. (2005). Uteleik i kjente omgivelser. [Outdoor play in known environment]. In O. B. Lysklett (Ed.), Ute hele dagen [Outside the hole day] (pp. 15–22). DMMH’s publikasjonsserie nr 1-2005). Trondheim, Norway: Dronning Mauds Minne Høgskole.Google Scholar
  16. Moser, T., & Martinsen, M. (2010). The outdoor environment in Norwegian kindergartens as a pedagogical space for toddlers’ play, learning and development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). Framework Plan for Kindergartens [Rammeplan for barnehagen]. Oslo, Norway: Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
  18. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Framework plan for the content and tasks of Kindergartens [Rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver]. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  19. Pólya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Reprint from 1945). (Expanded ed., Princeton Science Library). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rogers, J. (2004). Autonomy and mathematical problem-solving: The early years. Education, 32(3), 24–31.Google Scholar
  21. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint from 1992). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stabekk, C. (2017). Barnehagedekning før og nå. [Coverage of kindergartens earlier and now]. Oslo, Norway: Statistisk sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
  24. Stanic, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (1989). Historical perspectives on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Vol. 3, pp. 1–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  25. Tarim, K. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zöllner, J., & Benz, C. (2016). “I spy with my little eye”: Children comparing lengths indirectly. In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. L. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM2 conference, 2014 (pp. 359–370). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations