Advertisement

How Do You Perform Human Rights? Measurement, Audit and Power Through Global Indicators

  • Giovanna GilleriEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 77)

Abstract

Over the last few decades, several international actors have actively engaged in developing indicators for measuring states’ and other actors’ commitment to international human rights (HRs) norms. Indicators constitute the evidence of the state of events, activities or outcomes relating to HRs standards. According to mainstream views, HRs indicators strengthen monitoreds’ accountability by translating complex phenomena into easily intelligible data. Common classifications understand such technologies of gauging through standard taxonomies, such as ‘structural’, ‘process’, ‘outcome’, ‘qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’ indicators. Against this framework, this chapter suggests an alternative, tripartite account of the assumptions and consequences underlying the use of HRs metrics. Mauro Bussani’s teachings and perspectives on the interactions between national and supranational legal orders guide the investigation through a comparative and cross-cutting analysis of the intricacies of HRs measurement. First, as instruments of (1) knowledge, the reliability of indicators depends on their responsiveness to the scrutinised context. Secondly, as tools of (2) control, there is little doubt that indicators can be an effective system of auditing. Yet the overemphasis on the supposedly ‘neutral’ and ‘objective’ language of quantification entails many risks, including the empowerment of the epistemic communities designing them. But indicators may also be tools of (3) power: many indicators become influential in the public debate, affect how people think and behave, as well as shape the agendas of domestic and global institutions. The conclusion enshrines a forward-looking approach as to how to overcome existing obstacles by improving stake-holders’ participation within and transparency of the preparation of indicators.

Keywords

Global indicators Human rights Audit Governance 

References

  1. Amariles DR (2015) Legal indicators, global law and legal pluralism: an introduction. J Legal Pluralism Unofficial Law 47(1):9–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1046739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An-Na’im AA (1999) The universality of human rights: an Islamic perspective. In: Ando N (ed) Japan and international law: past, present and future. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 311–325Google Scholar
  3. Bauer JR, Bell D (eds) (1999) The East Asian challenge for human rights. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bussani M (1999) Diritto e geopolitica: Le radici delle diversità. Limes 1:259–268Google Scholar
  5. Bussani M (2005) La diversità, il diritto ed il discorso pubblico. In: Alpa G, Roppo V (eds) Il diritto privato nella società moderna. Jovene, Napoli, pp 203–221Google Scholar
  6. Bussani M (2007) Las diversidades y el derecho. Revista Crítica de Derecho Privado 1:61–79Google Scholar
  7. Bussani M (2009) Noi e gli altri: Gli squilibri del diritto globale. In: Amato G (ed) Governare l’economia globale nella crisi ed oltre la crisi. Passigli, Firenze, pp 279–306Google Scholar
  8. Bussani M (2010a) Il diritto dell’Occidente: Geopolitica delle regole globali. Einaudi, TurinGoogle Scholar
  9. Bussani M (2010b) L’uso imperiale del diritto. Limes 1:1–8Google Scholar
  10. Bussani M (2011) A pluralist approach to mixed jurisdictions. J Comp Law 6:161–168Google Scholar
  11. Bussani M (2012) Democracy and the Western Legal Tradition. In: Bussani M, Mattei U (eds) The Cambridge companion to comparative law. CUP, Cambridge, pp 384–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bussani M (2016) Geopolitics of legal reforms and the role of comparative law. In: Bussani M, Heckendorn Urscheler L (eds) Comparisons in legal development: the impact of foreign and international law on national legal systems. Schulthess, Geneva and Zurich, pp 235–248Google Scholar
  13. Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Merry SE (2012) Introduction: global governance through indicators. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donnelly J (2003) Universal human rights in theory and practice. Cornell University Press, Ithaca-LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlop E (2011) Indications of progress? Assessing the use of indicators in UNHCR operations. UNHCR policy development and evaluation service, research paper 214Google Scholar
  16. Dutta NK (2012) Accountability in the generation of governance indicators. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 437–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterly W (2007) The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Eide A (2001) The use of indicators in the practice of the committee on economic, social and cultural rights. In: Eide A, Krause C, Rosas A (eds) Economic, social and cultural rights. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 545–551Google Scholar
  19. Espel W, Sauder M (2012) The dynamism of indicators. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 86–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filmer-Wilson E (2006) An introduction to the use of human rights indicators for development programming. Neth Q Hum Rights 24(1):155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher A (2012) From diagnosing under-immunization to evaluating health care systems: immunization coverage indicators as a technology of global governance. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 217–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fletcher G (2015) Addressing gender in impact evaluation: a Methods Lab publication. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Frydman B, Twining W (2015) A symposium on global law, legal pluralism and legal indicators. J Legal Pluralism Unofficial Law 47(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1030210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T, Randolph S (2009) An index of economic and social rights fulfilment: concept and methodology. J Hum Rights 8(3):195–221.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830903110194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman R, Jenkins D (2013) Socializing states: promoting human rights through international law. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. Am J Sociol 10(5):1373–1411.  https://doi.org/10.1086/428442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ignatieff M, Desormeau K (2005) Measurement and human rights: introduction. Impact, measurement and human rights: tracking progress, assessing impact. Carr centre project report, pp 1–9. Available at www.projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/carrcenter/files/measurement_2005report.pdf
  28. Infantino M (2012) The law of indicators on women’s human rights: unmet promises and global challenges. IRPA working paper GAL series 9/2012. Available at www.irpa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WP_9_2012_Infantino.pdf
  29. Infantino M (2015a) Comparative law in the global context: exploring the pluralism of human rights indicators. Eur J Comp Law Gov 2:97–123.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00202001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Infantino M (2015b) Human rights indicators across institutional regimes. Int Organ Law Rev 12(1):146–167.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01201006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Infantino M (2016) Global indicators. In: Cassese S (ed) Research handbook on global administrative law. EE, Cheltenham, pp 347–367Google Scholar
  32. Jacobsson B (2000) Standardization and expert knowledge. In: Brunsson N, Jacobsson B (eds) A world of standards. OUP, Oxford, pp 40–49Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy D (1976) Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Rev 89(8):1685–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kingsbury B, Krisch N, Stewart R (2005) The emergence of global administrative law. Law Contemp Probl 68:18–28Google Scholar
  35. Koskenniemi M (1990) The politics of international law. Eur J Int Law 1:4–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koskenniemi M (1997) Hierarchy in international law: a sketch. Eur J Int Law 8:566–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koskenniemi M (1999) The effect of rights on political culture. In: Alston P (ed) The EU and human rights. OUP, Oxford, pp 99–116Google Scholar
  38. Koskenniemi M (2001) The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law 1870–1960. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koskenniemi M (2005) Global legal pluralism: multiple regimes and multiple modes of thought. Keynote speech, Harvard University, 5 Mar 2005. Available at www.helsinki.fi/eci/Publications/Koskenniemi/MKPluralism-Harvard-05d[1].pdf
  40. Koskenniemi M (2006) The fate of public international law: constitutional Utopia or fragmentation?. The Chorley lecture 2006, London School of Economics, 7 Jun 2006Google Scholar
  41. Koskenniemi M (2009) The politics of international law: 20 years later. Eur J Int Law 20(1):7–19.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koskenniemi M (2010) Human rights mainstreaming as a strategy for institutional power. Humanity Int J Hum Rights, Humanitarianism Dev 1(1):47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2010.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krever T (2013) Quantifying law: legal indicator projects and the reproduction of neoliberal common sense. Third World Q 34(1):131–150.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.755014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Landman T (2004) Measuring human rights: principle, practice, and policy. Human Rights Q 26:906–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Landman T, Carvalho E (2010) Measuring human rights. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Langlois AJ (2001) The politics of justice and human rights. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour B (1988) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Liebowitz D, Zwingel S (2014) Gender equality oversimplified: using CEDAW to counter the measurement obsession. Int Stud Rev 16:362–389.  https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Malhotra R, Fasel N (2005) Quantitative human rights indicators: a survey of major initiatives. In: Background paper for the UN expert meeting on human rights indicators. Nordic Network Seminar in Human Rights Research, Åbo-Turku, Finland. 10–13 Mar 2005Google Scholar
  50. Mayer AE (2012) Islam and human rights: tradition and politics. Boulder, WestviewGoogle Scholar
  51. Megill A (1994) Four senses of objectivity. In: Megill A (ed) Rethinking objectivity. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  52. Merry SE (2011) Measuring the world: indicators, human rights, and global governance. Curr Anthropol 52(Supp 3):83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1086/657241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Merry SE (2016) The seductions of quantification: measuring human rights, gender violence and sex trafficking. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelken D (2015) Contesting global indicators. In: Merry SE, Davis K, Kingsbury B (eds) The quiet power of indicators: measuring governance, corruption, and rule of law. CUP, Cambridge, pp 317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2012) Human rights indicators: a guide to measurement and implementation. UN Publications, New York, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  56. OHCHR (2006) Indicators for monitoring compliance with international human rights instruments: a conceptual and methodological framework. UN Doc HRI/MC/2006/7Google Scholar
  57. OHCHR (2008) Using indicators to promote and monitor the implementation of human rights. UN Doc HRI/MC/2008/3Google Scholar
  58. OHCHR (2011) Report of the United Nations high commissioner for human rights to the economic and social council. UN Doc E/2011/90Google Scholar
  59. Poovey M (1998) A history of the modern fact. University of Chicago Press, Chicago-LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porter T (1995) Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  61. Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Prada Uribe MA (2012) Development through data? A case study on the World Bank’s performance indicators and their impact on development in the Global South. IRPA working papers GAL series 5/2012. Available at www.irpa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WP_5_2012_Prada1.pdf
  63. Rittich K (2010) Governing by measuring: the millenium development goals in global governance. In: Ruiz-Fabri H, Wolfrum R, Gogolin J (eds) Select proceedings of the European society of international law. Hart, Oxford, pp 463–487Google Scholar
  64. Rosga AJ, Satterthwaite ML (2009) The trust in indicators: measuring human rights. Berkeley J Int Law 27:253–315.  https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38G07RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosga AJ, Satterthwaite ML (2012) Measuring human rights: UN indicators in critical perspective. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sano H-O (2005) Human rights indicators: purpose and validity. Paper presented at the UN expert meeting on human rights indicators, Nordic network seminar in human rights research, Åbo-Turku, Finland, 10–13 Mar 2005Google Scholar
  67. Satterthwaite M (2012) Measuring human rights: indicators, expertise and evidence-based practice. Proc Annu Meet Am Soc Int Law 106:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Satterthwaite M (2016) Coding personal integrity rights: law, advocacy, and standards-based measures of human rights. NYU J Int Law Polit 48:513–579Google Scholar
  69. Simmons B (2009) Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Strathern M (1996) From improvement to enhancement: an anthropological comment on the audit culture. Camb Anthropol 19:1–21Google Scholar
  71. The Carr Center for Human Rights Policy (2005) Measurement and human rights: tracking progress, assessing impact. Project report. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  72. Türk D (1990) Realization of economic, social and cultural rights: first progress report. UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/19Google Scholar
  73. United Nations (UN) (2003) Report of the special rapporteur of the commission on human rights on the right of everyone to enjoy the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Paul Hunt). UN Doc A/58/427Google Scholar
  74. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1992) Human development report 1992. OUP, Oxford, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Urueña R (2012) Internally displaced population in Colombia: a case study on the domestic aspects of indicators as technologies of global governance. In: Davis KE, Kingsbury B, Fisher A, Merry SE (eds) Governance by indicators: global power through quantification and rankings. OUP, Oxford, pp 249–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Urueña R (2015) Indicators as political spaces: law, international organizations, and the quantitative challenge in global governance. Int Organ Law Rev 12(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01201001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Welling JV (2008) International indicators and economic, social, and cultural rights. Human Rights Q 30(4):933–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European University InstituteFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations