Advertisement

The Generalized ANOVA: A Classic Song Sung with Modern Lyrics

  • Hui ZhangEmail author
  • Xin Tu
Chapter
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The widely used analysis of variance (ANOVA) suffers from a series of flaws that not only raise questions about conclusions drawn from its use, but also undercut its many potential applications to modern clinical and observational research. In this paper, we propose a generalized ANOVA model to address the limitations of this popular approach so that it can be applied to many immediate as well as potential applications ranging from an age-old technical issue in applying ANOVA to cutting-edge methodological challenges. By integrating the classic theory of U-statistics, we develop distribution-free inference for this new class of models to address missing data for longitudinal clinical trials and cohort studies.

Keywords

Count response Missing data Overdispersion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Dr. W. Jack Hall and Ms. Cheryl Bliss-Clark at the University of Rochester for their help to improve the presentation of the manuscript. This paper was also supported by the ASA Best Student Paper Award and ENAR Distinguished Student Paper Award to be presented at the 2009 JSM in Washington and 2010 ENAR Spring Meeting in New Orleans, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Clarke, G. N. (1995). Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: Methodological issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 718–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duran, B. S. (1976). A survey of nonparametric tests for scale. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 5, 1287–1312.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoeffding, W. (1948). A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 293–325.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogarty, G. E., Schooler, N. R., & Baker, R. W. (1997). Efficacy versus effectiveness. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kowalski, J., & Tu, X. M. (2007). Modern applied U-statistics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 583–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu, N., Tang, W., He, H., Yu, Q., Crits-Christoph, P., Hui, Z., et al. (2009). On the impact of parametric assumptions and robust alternatives for longitudinal data analysis. Biometrical Journal, 51, 627–643.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Randles, R. H., & Wolfe, D. A. (1979). Introduction to the theory of nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., & Zhao, L. P. (1995). Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 106–121.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serfling, R. J. (1980). Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taube, C. A., Mechanic, D., & Hohmann, A. A. (1989). The future of mental health services research. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics, 1, 80–83.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, H., & Tu, X. M. (2011). Generalized ANOVA for concurrently modeling mean and variance within a longitudinal data setting. Technical Report, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Feinberg School of MedicineNorth Western University ChicagoILUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsUC San Diego School of MedicineCAUSA

Personalised recommendations