Advertisement

Analytical Design of Clinical Cases for Educational Games

  • Marcos Felipe de Menezes MotaEmail author
  • Fagner Leal Pantoja
  • Matheus Silva Mota
  • Tiago de Araujo Guerra Grangeia
  • Marco Antonio de Carvalho Filho
  • André Santanchè
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11863)

Abstract

Preparing medical students to provide emergency care is one of the biggest challenges in health education, as novices must articulate a wide spectrum, ever-growing knowledge of a generalist physician in the shortest possible time. Previous experience has shown that a problem-based e-Learning environment, presenting clinical cases to be solved by students, has several benefits in the learning process. This paper describes the design and development of an approach to produce health learning games. The approach focuses on combining student engagement with realistic narratives. The central component is a narrative scripting language that enables rapid prototyping and integration with a data analysis backed authoring process. Our method has been materialized in an educational game authoring environment that allows the creation of complex cases and automatic generation of simpler ones. The analytical design provides a scalable method to create medical learning experiences based on well-defined medical education theories and health data.

Keywords

Health education e-Learning Serious games 

References

  1. 1.
    Bremner, M.N., Aduddell, K., Bennett, D.N., VanGeest, J.B.: The use of human patient simulators: best practices with novice nursing students. Nurse Educ. 31(4), 170–174 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook, D.A., Triola, M.M.: Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med. Educ. 43(4), 303–311 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flexner, A.: Medical education in the united states and canada: a report to the Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. Technical report, New York (1910). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12163926
  4. 4.
    Frasca, G.: Simulation versus narrative: introduction to ludology. In: The Video Game Theory Reader, chap. 10, pp. 243–258. Routledge, New York, October 2013.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700457-17
  5. 5.
    Frenk, J., et al.: Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376(9756), 1923–1958 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21112623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grangeia, T.D.A.G., et al.: Cognitive load and self-determination theories applied to e-learning: impact on students’ participation and academic performance. PLOS ONE 11(3), e0152462 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152462, http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kassirer, J.P.: Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Acad. Med. 85(7), 1118–1124 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d, https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001888-201007000-00011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynch, S., Hargood, C., Charles, F.: Textual authoring for interactive narrative (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mislevy, R.J., et al.: Psychometrics and game-based assessment. In: Technology and Testing: Improving Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp. 23–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neville, A.J.: Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. A review of its effects on knowledge and clinical performance. Med. Princ. Pract. 18(1), 1–9 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1159/000163038, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19060483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearl, J.: Causal inference in the health sciences: a conceptual introduction. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Method. 2(3–4), 189–220 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pérez-Berenguer, D., García-Molina, J.: INDIeAuthor: a metamodel-based textual language for authoring educational courses. IEEE Access 7, 51396–51416 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santanchè, A., Medeiros, C.B., Pastorello Jr., G.Z.: User-author centered multimedia building blocks. Multimedia Syst. 12(4), 403–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Studios, I.: Ink - inkle’s scripting language for writing interactive narrative (2019). https://github.com/inkle/ink
  15. 15.
    Tufte, E.R.: Beautiful Evidence, vol. 1. Graphics Press, Cheshire (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcos Felipe de Menezes Mota
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fagner Leal Pantoja
    • 1
  • Matheus Silva Mota
    • 1
  • Tiago de Araujo Guerra Grangeia
    • 2
  • Marco Antonio de Carvalho Filho
    • 2
  • André Santanchè
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ComputingUniversity of CampinasSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Faculty of Medical SciencesUniversity of CampinasSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations