Advertisement

Measuring Preferences in Game Mechanics: Towards Personalized Chocolate-Covered Broccoli

  • Irene Camps-OrtuetaEmail author
  • Pedro A. González-Calero
  • María Angeles Quiroga
  • Pedro P. Gómez-Martín
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11863)

Abstract

When developing educational games we face the problem of finding the right design for making the learning activities as intrinsic to the game mechanics as possible. Nevertheless, in many cases it is not possible to fully integrate the learning content into the game play, resulting in the well known “chocolate-covered broccoli” game design.

The long term goal of the work presented here is to determine whether a personalized selection of game mechanics for the playful part, the game mechanics around the learning part of the game, can improve the satisfaction of the player and therefore make the whole learning experience more enjoyable. The first step towards that goal is to obtain a model for the preferences of game mechanics for a particular type of game, and later use that model to guide the selection of game mechanics.

In this paper, we present Enigma MNCN a treasure hunt for mobile devices designed for the National Museum of Natural Sciences of Spain and some experimental results intended to identify preferences for game mechanics in that type of game across demographic variables. The main finding of these experiments is that preferences in game mechanics get shadowed when combined with a mostly disliked learning mechanic.

Keywords

Serious games Informal learning Games in museums Games for education Augmented Reality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the personnel at the National Museum of Natural Sciences in Madrid for their support and assistance in designing and evaluating Enigma Ciencia, in particular to Luis Barrera and Pilar López. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

This work is partly supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (TIN2017-87330-R and DI-16-08520).

References

  1. 1.
    Bruckman, A.: Can educational be fun? In: presented at the Game Developers Conference 1999, San Jose, CA (1999). http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/papers/bruckman-gdc99.pdf
  2. 2.
    Camps-Ortueta, I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, J.M., Gómez-Martín, P.P., González-Calero, P.A.: Combining augmented reality with real maps to promote social interaction in treasure hunts. In: CoSECivi. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1957, pp. 131–143. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Revised Edition. Harper Business (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goff, E.E., Mulvey, K.L., Irvin, M.J., Hartstone-Rose, A.: Applications of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: a review. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 27(5), 433–447 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9734-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habgood, J., Ainsworth, S.: Motivating children to learn effectively: exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. J. Learn. Sci. 20, 169–206 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koutsabasis, P.: Empirical evaluations of interactive systems in cultural heritage: a review. Int. J. Comput. Methods Herit. Sci. 1(1), 100–122 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J.: Improving the efficacy of games for change using personalization models. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24(5), 32:1–32:22 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3119929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orji, R., Tondello, G.F., Nacke, L.E.: Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. In: Mandryk, R.L., Hancock, M., Perry, M., Cox, A.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April 2018, p. 435. ACM (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009
  9. 9.
    Paliokas, I., Sylaiou, S.: The use of serious games in museum visits and exhibitions: a systematic mapping study. In: 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, VS-Games (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roussou, M., Pujol, L., Akrivi, K., Angelik, C., Sara, P., Vayanou, M.: The museum as digital storyteller: collaborative participatory creation of interactive digital experiences. In: MW2015: Museums and the Web (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sonja, S., Rigotti, T.: Instrumentality and expressiveness at work. Organisationspsychologie 3, 111–124 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tondello, G.F., Orji, R., Nacke, L.E.: Recommender systems for personalized gamification. In: Bieliková, M., Herder, E., Cena, F., Desmarais, M.C. (eds.) Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2017, Bratislava, Slovakia, 09–12 July 2017, pp. 425–430. ACM (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099114
  13. 13.
    Tondello, G.F., Wehbe, R.R., Orji, R., Ribeiro, G., Nacke, L.E.: A framework and taxonomy of videogame playing preferences. In: Schouten, B.A.M., Markopoulos, P., Toups, Z.O., Cairns, P.A., Bekker, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY 2017, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 15–18 October 2017, pp. 329–340. ACM (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116629

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations