Strategies for Inclusive End-User Co-Creation of Inclusive Storytelling Games

  • Franco Eusébio GarciaEmail author
  • Vânia Paula de Almeida Neris
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11863)


As gaming acquires new purposes (for instance, entertainment, education and healthcare), game accessibility becomes increasingly important for multiple domains. For broader inclusion, game accessibility encompass both creation and play. Towards this goal, we have defined a framework to enable more people to create and play digital games In this paper, we present strategies resulting from developing and evaluating Lepi, an inclusive end-user tool for co-creation of inclusive storytelling-based games. Adults with heterogeneous interaction needs, levels of literacy and experience with computers used Lepi to co-create their games over ten creation workshops. Using Lepi and following the framework practices, the participants managed to co-create games accessible for themselves and their peers. From this experience, we have identified some strategies (Creation Commands, Interaction Alternatives for Input, Slots, Creation Alternatives, Assisted and Collaborative Co-Creation, Gentle Slopes, Multimodal Features, Playing Commands and Presenting Game Content) which can contribute towards more inclusive practices of game creation and play of storytelling-based games.


End-User Development Game development Game accessibility Universal Design Meta-Design Human-Centered Computing 


  1. 1.
    Aguado-Delgado, J., Gutiérrez-Martínez, J.M., Hilera, J.R., de-Marcos, L., Otón, S.: Accessibility in video games: a systematic review. Univ. Access Inf. Soc., 1-25 (2018).
  2. 2.
    Basawapatna, A.R., Repenning, A., Koh, K.H., Savignano, M.: The consume - create spectrum: balancing convenience and computational thinking in stem learning. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014, pp. 659–664. ACM, New York (2014).
  3. 3.
    Bennett, C.L., Brady, E., Branham, S.M.: Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2018, pp. 161–173. ACM, New York (2018).
  4. 4.
    Bouissac, P. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Semiotics. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, Q., Kafai, Y.B.: Decade of game making for learning: from tools to communities. In: Angelides, R.C., Agius, H. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Games, pp. 689–709. Wiley, Cambridge (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbonaro, M., et al.: Interactive story authoring: a viable form of creative expression for the classroom. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 687–707 (2008). Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Leeuw, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Sierra, J.L., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Fernández-Manjón, B.: A documental approach to adventure game development. Sci. Comput. Program. 67(1), 3–31 (2007). Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Souza, P.M., da Hora Rodrigues, K.R., Garcia, F.E., de Almeida Neris, V.P.: Towards a semiotic-based approach to the design of therapeutic digital games. In: Liu, K., Nakata, K., Li, W., Baranauskas, C. (eds.) ICISO 2018. IAICT, vol. 527, pp. 53–62. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia, F.E.: Um Motor para Jogos Digitais Universais. Msc thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia, F.E.: An Inclusive End-User Development Framework for Tailorable Games. Phd thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia, F.E., Brandão, R.P., Mendes, G.C.D.P., Neris, V.P.D.A.: Able to create, able to (self-)improve: how an inclusive game framework fostered self-improvement through creation and play in alcohol and drugs rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2019). Paphos, Cyprus (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia, F.E., de Almeida Neris, V.P.: A data-driven entity-component approach to develop universally accessible games. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 537–548. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gee, E.R., Tran, K.M.: Video game making and modding. In: Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media, pp. 238–267. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giannakopoulos, G., Tatlas, N.A., Giannakopoulos, V., Floros, A., Katsoulis, P.: Accessible electronic games for blind children and young people. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 49(4), 608–619 (2018). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grammenos, D., Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Designing universally accessible games. Mag. Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 7, 29 (2009). SPECIAL ISSUE: Media Arts and GamesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grammenos, D., Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Unified design of universally accessible games. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4556, pp. 607–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gregory, J.: Game Engine Architecture, 2nd edn. A K Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Klann, M., Wulf, V.: End-user development: an emerging paradigm. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 9, pp. 1–8. Springer, Netherlands (2006). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, P., Ding, X., Gu, N.: Helping others makes me happy: social interaction and integration of people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2016, pp. 1596–1608. ACM, New York (2016).
  20. 20.
    Marchiori, E.J., Torrente, J., del Blanco, Á., Moreno-Ger, P., Sancho, P., Fernández-Manjón, B.: A narrative metaphor to facilitate educational game authoring. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 590–599 (2012). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mørch, A.: Three levels of end-user tailoring: Customization, integration, and extension. In: Computers and Design in Context, pp. 51–76 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muller, M.J., Haslwanter, J.H., Dayton, T.: Participatory practices in the software lifecycle. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn, pp. 255–297. Elsevier Science Inc., Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Porter, J.R.: Understanding and addressing real-world accessibility issues in mainstream video games. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 108, 42–45 (2014). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pozzi, S., Bagnara, S.: Individuation and diversity: The need for idiographic HCI. Theo. Issues Ergonomics Sci. 14(1), 1–21 (2013). Scholar
  25. 25.
    Repenning, A., Ioannidou, A.: What makes end-user development tick? 13 design guidelines. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 9, pp. 51–85. Springer, Netherlands (2006). Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodrigues, K., Garcia, F.E., Bocanegra, L., Gonçalves, V., Carvalho, V., Neris, V.P.A.: Personas-driven design for mental health therapeutic applications. SBC J. Interact. Syst. 6(1), 18–34 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Urbanek, M., Güldenpfennig, F., Schrempf, M.T.: Building a community of audio game designers - towards an online audio game editor. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2018 Companion, pp. 171–175. ACM, New York (2018).
  28. 28.
    Westin, T., Dupire, J.: Design of a curriculum framework for raising awareness of game accessibility. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds.) ICCHP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9758, pp. 501–508. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan, B., Folmer, E., Harris, F.: Game accessibility: a survey. Universal Access Inf. Soc. 10(1), 81–100 (2011). Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de ComputaçãoUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)São CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations