Advertisement

Breast Reconstruction with the Robotic-Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Harvest

  • Mark W. ClemensEmail author
  • Jesse C. Selber
Chapter
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Surgeons have spent the better part of four decades attempting to do more with less, evolving from large open surgical procedures to laparoscopic approaches and now finally to robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Robotic-assisted technology has allowed for significant advances in tumor ablation while minimizing surgical morbidity, essentially freeing physicians from the physical limitations of their own hands. Robotic techniques have been successfully integrated into urology, surgical oncology, gynecology, and thoracic surgery, but plastic surgical indications remain a relatively novel frontier.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction Latissimus dorsi flap Robotic-assisted harvest Minimally invasive surgery Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System Robotic plastic surgery 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any relevant financial relationships or affiliations to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ascherman JA, Hanasono MW, Newman MI, Hughes DB. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:930–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, et al. Comparison of immediate and delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spear SL, Boehmler CMW. The latissimus flap in the irradiated breast. In: Spear SL, editor. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. p. 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kronowitz SJ. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;96:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kronowitz SJ. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction: technical and timing considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selber JC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:88e–90e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus Dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):1305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin CH, Wei FC, Levin LS, Chen MC. Donor-site morbidity comparison between endoscopically assisted and traditional harvest of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1070–7; quiz 1078; review erratum Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105:823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pomel C, Missana MC, Lasser P. Endoscopic harvesting of the latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstructive surgery: feasibility study and review of the literature. Ann Chir. 2002;127:337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Motwami SB, Strom EA, Schechter NR, et al. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the technical delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus Dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2014;28(1):20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations