Advertisement

Congestion Control for Improved Cluster-Head Gateway Switch Routing Protocol Using Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Algorithm

  • U. B. MahadevaswamyEmail author
  • M. P. Jananitha
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 39)

Abstract

MANETs are emerging as the torrid research topic in the wireless communication domain. These MANETs are used in emergency cases like military, flood, earthquake, etc. to set-up a fast, easy and feasible network. Proactive is a table-driven protocol, consists of routing table information before setting up a connection. Reactive protocols setup path only when it is demanded by the network. In this paper, we have proposed a protocol that combines the advantages of both cluster-head gateway switch routing protocol (CGSR) and adhoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) to minimize the traffic congestion in ad-hoc wireless network. The results of performance metrics like routing overhead, end-end delay, and packet delivery ratio are enhanced and compared with other clustering protocols like CGSR, LEACH, and DUCS.

Keywords

MANET AODV CGSR Cluster-head Congestion control 

References

  1. 1.
    Singh, A.P., Bhukya, S.N.: HP-AODV: an enhanced AODV routing protocol for high mobility MANETs. In: Advanced Computing and Communication Techniques for High Performance Applications, pp. 0975–8887 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anju, S.S.: Modified AODV for congestion control in MANET. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 4(6), 984–1001 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abu-Ein, A., Nader, J.: An enhanced AODV routing protocol for MANETs. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 11(1), 54 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heena, Goyal, D.: Congestion control using enhanced AODV routing mechanism in MANET. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 3(8), 555–565 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sathiamoorthy, J., Ramakrishnan, B.: Energy and delay efficient dynamic cluster formation using hybrid AGA with FACO in EAACK MANETs. Wirel. Netw. 23, 371–385 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devarajan, K., Padmathilagam, V.: An enhanced cluster-head gateway switch routing protocol (ECGSR) for congestion control using AODV algorithm in MANET. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 123(3), 37–42 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aissaa, M., Belghith, A.: Quality of Clustering in mobile Ad Hoc networks. In: 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Network and Technologies, pp. 245–252 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mungare, S.A., Patil, R.S.: Review of enhanced AODV routing protocol for mobile adhoc wireless networks. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electron. Commun. Eng. 1(5), 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phate, N., Saxena, M., Rizvi, M.A.: Minimizing congestion and improved QoS of AODV using clustering in MANET. In: IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma, S., Jindal, D., Agarwal, R.: An approach for congestion control in mobile ad hoc networks. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Dev. 7(3), 2249–6149 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pathak, S., Dutta, N., Jain, S.: An improved cluster maintenance scheme for MANET. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lalitha, V., Rajesh, R.S.: Power aware and topology aware ad-hoc on demand multipath distance vector routing for MANET. In: IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rishiwal, V., Yadav, M., Singh, O., Yadav, M.: Analysis of ADHOC routing protocols: a retroscopic view. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEJSSS&TUMysuruIndia

Personalised recommendations