Advertisement

DEKGB: An Extensible Framework for Health Knowledge Graph

  • Ming Sheng
  • Yuyao Shao
  • Yong ZhangEmail author
  • Chao Li
  • Chunxiao Xing
  • Han Zhang
  • Jingwen Wang
  • Fei Gao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11924)

Abstract

With the progress of medical informatization and the substantial growth of clinical data, knowledge graph is playing an increasingly important role in medical domain. Medical domain is highly specialized with abundant high-quality ontologies, and has many professional sub-fields such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and so on. It is very difficult to build a health knowledge graph for all of the diseases because of data availability and deep involvement of doctors. In this paper, we propose an efficient and extensible framework, DEKGB, to construct knowledge graphs for specific diseases based on prior medical knowledge and EMRs with doctor-involved. After that, we present the detailed process how DEKGB is applied to extend an existing health knowledge graph to include a new disease. It is confirmed that using this framework, doctors can get highly specialized health knowledge graphs conveniently and efficiently.

Keywords

Health knowledge graph Extensibility Conceptual graph Instance graph 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSFC (91646202), National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1404400, 2018YFB1402700).

References

  1. 1.
    Ehrlinger, L., Wöß, W.: Towards a definition of knowledge graphs. In: SEMANTiCS (Posters, Demos, SuCCESS) (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nickel, M., Murphy, K., Tresp, V., Gabrilovich, E.: A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs: from multi-relational link prediction to automated knowledge graph construction. CoRR abs/1503.00759 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang, Z., Yang, J., van Harmelen, F., Hu, Q.: Constructing disease-centric knowledge graphs: a case study for depression (short version). In: ten Teije, A., Popow, C., Holmes, John H., Sacchi, L. (eds.) AIME 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10259, pp. 48–52. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gatta, R., et al.: Generating and comparing knowledge graphs of medical processes using pMineR. In: Corcho, Ó., et al. (eds.) K-CAP, pp. 36:1–36:4. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savova, G.K., et al.: Mayo clinical text analysis and knowledge extraction system (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(5), 507–513 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ali, T., et al.: Multi-model-based interactive authoring environment for creating shareable medical knowledge. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 150, 41–72 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unbehauen, J., Martin, M.: SPARQL update queries over R2RML mapped data sources. In: Eibl, M., Gaedke, M. (eds.) GI-Jahrestagung, pp. 1891–1901. GI (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Z., Tong, Z., Yu, Z., Yali, P.: Attention-based deep residual learning network for entity relation extraction in Chinese EMRs. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 19–S(2), 171–177 (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, Z., Wei, X., Kai, Y.: Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01991
  10. 10.
    Yimam, S.M., Biemann, C., Majnaric, L., Šabanović, Š., Holzinger, A.: Interactive and iterative annotation for biomedical entity recognition. In: Guo, Y., Friston, K., Aldo, F., Hill, S., Peng, H. (eds.) BIH 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9250, pp. 347–357. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fan, J., Li, G.: Human-in-the-loop rule learning for data integration. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 41(2), 104–115 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lample, G. Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., Dyer, C.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition. CoRR abs/1603.01360 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C., Liu, H., Wang, G., Ding, L., Yu, L.: Entity relationship extraction based on potential relationship pattern. In: Wang, F.L., Gong, Z., Luo, X., Lei, J. (eds.) WISM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6318, pp. 370–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16515-3_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qu, M., Xiang, R., Yu, Z., Jiawei, H.: Weakly-supervised relation extraction by pattern-enhanced embedding learning. In: Champin, P.-A., et al. (eds.) WWW, pp. 1257–1266. ACM (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming Sheng
    • 1
  • Yuyao Shao
    • 2
  • Yong Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chao Li
    • 1
  • Chunxiao Xing
    • 1
  • Han Zhang
    • 3
  • Jingwen Wang
    • 2
  • Fei Gao
    • 4
  1. 1.RIIT&BNRCIST&DCST, Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Foreign Studies UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina
  4. 4.Henan Justice Police Vocational CollegeZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations