Advertisement

Protocols for the Dynamic Lines of Collaboration

  • Hao ZhongEmail author
  • Shimon Y. Nof
Chapter
Part of the Automation, Collaboration, & E-Services book series (ACES, volume 6)

Abstract

In this chapter, DLOC is established with mathematical definitions to model network-to-network services. From the client perspective, DLOC provides conflict/error prevention, detection, and recovery services; and from the service team perspective, DLOC determines the dynamic configuration structure of collaborative agents. The three research questions (see Sect.  3.3) are answered by three control mechanisms: (1) Asynchronous collaboration requirement planning is designed for the formation of service team; (2) The nodes with high centrality in the client network are used as the depot for the agents in the service team; (3) Neuroplasticity-inspired protocols are applied to determine the schedule of providing services requested from the client network. Performance metrics are designed to evaluate the efficacy of different control protocols. The experimental platform for DLOC model and control protocols are described in Chap.  5. The experiments and results are detailed in Chap.  6.

References

  1. 1.
    Blanes C, Mellado M, Ortiz C, Valera A (2011) Technologies for robot grippers in pick and place operations for fresh fruits and vegetables. Span J Agric Res 9(4):1130–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol 2:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Networks 27(1):55–71MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butz M, van Ooyen A (2013) A simple rule for dendritic spine and axonal bouton formation can account for cortical reorganization after focal retinal lesions. PLoS Comput Biol 9(10):e1003259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzna L, Peters K, Ammoser H, Kuhnert C, Helbing D (2007) Efficient response in cascading disaster spreading. Phys Rev E 75:056107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chklovskii DB, Mel BW, Svoboda K (2004) Cortical rewiring and information storage. Nature 431(7010):782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman J (1983) Emotional problems of the gifted child. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 24(3):481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krishna CM (2014) Fault-tolerant scheduling in homogeneous real-time systems. ACM Comput Surveys 46(4):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee S (2012) The role of centrality in ambulance dispatching. Decis Support Syst 54(1):282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy TH, Corbett D (2009) Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(12):861–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman ME (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70(5):056131Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajan VN, Nof SY (1996) Cooperation requirement planning for multiprocessors: optimal assignment and execution planning. J Intell Rob Syst 15:419–435Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sabidussi G (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31(4):581–603MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang L, Yu C, Chen H et al (2010) Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 133(4):1224–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao L, Zeng B (2013) Vulnerability analysis of power grids with line switching. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(3):2727–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhong H, Nof SY (2014) DLOC complex network model for supply network disruption response. In: Proceedings of international conference on production research—regional conference Europe, Africa and Middle East, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facebook Inc.Menlo ParkUSA
  2. 2.PRISM CenterPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations