Advertisement

Designing a Serious Game to Motivate Energy Savings in a Museum: Opportunities & Challenges

  • Dimosthenis KotsopoulosEmail author
  • Cleopatra Bardaki
  • Thanasis G. Papaioannou
  • Stavros Lounis
  • George D. Stamoulis
  • Katerina Pramatari
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11899)

Abstract

The ongoing global environmental crisis has led to the identification of energy-saving as a worldwide necessity. Public buildings hold great unexploited opportunities towards that end. Moreover, the occupants’ behavior is an impactful factor that can potentially lead to significant energy-savings therein. Recognizing the engaging power of games towards that end, our research aim is to motivate human-driven energy conservation in an especially challenging organizational context: an art museum. Through a survey of our context, we recognized the energy-saving opportunities for employees and visitors therein. Consequently we designed and present an effective serious game that fits the special characteristics of a museum’s exhibition area, as well as the users’ requirements, thus providing a mutually engaging experience for personnel and visitors alike. We also present and discuss the results from the participation of museum visitors in the game, as well as the actual energy savings achieved. Furthermore, we discuss our collected insights while designing and applying the serious game, so that future game designers can get a head start in their own projects, by keeping the challenges that may lay ahead in mind.

Keywords

Serious game Engagement Energy conservation Museum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research study is partially funded by the project ChArGED (CleAnweb Gamified Energy Disaggregation), that receives funding from the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, under grant agreement No 696170.

The research of Dr. Kotsopoulos and Dr. Papaioannou is partially financed by the Research Centre of Athens University of Economics and Business, in the context of the project entitled “Original Scientific Publications”.

The graphic design of the user interfaces of the game app discussed in this paper, and its software implementation, have been performed by Evi Ioannidou and Kostas Vasilakis & Themis Apostologlou respectively, for European Dynamics S.A. (http://www.eurodyn.com) – the coordinator of project ChArGED.

References

  1. Aiolli, F., Ciman, M., Donini, M., Ombretta, G.: Serious game to persuade people to use stairs. In: Persuasive 2014 Posters, pp. 11–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. Conti, J., Holtberg, P., Diefenderfer, J., LaRose, A., Turnure, J.T., Westfall, L.: International Energy Outlook 2016, With Projections to 2040 (May 2016). U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, D.C. (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Cool Choices. Employee Engagement Sustainability Game (2019). https://coolchoices.com/. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
  4. Darby, S.: The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: a review for Defra of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Environ. Chang. Inst. Univ. Oxf. 22(April), 1–21 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojee.2013.21002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delmas, M.A., Fischlein, M., Asensio, O.I.: Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy 61, 729–739 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Energic. Energic - Smart Energy Challenge (2019). http://www.energic.io/. Accessed 6 Apr 2019
  7. Fijnheer, J.D., Van Oostendorp, H., Veltkamp, R.C.: Gamification in a prototype household energy game. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 192–201 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. Fijnheer, J.D., Van Oostendorp, H.: Steps to design a household energy game. Int. J. Serious Games 3(3), 12–22 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v3i3.131
  9. Gamberini, L., et al.: Tailoring feedback to users’ actions in a persuasive game for household electricity conservation. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geelen, D., Keyson, D., Stella, B., Brezet, H.: Exploring the use of a game to stimulate energy saving in households. J. Des. Res. 10, 102–120 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2012.046096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossberg, F., Wolfson, M., Mazur-Stommen, S., Farley, K., Nadel, S.: Gamified Energy Efficiency Programs. Washington, D.C. (2015). http://www.climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/aceee.pdf
  12. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook, Paris, France (2016)Google Scholar
  13. Kotsopoulos, D., Bardaki, C., Lounis, S., Papaioannou, T., Pramatari, K.: Designing an IoT-enabled gamification application for energy conservation at the workplace: exploring personal and contextual characteristics. In: 30th Bled e-Conference: Digital Transformation – From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives, pp. 369–383. University of Maribor Press (2017).  https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-043-1.26
  14. Kotsopoulos, D., Bardaki, C., Papaioannou, T.G., Lounis, S., Pramatari, K.: Agile user-centered design of an IoT-enabled gamified intervention for energy conservation. IADIS Int. J. WWW/Internet 16(1), 1–25 (2018). http://www.iadisportal.org/ijwi/papers/2018161101.pdf
  15. Kotsopoulos, D., Bardaki, C., Papaioannou, T.G., Lounis, S., Pramatari, K.: Gamification at work: employee motivations to participate and preferences for energy conservation. In: Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS) 2018 Proceedings, pp. 1–17 (2018b). https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2018/19
  16. Lo, S.H., Peters, G.J.Y., Kok, G.: Energy-related behaviors in office buildings: a qualitative study on individual and organisational determinants. Appl. Psychol. 61(2), 227–249 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00464.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lounis, S., Kotsopoulos, D., Bardaki, C., Papaioannou, T.G., Pramatari, K.: Waste no more: gamification for energy efficient behaviour at the workplace. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1857 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. Lutzenhiser, L.: Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 18, 247–289 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsumura, N., Fruchter, R., Leifer, L.: Shikakeology: designing triggers for behavior change. AI Soc. 30(4), 419–429 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0556-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthies, E., Kastner, I., Klesse, A., Wagner, H.-J.: High reduction potentials for energy user behavior in public buildings: how much can psychology-based interventions achieve? J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 1(3), 241–255 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0024-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen, T.A., Aiello, M.: Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: a survey. Energy Build. 56, 244–257 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nikkila, S., Linn, S., Sundaram, H., Kelliher, A.: Playing in Taskville: designing a social game for the workplace. In: CHI 2011 Workshop on Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Game Contexts, pp. 1–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Papaioannou, T., et al.: An IoT-based gamified approach for reducing occupants’ energy wastage in public buildings. Sensors 18(2), 537 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020537MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Papaioannou, T.G., et al.: IoT-enabled gamification for energy conservation in public buildings. In: GIoTS 2017 - Global Internet of Things Summit, Proceedings (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/GIOTS.2017.8016269
  25. Pettersen, I.N., Verhulst, E., Valle Kinloch, R., Junghans, A., Berker, T.: Ambitions at work: professional practices and the energy performance of non-residential buildings in Norway. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 32, 112–120 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reeves, B., Cummings, J.J., Scarborough, J.K., Flora, J., Anderson, D.: Leveraging the engagement of games to change energy behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, CTS 2012, pp. 354–358 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2012.6261074
  27. Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Gnoth, D., Lawson, R., Thorsnes, P.: Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy 38(10), 6120–6129 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNFCCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification (2016). http://unfccc.int/2860.php. Accessed 30 Nov 2016
  29. WeSpire. WeSpire - Employee Engagement Platform Powered by Behavioral Science (2019). https://www.wespire.com/. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ELTRUN e-Business Research Center, Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and TelematicsHarokopio UniversityTavros-AthensGreece
  3. 3.Network Economics and Services (NES) GroupAthens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations