Designing a 2D Platform Game with Mathematics Curriculum

  • Varvara GarneliEmail author
  • Christos Sotides
  • Konstantinos Patiniotis
  • Ioannis Deliyannis
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11899)


New technologies and media aim at triggering student interest in mathematics and at making learning an entertaining process. However, playful math games need to provide learners with a better experience, which is connected with an engaging gameplay. Popular game mechanics could be used in order to integrate learning in the playing activities. This research employs the Super Mario game format for the design of a playful educational serious game in the context of math education. Mario Maths is addressed to students of 12 and 13 years old and aims to the practice of divisibility criteria. Mario collects numbers instead of coins that must be exactly divided with the number - target, avoiding or eliminating the wrong answers. A wrong choice transports Mario to a subterranean world which informs him for his mistake, but with no influence on the final goal achievement according to a constructive error and trial method. In the end of each track, the player is taking feedback of his effort in a self-assessment process. Mario Maths was developed to be used as a complementary educational tool for students who might be attracted from such forms of media. (


Educational serious games Math games Game design 


  1. 1.
    Becker, K.: Battle of the titans: Mario vs. MathBlaster. In: EdMedia + Innovate Learning, pp. 2707–2716. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), June 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beremlijski, P., Vondráková, P., Litschmannová, M., Mařík, R.: Math games for one player. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conferences, pp. 2395–2402 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chorianopoulos, K., Giannakos, M.N.: Design principles for serious video games in mathematics education: from theory to practice. Int. J. Serious Games 1(3), 51–59 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 661–686 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., Herbsleb, J.: Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1277–1286. ACM, February 2012Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz-Uhler, B., Hurn, J.E.: Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: a faculty perspective. J. Interact. Online Learn. 12(1), 17–26 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eliëns, A., Ruttkay, Z.: Math games: an alternative (approach) to teaching math. In: GAMEON, pp. 68–74, November 2009Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabricatore, C.: Gameplay and game mechanics. a key to quality in videogames. In: ENLACES (MINEDUC Chile) – OECD Expert Meeting on Videogames and Education, 29–31 October 2007, Santiago de Chile, Chile (2007). Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  9. 9.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 1(1), 20 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Jaccheri, L., Chrisochoides, N.: “This game is girly!” perceived enjoyment and student acceptance of edutainment. In: Göbel, S., Müller, W., Urban, B., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) E-Learning and Games for Training, Education, Health and Sports, pp. 89–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guardiola, E.: The gameplay loop: a player activity model for game design and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, p. 23. ACM, November 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hung, D.: Theories of learning and computer-mediated instructional technologies. Educ. Media Int. 38(4), 281–287 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ke, F.: A case study of computer gaming for math: engaged learning from gameplay? Comput. Educ. 51(4), 1609–1620 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan, J., et al.: Angle Jungle: an educational game about angles. In: Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 633–638. ACM, October 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lim, C.S., Tang, K.N., Kor, L.K.: Drill and practice in learning (and beyond). In: Seel, N.M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston (2012). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loguidice, B., Barton, M.: Vintage Games: An Insider Look at the History of Grand Theft Auto, Super Mario, and the Most Influential Games of all Time. Focal Press (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ortega, J., Shaker, N., Togelius, J., Yannakakis, G.N.: Imitating human playing styles in super mario bros. Entertain. Comput. 4(2), 93–104 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riconscente, M.M.: Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game Motion Math. Games Cult. 8(4), 186–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schumacher, C., Ifenthaler, D.: Features students really expect from learning analytics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 397–407 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, H., Sun, C.T.: Game reward systems: gaming experiences and social meanings. In: DiGRA Conference, pp. 1–15, September 2011Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vorobyov, N.N.: Criteria for Divisibility. University of Chicago Press (1980)Google Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Varvara Garneli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christos Sotides
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Patiniotis
    • 1
  • Ioannis Deliyannis
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Ionian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations