Advertisement

A Serious Game Design and Evaluation Approach to Enhance Cultural Heritage Understanding

  • Christina TsitaEmail author
  • Maya Satratzemi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11899)

Abstract

One of the most promising means regarding the potential of supporting both, entertainment and learning, in cultural heritage sector are the Serious Games (SGs). During last decades, Cultural Heritage Serious Games (CHSGs) are being developed with the use of different technologies, in order to facilitate learning of cultural heritage via an entertaining manner. Although, there are evidences about CHSGs effects, there is the need of extracting more reliable results about their effectiveness, meaning the extent to which the initial intentions achieved their purpose. Regarding CHSGs, this purpose is twofold, which means the measurements are as much about entertainment as learning. Moreover, there is the need of increasing evidences on CHSGs’ effectiveness regarding higher-cognitive processes in learning. The aim of the present paper is to describe a CHSG design and evaluation approach, which is oriented to the enhancement CHSGs effectiveness in terms of entertaining and learning, as well as the extraction of more reliable results. Regarding learning aspects, the proposed approach focuses on extracting results about cultural heritage understanding. The suggested approach will be applied in a CHSG for the understanding of the Roman Forum of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Keywords

Serious Games Cultural Heritage Game design 

References

  1. 1.
    Tsita, C., Satratzemi, M.: How serious games in cultural heritage are being evaluated. In: Proceedings of the 11th Pan-Hellenic & International Conference, ICT in Education (HCICTE), Thessaloniki (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malegiannaki, I., Daradoumis, Τ.: Analyzing the educational design, use and effect of spatial games for cultural heritage: a literature review. Comput. Educ. 108, 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paliokas, I., Sylaiou, S.: The use of serious games in museum visits and exhibitions: a systematic mapping study. In: 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mortara, M., Catalano, C.E., Bellotti, F., Fiucci, G., Houry-Panchetti, M., Petridis, P.: Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Heritage 15(3), 318–325 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, F.E., McLoughlin, L., Liarokapis, F., Peters, C., Petridis, P., de Freitas, S.: Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14(4), 255–275 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., D’ursi, A., Fiore, V.: A serious game model for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Heritage (JOCCH) 5(4), 1–27 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2399180.2399185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(4), 212–218 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catalano, C.E., Luccini, A.M., Mortara, M.: Guidelines for an effective design of serious games. Int. J. Serious Games 1(1) (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsita, C., Satratzemi, M.: Conceptual factors for the design of serious games. In: Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Söbke, H. (eds.) GALA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11385, pp. 232–241. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yannakakis, G.N., Togelius, J.: Artificial Intelligence and Games. Springer, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, London (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games: an overview (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petri, G., von Wangenheim, C.G., Borgatto, A.F.: MEEGA+: an evolution of a model for the evaluation of educational games. INCoD/GQS, 3 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between learning and development. Read. Dev. Child. 23(3), 34–41 (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied InformaticsUniversity of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations