Advertisement

Some Notes on the Possibile Role of Cognitive Architectures in Serious Games

  • Manuel GentileEmail author
  • Giuseppe Città
  • Antonio Lieto
  • Mario Allegra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11899)

Abstract

This paper provides a preliminary analysis of the possible role of cognitive architectures in the field of Serious Games. The seminal works that explore the use of Cognitive Architecture in games will be analyzed in the light of an emerging perspective of the games AI research area. Finally, an initial proposal of application of Cognitive Architecture for the design and implementation of non-player characters will be presented.

Keywords

Serious games Cognitive Architecture Cognitive Science Artificial Intelligence 

References

  1. 1.
    In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017, New York, NY, USA, 22–25 August 2017. IEEE (2017). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8067294
  2. 2.
    In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2018, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 14–17 August 2018. IEEE (2018). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8473398
  3. 3.
    Alonso-Fernández, C., Cano, A.R., Calvo-Morata, A., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Fernández-Manjón, B.: Lessons learned applying learning analytics to assess serious games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 99, 301–309 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.036. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219302171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., Qin, Y.: An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol. Rev. 111(4), 1036 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J. Learn. Sci. 4(2), 167–207 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson, J.R., Gluck, K.: What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems. Cognition & Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress, 227–262 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Augello, A., Gentile, M., Dignum, F.: Social agents for learning in virtual environments. In: Bottino, R., Jeuring, J., Veltkamp, R.C. (eds.) GALA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10056, pp. 133–143. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cerny, V., Dechterenko, F.: Rogue-like games as a playground for artificial intelligence – evolutionary approach. In: Chorianopoulos, K., Divitini, M., Hauge, J.B., Jaccheri, L., Malaka, R. (eds.) ICEC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9353, pp. 261–271. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, M.T., Chen, J.H., Chu, S.J., Chen, S.Y.: The use of serious games in science education: a review of selected empirical research from 2002 to 2013. J. Comput. Educ. 2(3), 353–375 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0039-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conde Ramírez, J.C., Sánchez López, A., Sánchez Flores, A.: An architecture for cognitive modeling to support real-time adaptation and motivational responses in video games. In: Castro, F., Gelbukh, A., González, M. (eds.) MICAI 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8265, pp. 144–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45114-0_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Toward a psychology of optimal experience. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 209–226. Springer, Dordrecht (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    In: Dignum, F. (ed.) Agents for Games and Simulations II - Trends in Techniques, Concepts and Design [AGS 2010, The Second International Workshop on Agents for Games and Simulations, Toronto, Canada, 10 May 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6525. Springer (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18181-8
  13. 13.
    Dignum, F., Bradshaw, J., Silverman, B., van Doesburg, W. (eds.): AGS 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5920. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.): Serious Games Foundations, Concepts and Practice. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evans, J.S.B., Stanovich, K.E.: Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8(3), 223–241 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frutos-Pascual, M., Zapirain, B.G.: Review of the use of AI techniques in serious games: decision making and machine learning. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 9(2), 133–152 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2015.2512592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gazzard, A.: The platform and the player: exploring the (hi) stories of elite. Game Stud. 13(2) (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gemrot, J., et al.: Pogamut 3 can assist developers in building AI (not only) for their videogame agents. In: Dignum, F., Bradshaw, J., Silverman, B., van Doesburg, W. (eds.) AGS 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5920, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Söbke, H. (eds.): GALA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11385. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gentile, M., et al.: The effect of disposition to critical thinking on playing serious games. In: Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Söbke, H. (eds.) GALA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11385, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghosh, S., Verbrugge, R.: Studying strategies and types of players: experiments, logics and cognitive models. Synthese 195(10), 4265–4307 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1338-7MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., Group, A.: Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Evolution and Cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000). https://books.google.it/books?id=4ObhBwAAQBAJGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greitzer, F.L., Kuchar, O.A., Huston, K.: Cognitive science implications for enhancing training effectiveness in a serious gaming context. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 7(3), 2 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1281320.1281322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books Limited, Westminster (2011). https://books.google.it/books?id=oV1tXT3HigoCGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kotseruba, I., Tsotsos, J.K.: 40 years of cognitive architectures: core cognitive abilities and practical applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9646-y
  26. 26.
    Laird, J.E.: Using a computer game to develop advanced AI. Computer 34(7), 70–75 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1109/2.933506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laird, J.: The Soar Cognitive Architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laird, J.E.: Extending the soar cognitive architecture. In: Artificial General Intelligence 2008, Proceedings of the First AGI Conference, AGI 2008, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA, 1–3 March 2008, pp. 224–235 (2008) http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=8310
  29. 29.
    Laird, J.E., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S.: SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artif. Intell. 33(1), 1–64 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Lent, M., et al.: Intelligent agents in computer games. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Eleventh Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, Florida, USA, 18–22 July 1999, pp. 929–930 (1999). http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1999/aaai99-143.php
  31. 31.
    Lieto, A., Lebiere, C., Oltramari, A.: The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: current limitations and possible developments. Cogn. Syst. Res. 48, 39–55 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lieto, A., Bhatt, M., Oltramari, A., Vernon, D.: The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence. Cogn. Syst. Res. 48, 1–3 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.08.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138904171730222X. cognitive Architectures for Artificial MindsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu, M., Kang, J., Liu, S., Zou, W., Hodson, J.: Learning analytics as an assessment tool in serious games: a review of literature. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, vol. 2, pp. 537–563. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51645-5_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lopes, R., Bidarra, R.: Adaptivity challenges in games and simulations: a survey. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 3(2), 85–99 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2011.2152841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lucas, S.M., Mateas, M., Preuss, M., Spronck, P., Togelius, J.: Artificial and computational intelligence in games (dagstuhl seminar 12191). In: Dagstuhl Reports, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 43–70 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.2.5.43
  36. 36.
    Magerko, B., Laird, J.E., Assanie, M., Kerfoot, A., Stokes, D.: AI characters and directors for interactive computer games. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sixteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, California, USA, 25–29 July 2004, pp. 877–883 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Magerko, B., Rowe, J.P. (eds.): Proceedings of the Thirteenth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE-17), Snowbird, Little Cottonwood Canyon, Utah, USA, 5–9 October 2017. AAAI Press (2017). http://www.aaai.org/Library/AIIDE/aiide17contents.php
  38. 38.
    Mehm, F., Radke, S., Göbel, S.: 80days: adaptive digital storytelling for digital educational games. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games, in conjunction with the 8th International Conference on Web-based Learning, STEG@ICWL 2009, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 21 August 2009 (2009). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-498/steg09_submission_9.pdf
  39. 39.
    van Oijen, J.: Cognitive agents in virtual worlds : a middleware design approach. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, Netherlands (2014). http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300548
  40. 40.
    Oltramari, A., Lebiere, C.: Pursuing artificial general intelligence by leveraging the knowledge capabilities of ACT-R. In: Bach, J., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds.) AGI 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7716, pp. 199–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peirce, N., Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Adaptive educational games: providing non-invasive personalised learning experiences. In: The 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, DIGITEL 2008, Banff, Canada,, 17–19 November 2008, pp. 28–35 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/DIGITEL.2008.30
  42. 42.
    Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14(2), 249–255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rowe, J.P., Smith, G. (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourteenth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, AIIDE 2018, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 13–17 November 2018. AAAI Press (2018). http://www.aaai.org/Library/AIIDE/aiide18contents.php
  44. 44.
    Schaeffer, J., van den Herik, H.: Games, computers, and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 134(1), 1–7 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00165-5. http://www.sciencedirect.com/sciGhoshence/article/pii/S0004370201001655CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Streicher, A., Smeddinck, J.D.: Personalized and adaptive serious games. In: Entertainment Computing and Serious Games - International GI-Dagstuhl Seminar 15283, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, 5–10 July 2015, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 332–377 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46152-6_14
  46. 46.
    Vermillion, S.D., Malak, R.J., Smallman, R., Becker, B., Sferra, M., Fields, S.: An investigation on using serious gaming to study human decision-making in engineering contexts. Des. Sci. 3, e15 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vernon, D.: Artificial Cognitive Systems: A primer. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yannakakis, G.N., Togelius, J.: A panorama of artificial and computational intelligence in games. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 7(4), 317–335 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2014.2339221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yannakakis, G.N., Togelius, J.: Artificial Intelligence and Games, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Gentile
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Giuseppe Città
    • 1
  • Antonio Lieto
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mario Allegra
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Educational TechnologyNational Research Council of ItalyPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di TorinoTurinItaly
  3. 3.ICAR, National Research Council of ItalyPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations