Advertisement

Accounting for Our Settler Colonialism: Toward an Unsettled German Studies in the United States

  • Ashwin ManthripragadaEmail author
  • Emina Mušanović
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Accommodating both decolonization and diversity in reshaping German Studies brings together two potentially incommensurable discourses. A chasm opens up when decolonization is first, repeatedly taken up metaphorically as a “decolonization of the mind,” and second, made commensurate with diversity frameworks. Both impulses in the decolonization of German Studies appear to be at odds with Decolonial Studies. In this essay, we first map out the conflict between decolonization as “decolonization of the mind” and decolonization as theorized by Indigenous Decolonial scholars. We then engage with challenges Decolonial Studies pose to German Studies specifically. Finally, we examine practices in our field that contribute to the continued erasure of Indigenous life.

Keywords

German Studies Decolonial studies Decolonization Colonialism Settler-colonialism 

References

  1. Bontempelli, Pier Carlo. 2003. Knowledge Power and Discipline: German Studies and National Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Conrad, Sebastian. 2012. German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitzpatrick, Matthew P. 2018. Colonialism, Postcolonialism, and Decolonization. Central European History 51 (1): 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gausset, Quentin, Justin Kenrick, and Robert Gibb. 2011. Indigeneity and Autochthony: A Couple of False Twins? Social Anthropology 19 (2): 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herminghouse, Patricia. 2005. German Studies in the USA: A History of Crises. Otago German Studies 20: 5–17.Google Scholar
  7. Iyengar, Malathi Michelle. 2014. “Not Mere Abstractions: Language Policies and Language Ideologies in U.S. Settler Colonialism.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3 (2): 33–59.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, Michael T. 1989. Identity, Critique, Affirmation: A Response to Hinrich C. Seeba’s Paper. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 155–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuzniar, Alice. 1996. Cross-Gendered Cross-Cultural Studies and the German Program. In The Future of Germanistik in the USA: Changing Our Prospects, edited by John A. McCarthy and Katrin Schneider, 122–31. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lennox, Sara. 1989. Feminist Scholarship and Germanistik. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 158–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rowe, Aimee Carrillo, and Eve Tuck. 2017. “Settler Colonialism and Cultural Studies: Ongoing Settlement, Cultural Production, and Resistance.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 17 (1): 3–13.Google Scholar
  12. Roy, Arundhati. 2008. “The Monster in the Mirror.” The Guardian, December 12, sec. World News. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/dec/12/mumbai-arundhati-roy.
  13. Saiz, Albert, and Elena Zoido. 2002. The Returns to Speaking a Second Language. Working Paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), No. 2–16, Research Dept, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. Seeba, Hinrich C. 1989. Critique of Identity Formation: Toward an Intercultural Model of German Studies. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seyhan, Azade. 1989. Prospects for Feminist Literary Theory in German Studies: A Response to Sara Lennox’s Paper. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 171–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharma, Nandita. 2017. “Migrants and Indigenous Nationalism.” In The Routledge International Handbook of European Social Transformations, edited by Peeter Vihalemm, Anu Masso, and Signe Opermann, 225–36. Routledge. Google Scholar
  17. Sharma, Nandita, and Cynthia Wright. 2008. “Decolonizing Resistance, Challenging Colonial States.” Social Justice 35 no. 3 (113): 120–38. Accessed January 7, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/29768504.Google Scholar
  18. Sium, Aman, Chandni Desai, and Eric Ritskes. 2012. “Towards the ‘Tangible Unknown’: Decolonization and the Indigenous Future.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): I–XIII.Google Scholar
  19. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trommler, Frank. 2015. “German Studies: The Short Version.” In Taking Stock of German Studies in the United States, NED-New edition, 15–28. Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer. Google Scholar
  22. Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2012. “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
  23. Tuhiwai Smith, Linda, Eve Tuck, and K Wayne Yang, eds. 2019. Indigenous and Decolonizing Studies in Education: Mapping the Long View. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Usbeck, Franck. 2013. “Learning from ‘Tribal Ancestors:’ How the Nazis Used Indian Imagery to Promote a ‘Holistic’ Understanding of Nature Among Germans.” ELOHI: Peuples Indigènes et Environnement 4 (July): 45–60.Google Scholar
  25. Wierlacher, Alois, and Andrea Bogner. 2003. Handbuch interkulturelle Germanistik. J.B. Metzler: Sonderausgabe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native. Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA
  2. 2.BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations