• Thomas AfflerbachEmail author
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)


Working in virtual teams is quickly becoming the rule rather than the exception. One organizational context, where the number of virtual teams has increased significantly in recent years is the Shared Services Organization. Yet, despite their popularity, such virtual teams are fraught with problems of cooperation, as they are prone to suffer from social dilemma situations due to circumstantial, i.e. contextual, reasons. Moreover, the risk of a cooperation problem is not only particularly high, but also difficult to manage in virtual teams. However, our knowledge on how members of hybrid virtual teams in Shared Services Organizations can overcome the cooperation problem is very limited. Therefore the goal of the study presented in this book is to expand our understanding of how cooperation can be fostered in the challenging context of hybrid virtual teams in Shared Services Organizations. I conducted an in-depth qualitative study and identified thirteen different expressions of contextual challenges categorized in ‘faultlines through distance’, ‘disconnection through communication technology’ and ‘discontinuity through temporality of team composition’, which may lead to cooperation problems of hybrid virtual teams in Shared Services Organizations. In a similar context-sensitive manner, this study allows me to expound twenty-two different practices to foster cooperation in such a challenging team context. These practices can be categorized in ‘strategy of identity constructing’, ‘strategy of trusting’ and ‘strategy of virtual peer monitoring’ and can be used by the individual team members to foster cooperation. Further,  I show how technology can facilitate, but not ensure, the use of these strategies and practices to foster cooperation.


  1. Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote, L., & Kane, A. A. (2009). Superordinate identity and knowledge creation and transfer in organizations. Knowledge Governance, 166–190.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, R. M., DeFillippi, R. J., Schwab, A., & Sydow, J. (2016). Temporary organizing: Promises, processes, problems. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1703–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carte, T. A., Chidambaram, L., & Becker, A. (2006). Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(4), 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). ‘The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?’ The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiol, C. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Frost, J., Osterloh, M., & Weibel, A. (2010). Governing knowledge work: Transactional and transformational solutions. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henttonen, K., & Blomqvist, K. (2005). Managing distance in a global virtual team: the evolution of trust through technology-mediated relational communication. Strategic Change, 14(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hinds, P. J., Neeley, T. B., & Cramton, C. D. (2014). Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 536–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howcroft, D., & Richardson, H. (2012). The back office goes global: Exploring connections and contradictions in shared service centres. Work, Employment & Society, 26(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janssen, O., & Huang, X. (2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of management information systems, 14(4), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D. G., & Haney, M. H. (2010). Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21(2), 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knol, A., Janssen, M., & Sol, H. (2014). A taxonomy of management challenges for developing shared services arrangements. European Management Journal, 32(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (2004). Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Kumar, K., van Fenema, P. C., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2009). Offshoring and the global distribution of work- Implications for task interdependence theory and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(4), 642–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
  30. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, 114–139.Google Scholar
  31. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: People working across boundaries with technology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. (2006). Trust in the balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. Handbook of trust research, 87–106.Google Scholar
  33. Loughry, M. L. (2010). Peer control in organizations. In S. B. Sitkin, L. B. Cardinal, & K. B. Bijlsma-Frankema (Eds.), Organizational control (pp. 324–361). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 9–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, G. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas. The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Muethel, M., Siebdrat, F., & Hoegl, M. (2012). When do we really need interpersonal trust in globally dispersed new product development teams? R&D Management, 42(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nikolova, N., Möllering, G., & Reihlen, M. (2015). Trusting as a ‘leap of faith’: Trust-building practices in client–consultant relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nixon, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Lee, H. U., & Jeong, E. (2004). Market reactions to announcements of corporate downsizing actions and implementation strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1121–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS quarterly, 365–395.Google Scholar
  43. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwarz, G. (2014). Public shared service centers: A theoretical and empirical analysis of US public sector organizations (Vol. 16). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Soalheira, J., & Timbrell, G. (2014). What is shared services? In Shared services as a new organizational form (pp. 67–84). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  46. Suleiman, J., & Watson, R. T. (2008). Social loafing in technology-supported teams. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing—Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weibel, A. (2007). Formal control and trustworthiness: Shall the twain never meet? Group and Organization Management, 32(4), 500–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Managers in a virtual context: The experience of self-threat and its effects on virtual work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6, 31.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, J. M., Boyer O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zander, L., Mockaitis, A. I., & Butler, C. L. (2012). Leading global teams. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 592–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zigurs, I. (2003). Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cooperative StudiesBerlin School of Economics and Law, University of Applied SciencesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations