Digital Twin of Experimental Workplace for Quality Control with Cloud Platform Support
- 13 Downloads
This chapter deals with implementation of digital twin for experimental quality control system to remote monitoring, simulation, and optimization of real process. The main area of study is problem of connection and transformation of digital data from quality control process and product to digital twins and synchronization with Cloud Platform. Actual status of experimental quality control system is synchronized with digital twin for online interaction. Digitalized data must be stored in long-term horizon, which is performed by Cloud Platform, and it provides Big Data processing techniques. Digital twin of quality control system is transferred from 3D model to simulation software Tecnomatix. Interconnection between cloud control system and simulated Tecnomatix model (digital twin) is realized by OPC server. The technologies selected for data collection from experimental system are vision systems, RFID, and MEMS devices.
KeywordsAutomation Industry 4.0 Digitalization Cloud platforms
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract No. APVV-15-0602 and also by the Project of the Structural Funds of the EU, ITMS code: 26220220103.
- 1.Židek, K., et al. (2018). Data optimization for communication between wireless IoT devices and Cloud platforms in production process. In: MMS 2018, Dubrovnik, November 06–08, 2018, 8 p.Google Scholar
- 5.Panda, A., et al. (2011). Optimalization of heat treatment bearings rings with goal to eliminate deformation of material. Chemické listy, 105(S), 459–461.Google Scholar
- 11.Dumont, M., &Wolf, D. (2019). Usage of MEMS capacitive acceleration sensors for structural monitoring. In Dynamics of Civil Structures, Vol 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- 13.Tomko, M., & Winter, S. (2019). Beyond digital twins – A commentary. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 395–399.Google Scholar
- 14.David, J., Lobov, A., & Lanz, M. (2018). Learning experiences involving digital twins. In IECON 2018 (pp. 3681–3686).Google Scholar
- 15.Martinez, G. S., et al. (2018). Automatic generation of a simulation-based digital twin of an industrial process plant. In IECON 2018 (pp. 3084–3089).Google Scholar
- 16.Khan, A., Dahl, M., Falkman, P., & Fabian, M. (2018). Digital twin for legacy systems: Simulation model testing and validation. In 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). (pp. 421–426). IEEE.Google Scholar
- 17.Shubenkova, K., et al. (2018). Possibility of digital twins technology for improving efficiency of the branded service system. In 2018 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.Google Scholar
- 19.Aissam, M., Benbrahim, M., Kabbaj, M. N. (2019). Cloud robotic: Opening a new road to the industry 4.0. In New Bioprocessing Strategies: Development and Manufacturing of Recombinant Antibodies and Proteins (pp.1–20). Google Scholar
- 20.Mahmoud, M. S. (2019). Architecture for cloud-based industrial automation. In Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 797. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- 22.Hrehova, S., & Vagaska, A. (2018). Design of study support to get skills in plant simulation tecnomatix environment. In: INTED 2018, Valencia, 5th–7th of March (pp. 7942–7945).Google Scholar