Advertisement

Classifying Teachers’ Self-reported Productivity, Stress and Indoor Environmental Quality Using Environmental Sensors

  • Johanna KallioEmail author
  • Elena Vildjiounaite
  • Vesa Kyllönen
  • Jussi Ronkainen
  • Jani Koivusaari
  • Salla Muuraiskangas
  • Pauli Räsänen
  • Heidi Similä
  • Kaisa Vehmas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11912)

Abstract

Considering that urban people spend majority of their time indoors, buildings should support health and productivity. However, quite commonly unsatisfactory Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) causes environmental stress, which can lead to adverse health outcomes and reduced productivity. First step to enable automatic environmental control is to recognise environmental conditions that can negatively influence each individual. To this end, we developed (1) multi-sensor IEQ monitoring system to measure objectively environmental quality; (2) mobile application to collect subjective evaluation of productivity, stress and IEQ data; (3) machine learning method to use IEQ data to distinguish between positive and negative self-reports of test subjects. Experimental results with real life data, collected in four classrooms of Finnish elementary school during 18 weeks, show that IEQ sensor data allows to classify with fairly high accuracy perceptions of teachers regarding their work productivity (91%), stress (81%) and IEQ (92%). This result was achieved in person-specific training (i.e., model of each individual was trained using only his/her data), whereas accuracy of leave-one-person-out approach was notably lower. These results suggest that perception is personal and some individuals are more sensitive to environmental stressors.

Keywords

Indoor environmental quality Machine learning Classification Productivity Stress Self-report 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the pilot participants for their active and significant role in the pilot. Special thanks to Mr. Jari Rehu, Mr. Severi Olsbo and our former colleague Mr. Dan Bendas. The study was implemented in collaboration with ESTABLISH and SCOTT projects. ESTABLISH (ITEA3 15008) was supported by Business Finland and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, and the pilot was designed in collaboration with UniqAir, CGI, and InspectorSec. SCOTT (Secure COnnected Trustable Things) has received funding from the Electronic Component Systems for European Leadership Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 737422. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and from Austria, Spain, Finland, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Netherlands, Belgium and Norway.

References

  1. 1.
    Kraus, M.: Exploring determining factors of indoor environment quality (IEQ). In: 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2018), Sofia, vol. 18, pp. 701–706 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steinemann, A., Wargocki, P., Rismanchi, B.: Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Build. Environ. 112, 351–358 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrousos, G.P.: Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5(7), 374 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisk, W.J.: Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annu. Rev. Energy Env. 25(1), 537–566 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., Elsarrag, E.: Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: a review of the literature. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(1), 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamb, S., Kwok, K.C.: A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers. Appl. Ergon. 52, 104–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geng, Y., Ji, W., Lin, B., Zhu, Y.: The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Build. Environ. 121, 158–167 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wargocki, P., Ten Wyon, D.P.: questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork. Build. Environ. 112, 359–366 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lan, L., Wargocki, P., Lian, Z.: Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort. Energy Build. 43(5), 1057–1062 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clausen, G., Wyon, D.P.: The combined effects of many different indoor environmental factors on acceptability and office work performance. HVAC&R Res. 14(1), 103–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, J., de Dear, R., Candido, C., Zhang, H., Arens, E.: Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Build. Environ. 70, 245–256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alberdi, A., Aztiria, A., Basarab, A.: Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: a review. J. Biomed. Inform. 59, 49–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    EFA. Indoor air quality. http://www.efanet.org/air-quality/indoor-air-quality. Accessed 03 Sept 2019
  15. 15.
    MCF-LW12CO2. https://www.mcf16.com/prodotto/mcf-lw12co2/. Accessed 03 Sept 2019
  16. 16.
    Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Health-related Conditions of Housing and Other Residential Buildings and Qualification Requirements for Third-party Experts (545/2015). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2015/en20150545.pdf. Accessed 07 June 2019
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Finell, E., et al.: The associations of indoor environment and psychosocial factors on the subjective evaluation of indoor air quality among lower secondary school students: a multilevel analysis. Indoor Air 27(2), 329–337 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al, H.Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., Elsarrag, E.: Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 105, 369–389 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    GAIA project. http://gaia-project.eu/index.php/en/gaia-objectives/. Accessed 03 Sept 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations