Advertisement

A Spanish Speaker and a Friend: Identity Transformation in Foreign Language Chat

  • Adam MendelsonEmail author
Chapter
  • 9 Downloads
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)

Abstract

Analysis of chat logs from a computer-mediated communication (CMC)-based tutoring project for students of Spanish as a foreign language reveals the online identity transformation of a focal student. Early in the project, the focal student presented himself as an inadequate Spanish speaker who was highly critical of his Spanish class. By the end of the project, he appeared as a content and competent learner who regularly spoke Spanish both in and out of class. Intertwined with his online transformation is evidence of a strengthening friendship with a classmate that spanned the chat room, the classroom and beyond. This case points to interpersonal relationships as a relevant factor in transfer between online and offline language learning and identity.

References

  1. Abrams, Z. I. (2003a). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams, Z. I. (2003b). Flaming in CMC: Prometheus’ fire or inferno’s? CALICO Journal, 20(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety (pp. 138–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beauvois, M. H. (1997). Write to speak: The effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 93–115). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). E-Talk: Computer-assisted classroom discussion—attitudes and motivation. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, K. Arens, & P. Markley (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 99–120). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Beavis, C. (2008). Critical review: L2 literacy and the design of self: A case study of a teenage writing on the internet. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1215–1227). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Bereiter, C. (1995). A dispositional view of transfer. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 21–34). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227–240.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00858.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual identity. In S. Johnson & U. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Compton, L. (2002). From chatting to confidence: A case study of the impact of online chatting on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate, confidence level and fluency in oral communication (Master’s thesis), Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  17. Compton, L. (2004). Using text chat to improve willingness to communicate. In J.-B. Son (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and practices (pp. 123–144). New York: iUniverse.Google Scholar
  18. Coniam, D., & Wong, R. (2004). Internet relay chat as a tool in the autonomous development of ESL learners’ English language ability: An exploratory study. System, 32, 321–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coupland, N. (2007). Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Danet, B. (2001). Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  22. Donath, J. (1998). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
  24. Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00113.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fung, A. (2006). Bridging cyberlife and real life: A study of online communities in Hong Kong. In D. Silver & A. Massanari (Eds.), Critical cyberculture studies (pp. 129–139). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gándara, P., & Orfield, G. (2010). A return to the “Mexican Room”: The segregation of Arizona’s English Learners: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, & Society, 8(2), 125–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2002). IRC Francais: The creation of an internet-based SLA community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(2), 109–134.  https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.2.109.8197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quality and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kramsch, C. (2002a). Introduction, “How can we tell the dancer from the dance?”. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 1–30). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002b). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  34. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65.Google Scholar
  36. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leander, K. M. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33–65). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  38. Leander, K. M., & Lewis, C. (2008). Literacy and internet technologies. In B. V. Street, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2: Literacy, pp. 53–70). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the ecology of learning. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization. Ecological perspectives (pp. 68–87). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  40. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lin, H. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401400041X
  42. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mendelson, A. (2014). Write to speak revisited: An ecological investigation of transfer between chatting and speaking in foreign languages. (Doctoral Dissertation), UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Boundaries / networks Me++. The cyborg self and the networked city. (pp. 7–17).Google Scholar
  45. Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–438). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Packer, M. (2001). The problem of transfer, and the sociocultural critique of schooling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 493–514.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1004new_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Parks, M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80–97.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  51. Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schiffrin, D. (2006). From linguistic reference to social reality. In A. deFina, D. Schiffrin, & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and identity (pp. 103–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spiliotopoulos, V., & Carey, S. (2005). Investigating the role of identity in writing using electronic bulletin boards. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 87–109.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.62.1.87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sykes, J. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
  57. Thorne, S., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, internet mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  59. Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
  62. Warschauer, M. (2000). Online learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching Concepts and practice (pp. 41–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weedon, C. (1987). Principles of poststructuralism: Feminist practice and post-structuralist theory (pp. 12–42). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations