Effect of Low-Plastic Fines Content on the Properties of Clean Sand

  • Abdallah I. Elgendy
  • Shehab S. AgaibyEmail author
  • Manal A. Salem
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


Physical properties of clean sand and pure clay are well established with different theories in the geotechnical literature; however, the properties of sand with fines soils are still not well determined and not fully understood. To address such matter, a series of laboratory tests were performed to investigate the effects of low-plastic silty/clayey fines on the engineering and mechanical properties of clean sand. Poorly graded clean sand was mixed with fines content percentages of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 40%. The results indicate that the shear strength parameters of tested sand measured using consolidated drained triaxial tests decrease with the increase of fines content. The internal friction angle dropped from 35° at 0% fines content to 26.86° at 40% fines content. As for the sand deformability, the modulus of elasticity (E50) measured at a confining pressure of 100 kPa dropped from a value of 12823 kPa at 0% fines content to 5720 kPa at 40% fines content. The void ratio decreased as fines content increased up to 15%, then increased dramatically with further increase in fines content. Finally, to investigate the potential of using sand with fines as backfill for mechanically stabilized earth walls, the effect of fines content on interface properties between sandy soils and geogrid is also investigated by collecting data from literature and conducting regression analyses to determine the interface strength reduction factor (Rinter) to be used in the numerical modeling of such walls.



Sincere thanks and appreciation are expressed to Dr. Mohamed El Kholy, Dr. Mohamed Kamal, and Eng. Islam Mamdouh for their support, valuable contribution, and guidance during conducting the experimental work.


  1. Abdelmawla, A., Sherif, O., Akl, S., Alashaal, A.: Analysis of laboratory pull-out experiment on geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of AIC SGE8, Structural Engineering Department, Alexandria University, vol. 1, pp. 64–72 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. ASTM D2435-2003: Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM D422-2007: Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D4253-2006: Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM D4254-2006: Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D7181-2011: Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D854-2010: Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  8. Cetin, H., Söylemez, M.: Soil-particle and pore orientations during drained and undrained shear of a cohesive sandy silt clay soil. Can. Geotech. J. 41(6), 1127–1138 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duszyńska, A., Bolt, A.F.: Pullout tests of geogrids embedded in non-cohesive soil. Arch. Hydro-Eng. Environ. Mech. 51(2), 135–147 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Hegde, A., Roy, R.: A comparative numerical study on soil-geosynthetic interactions using large scale direct shear test and pullout test. Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 4(1), 2 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hossain, M.S., Kibria, G., Khan, M.S., Hossain, J., Taufiq, T.: Effects of backfill soil on excessive movement of MSE wall. J. Perform. Constructed Facil. 26(6), 793–802 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsieh, C.W., Chen, G.H., Wu, J.H.: The shear behavior obtained from the direct shear and pullout tests for different poor graded soil-geosynthetic systems. J. GeoEng. 6(1), 15–26 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Islam, T., Islam, M.A., Islam, M.S., Abedin, M.Z.: Effect of fine content on shear strength behavior of sandy soil. In: Proceedings of 14th Global Engineering and Technology Conference. BIAM Foundation, 63 Eskaton, Dhaka, Bangladesh (2017). ISBN: 978-1-925488-60-9Google Scholar
  14. Lentz, R.W., Pyatt, J.N.: Pull-out resistance of geogrids in sand. Transp. Res. Rec. 1188 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. Moraci, N., Cardile, G., Gioffrè, D.: A theoretical method to predict the pullout behavior of extruded geogrids embedded in granular soils. In: Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, vol. 14, p. 16 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Najjar, S.S., Yaghi, K., Adwan, M., Jaoude, A.A.R.A.: Drained shear strength of compacted sand with clayey fines. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 9(5), 513–520 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phan, V.T.A., Hsiao, D.H., Nguyen, P.T.L.: Effects of fines contents on engineering properties of sand-fines mixtures. Procedia Eng. 142, 213–220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi, D., Wang, F.: Pull-out test studies on the interface characteristics between geogrids and soils. EJGE 18, 5405–5417 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. Skempton, A.W.: The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Geotechnique 4(4), 143–147 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sukmak, K., Han, J., Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S.: Numerical parametric study on behavior of bearing reinforcement earth walls with different backfill material properties. Geosynthetics Int. 23(6), 435–451 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Touahmia, M., Rouili, A., Boukendakdji, M., Achour, B.: Experimental and numerical analysis of geogrid-reinforced soil systems. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43(10), 5295–50303 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, H.L., Chen, R.P., Liu, Q.W., Kang, X., Wang, Y.W.: Soil–geogrid interaction at various influencing factors by pullout tests with applications of FBG sensors. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31(1), 04018342 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdallah I. Elgendy
    • 1
  • Shehab S. Agaiby
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manal A. Salem
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations