Advertisement

A Density-Dependent Constitutive Model of Rockfill as Well as a Dynamic Contact Technique for Simulation of Dynamic Compaction with MPM

  • Ruiyu ZhangEmail author
  • Erxiang Song
  • Abbas Haider
  • Yujin Sun
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of rockfill under strong impact is highly nonlinear which results in grain breakage. In this paper, a simple but valid constitutive model for rockfill considering grain breakage is proposed and used to simulate the dynamic compaction process using material point method (MPM) which has proven to be suitable for large deformation problems. A useful dynamic contact algorithm is developed to achieve an automatic adjustment of the rigid body velocity so that the rigid model assumption of the hammer is still valid. The simulation results are verified using the test data from the construction site of Chengde Airport China. Later, the influence of soft substratum on the distribution of volumetric strain, volumetric compression plastic strain energy density and the historical maximum mean compressive stress in deep improvement zone is investigated. The usual ellipsoidal distributions of these three parameters are cut-off by the soft substratum and are observed to be semi-ellipsoidal in the soft substratum after dynamic compaction. There is a decrease of the volume compression plastic strain energy density and the historical maximum mean compressive stress under the interface, which is explained by a simple 1-D case where the stress wave is reflected and refracted on the interface of two different linear elastic materials.

Keywords

Rockfill Dynamic contact Grain breakage Material point method Dynamic compaction Soft substratum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Fundamental Research Program of China (No. 2014CB047003).

References

  1. Bauer, E.: Calibration of a comprehensive hypoplastic model for granular materials. Soils Found. 36(1), 13–26 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.13
  2. Brackbill, J.U., Ruppel, H.M.: FLIP: a method for adaptively zoned, particle-in-cell calculations of fluid flows in two dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 65(2), 314–343 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(86)90211-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chow, Y., Yong, D., Yong, K., Lee, S.: Dynamic compaction analysis. J. Geotech. Eng. 118(8), 1141–1157 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1992)118:8(1141)
  4. Cundall, P.: Explicit finite difference method in geomechanics. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Blacksburg (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, J.M.: Particle simulation of plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. 55(2), 403 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.55.403
  6. Ghassemi, A., Pak, A., Shahir, H.: Numerical study of the coupled hydro-mechanical effects in dynamic compaction of saturated granular soils. Comput. Geotech. 37(1–2), 10–24 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gu, Q., Lee, F.-H.: Ground response to dynamic compaction of dry sand. Géotechnique 52(7), 481–493 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.7.481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gudehus, G.: A comprehensive constitutive equation for granular materials. Soils Found. 36(1), 1–12 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.1
  9. Harlow, F.H., Evans, M.: A machine calculation method for hydrodynamic problems (1955)Google Scholar
  10. Kafaji, I.K.a.: Formulation of a dynamic material point method (MPM) for geomechanical problems (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Ma, X., Giguere, P.T., Jayaraman, B., Zhang, D.Z.: Distribution coefficient algorithm for small mass nodes in material point method. J. Comput. Phys. 229(20), 7819–7833 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menard, L., Broise, Y.: Theoretical and practical aspects of dynamic consolidation. In: Ground Treatment by Deep Compaction, pp. 3–18. Thomas Telford Publishing (1976)Google Scholar
  13. Nairn, J.: Modeling imperfect interfaces in the material point method using multimaterial methods. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 1(1), 1–15 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Pan, J., Selby, A.: Simulation of dynamic compaction of loose granular soils. Adv. Eng. Softw. 33(7–10), 631–640 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(02)00067-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poran, C.J., Rodriguez, J.A.: Finite element analysis of impact behavior of sand. Soils Found. 32(4), 68–80 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.4_68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., Schreyer, H.L.: A particle method for history-dependent materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 118(1–2), 179–196 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)90112-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun, Y., Song, E.: Simulation of large-displacement landslide by material point method. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 37(7), 1218–1225 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. Wang, Z.-Q., Deng, X.-I.: Mechanism of dynamic consolidation and its environmental effect. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, 6 May 1984Google Scholar
  19. Yao, Y., Zhang, B.: Reinforcement range of dynamic compaction based on volumetric strain. Rock Soil Mech. 37(9), 2663–2671 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. Zhang, D.Z., Ma, X., Giguere, P.T.: Material point method enhanced by modified gradient of shape function. J. Comput. Phys. 230(16), 6379–6398 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.04.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang, R., Sun, Y., Song, E.: Simulation of dynamic compaction using material point method and analysis of its energy conversion law. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 41(7) (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruiyu Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Erxiang Song
    • 1
  • Abbas Haider
    • 1
  • Yujin Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations