Do Top Social Apps Effect Voice Call? Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Methods

  • Hao Jiang
  • Min Lin
  • Bingqing LiuEmail author
  • Huifang Liu
  • Yuanyuan ZengEmail author
  • He Nai
  • Xiaoli Zhang
  • Xianlong Zhao
  • Wen Du
  • Haining Ye
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11910)


The various mobile social APPs greatly enrich the way people communicate with each other. It has been argued that the use of mobile social APPs may influence user mobile phone call behaviour, as more and more people are used to using mobile social APPs for voice or video calls. Although mobile social APPs has penetrated into every aspect of our daily lives, so far there is no convincing research showing how the mobile social APPs influence the use of traditional mobile phone calls. Based on the potential outcomes model, we use the potential outcomes model to study the causal effects of the frequent use of mobile social APPs on mobile phone calls. The propensity score matching method is performed for bias adjustment. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis is conducted to test whether the results remained robust in the presence of hidden biases. The results suggest statistically significant positive effects of frequent use of Wechat on traditional mobile phone calls. But for QQ, we found that frequent use of QQ reduces mobile phone calls. The conclusion provides a new theoretical feature for business package recommendation, namely, the frequency of mobile social APPs. For WeChat users who use WeChat frequently, they are more inclined to provide business package containing high call duration, and for QQ users who use QQ frequently, they are more inclined to provide business package containing low call duration, which further enriches the method of business package recommendation.


Mobile social APPs Mobile phone calls Causal influence Propensity score matching 


  1. 1.
    Althoff, T., Jindal, P., Leskovec, J.: Online actions with offline impact: how online social networks influence online and offline user behavior (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atzmueller, M.: Analyzing and grounding social interaction in online and offline networks. In: Calders, T., Esposito, F., Hüllermeier, E., Meo, R. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8726, pp. 485–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Austin, P.C.: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3), 399–424 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, M., Kraut, R.E.: The relationship between facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength: Facebook and well-being. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 21(4), 265–281 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunbar, R.I.: Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? R. Soc. Open Sci. 3(1), 150292 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunbar, R.I.M., Arnaboldi, V., Conti, M., Passarella, A.: The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Soc. Netw. 43, 39–47 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gwenn Schurgin, O., Kathleen, C.P.: The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 127(4), 800 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu, J.Y., Small, D.S., Rosenbaum, P.R.: Effect modification and design sensitivity in observational studies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 108(501), 135–148 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laranjo, L., et al.: The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(1), 243–256 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meng, J.: Your health buddies matter: preferential selection and social influence on weight management in an online health social network. Health Commun. 31(12), 1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oh, H.J., Ozkaya, E., Larose, R.: How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30(1), 69–78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reich, S.M., Subrahmanyam, K., Espinoza, G.: Friending, iming, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Dev. Psychol. 48(2), 356 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenbaum, P.R.: Design of Observational Studies (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sabatini, F., Sarracino, F.: Online social networks and trust. Soc. Indicat. Res. 2, 1–32 (2015) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi, J., Salmon, C.T.: Identifying opinion leaders to promote organ donation on social media: network study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20(1), e7 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song, H., et al.: Does facebook make you lonely?: A meta analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36(36), 446–452 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Utz, S.: The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 1–10 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Westreich, D., Lessler, J., Funk, M.J.: Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63(8), 826–833 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yadav, M., Joshi, Y., Rahman, Z.: Mobile social media: the new hybrid element of digital marketing communications. Proc. - Soc. Behav. Sci. 189, 335–343 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang, S., Wang, B., Lu, Y.: Exploring the dual outcomes of mobile social networking service enjoyment: the roles of social self-efficacy and habit. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 486–496 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Jiang
    • 1
  • Min Lin
    • 2
  • Bingqing Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Huifang Liu
    • 2
  • Yuanyuan Zeng
    • 1
    Email author
  • He Nai
    • 1
  • Xiaoli Zhang
    • 1
  • Xianlong Zhao
    • 3
  • Wen Du
    • 4
  • Haining Ye
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Electronic InformationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.China United Telecommunications Co., Ltd.GuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Beijing Smart Chip Microelectronics Co., Ltd.BeijingChina
  4. 4.Shanghai DS Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations