Advertisement

An Energy Efficient Glowworm Swarm Optimized Opportunistic Routing in MANET

  • D. SathiyaEmail author
  • S. Sheeja
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 38)

Abstract

A mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is a decentralized network where the MN is moved randomly. Every mobile node (MN) in network is joined wirelessly. Owing to random movement of MN in network, energy efficient routing is major issues because the MN has lesser battery power. Energy Efficient Glowworm Swarm Optimization based Opportunistic Routing (EEGWSO-OR) technique is designed to improve routing in MANET. Initially the numbers of glowworms (i.e., mobile nodes) are randomly created. Each glowworm has luminescence quantity (i.e., energy) called luciferin. For opportunistic routing process, MN chooses nearest node to transfer the data packets. The fitness of each mobile is computed for selecting the optimal one with the threshold energy level. This assists to enhance network lifetime (NL). After finding the energy optimized node, the neighboring node is determined using stepwise regression by transmitting the route request and reply messages. Followed by, route path from source to destination is determined with minimum distance. The data packets (DP) are transmitted after the route discovery process, to destination MN without any duplicate transmission. This assists in enhance the data packet delivery and lessens the routing overhead (RO). Experimental analysis is performed with diverse parameters namely energy consumption (EC), NL, data packet delivery ratio (DPDR) and RO with number of MN and DP. The simulation outcome evident that EEGWSO-OR improves the NL, DPDR and lessens EC and RO as evaluated with conventional methods.

Keywords

MANET Routing Energy consumption Glowworm Swarm Optimization Route discovery Stepwise regression 

References

  1. 1.
    Hao, S., Zhang, H., Song, M.: A LASEERA for MANET. J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 3(2), 52–66 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, J., Tan, H., Deng, Y., Cui, L., Liu, D.: ACECR for mobile ad hoc networks under different node mobility models. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 105, 2–8 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Das, S.K., Tripathi, S.: Intelligent energy-aware efficient routing for MANET. Wirel. Netw. 24(4), 1139–1159 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh, G., Kumar, N., Verma, A.K.: ANTALG: an innovative ACO based routing algorithm for MANETs. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 45, 151–167 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jamali, S., Rezaei, L., Gudakahriz, S.J.: An energy-efficient routing protocol for MANETs: a particle swarm optimization approach. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 11(6), 803–812 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu, T., Zhu, J.: Genetic algorithm for energy-efficient QoS multicast routing. IEEE Commun. Lett. 17(1), 31–34 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, M., Yang, M., Wu, Q., Zheng, R., Zhu, J.: Smart perception and autonomic optimization: a novel bio-inspired hybrid routing protocol for MANETs. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 81, 505–513 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Maqbali, H., Day, K., Ould-Khaoua, M., Touzene, A., Alzeidi, N.: A new hybrid grid-based routing approach for MANETS. Procedia Technol. 17, 81–89 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Fan, Q., Chen, B.: Reliable ant colony routing algorithm for dual-channel mobile ad hoc networks. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    AlQarni, B.H., AlMogren, A.S.: Reliable and energy efficient protocol for MANET multicasting. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2016, 1–13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hassan, M.H., Muniyandi, R.C.: An improved hybrid technique for energy and delay routing in mobile ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 12, 134–139 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, S.M., Nilavalan, R., Sallama, A.F.: A novel approach for reliable route discovery in mobile ad-hoc network. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 83(2), 1519–1529 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao, M., Singh, N.: Energy efficient QoS aware hierarchical KF-MAC routing protocol in MANET. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 101(2), 635–648 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, X.M., Wang, E.B., Xia, J.J., Sung, D.K.: A neighbor coverage-based probabilistic rebroadcast for reducing RO in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 12(3), 424–433 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taha, A., Alsaqour, R., Uddin, M., Abdelhaq, M., Saba, T.: Energy efficient multipath routing protocol for MANET using the fitness function. IEEE Access 5, 10369–10381 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carvalho, T., Júnior, J.J., Francês, R.: A new cross-layer routing with energy awareness in hybrid mobile ad hoc networks: a fuzzy-based mechanism. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 63, 1–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pathak, S., Jain, S.: A novel weight based clustering algorithm for routing in MANET. Wirel. Netw. 22(8), 2695–2704 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pratapa Reddy, A., Satyanarayana, N.: Energy-efficient stable multipath routing in MANET. Wirel. Netw. 23(7), 2083–2091 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu, Z.-Y., Song, H.-T.: Ant-based energy-aware disjoint multipath routing algorithm for MANETs. Comput. J. 53(2), 166–176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarkar, S., Datta, R.: An adaptive protocol for stable and energy-aware routing in MANETs. IETE Tech. Rev. 34(4), 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKarpagam Academy of Higher EducationCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations