Advertisement

Activity Classifier: A Novel Approach Using Naive Bayes Classification

  • G. MuneeswariEmail author
  • D. Daniel
  • K. Natarajan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 98)

Abstract

Activity movements have been recognized in various applications for elderly needs, athletes activities measurements and various fields of real time environments. In this paper, a novel idea has been proposed for the classification of some of the day to day activities like walking, running, fall forward, fall backward etc. All the movements are captured using a Light Blue Bean device incorporated with a Bluetooth module and a tri-axial acceleration sensor. The acceleration sensor continuously reads the activities of a person and the Arduino is designed to continuously read the values of the sensor that works in collaboration with a mobile phone or computer. For the effective classification of a person’s activity correctly, Naïve Bayes Classifier is used. The entire Arduino along with acceleration sensor can be easily attached to the foot of a person right at the beginning of the user starts performing any activity. For the evaluation purpose, mainly four protocols are considered like walking, running, falling in the forward direction and falling in the backward direction. Initially five healthy adults were taken for the sample test. The results obtained are consistent in the various test cases and the device showed an overall accuracy of 90.67%.

Keywords

Acceleration sensor Bluetooth Low Energy Internet of Things Activity classifier Naive Bayes Classification 

References

  1. 1.
    Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I.: Internet of Things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. Int. J. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siekkinen, M., Hiienkari, M., Nurminen, J.K., Nieminen, J.: How low energy is Bluetooth low energy? Comparative measurements with ZigBee/802.15.4 2012. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops, pp. 232–237 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, Z., Becker, E., Arora, R., Athitsos, V.: Experiments with computer vision methods for fall detection. In: PETRA ’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varkey, J.P., Pompili, D., Walls, T.A.: Human motion recognition using wireless sensor based wearable system. J. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 23(4), 234–239 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, F., Zhao, H., Zhao, Y., Zhong, H.: Development of a wearable-sensor-based fall detection system. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2015(576364), 11 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yun, J., Lee, S.-S.: Human movement detection and identification using pyroelectric infrared sensors. Sensors 14, 8057–8081 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, J., Chen, C., Ma, Y., Xu, Y.: Energy analysis of device discovery for Bluetooth low energy. In: IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashari, A., Paryudi, I., Tjoa, A.M.: Performance comparision between Naïve Bayes, descision tree and k-nearest neighbour in searching in an energy simulation tool. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(11) (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, X., Barkhaus, P., Rymer, W., Zhou, P.: Machine learning for supporting diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using surface electromyogram. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22(1), 96–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hajian-Tilaki, K.: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 4(2), 627–635 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viswanath, N., Pakyala, N.V., Muneeswari, G.: Smart-foot device for women safety. In: IEEE TENSYMP 2016, Sanur, Bali Island, Indonesia (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Viswanath, N., Pakyala, N.V., Muneeswari, G.: The design and development of an automated fall detection system for geriatrics. In: Proceedings of BSSI. Indian Institute of Technology Madras (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank, V.J., Muneeswari, G.: A novel approach for gait analysis using activity classifier for medical analysis. Biomed. Res. (Spec. Issue) 20(1) (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Constantinescu, Z., Vladoiu, M.: Challenges in safety, security, and privacy in the development of vehicle tracking system. In: 17th International Conference System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CSE, Faculty of EngineeringChrist (Deemed to be) UniversityBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations