Advertisement

How Software Startup Teams Reflect: Approaches, Triggers and Challenges

  • Dron KhannaEmail author
  • Xiaofeng Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

Learning from experience is essential for software startup teams. To obtain experiential learning, reflection should be conducted on experience. The existing research on reflection in software startups is much limited. In this study, we focused on reflection in software startup teams and identified formats, triggers and challenges used in such a context. To achieve this, we defined a conceptual framework of reflection. We conducted a multiple case study and analyzed the data obtained from two software startups. The initial finding shows that software startups do perform reflection of different types based on the factors like team size and collocation. We also found two new formats, three triggers and three challenges of reflection in software startups. Reflection sessions conducted by startups could mean tough moments, confrontations and sometimes involve the ego of team members. To conduct the session, it is important to be open, honest, raise key affair and straight to the point.

Keywords

Software startups Reflection Experience Learning Experiential learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Books (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giardino, C., Bajwa, S.S., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: Key challenges in early-stage software startups. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds.) XP 2015. LNBIP, vol. 212, pp. 52–63. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le Roux, I., Steyn, B.: Experiential learning and critical reflection as a tool for transfer of business knowledge: an empirical case study of a start-up simulation intervention for nascent entrepreneurs. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 10(3), 330–347 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seppänen, P., Liukkunen, K., Oivo, M.: On the feasibility of startup models as a framework for research on competence needs in software startups. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 569–576. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dewey, J.: Experience and education. In: The Educational Forum, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 241–252. Taylor & Francis Group (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience As the Source of Learning and Development. FT press, Upper Saddle River (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fowler, J.: Experiential learning and its facilitation. Nurse Educ. Today 28(4), 427–433 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andresen, L., Boud, D., Cohen, R.: Experience-based learning. Underst. Adult Educ. Train. 2, 225–239 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D.: Reflection: Turning Experience Into Learning. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daudelin, M.W.: Learning from experience through reflection. Organ. Dyn. 24(3), 36–48 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beard, C., Wilson, J.P.: The Power of Experiential Learning: A Handbook for Trainers and Educators. Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Politis, D.: The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29(4), 399–424 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cope, J.: Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higherlevel’ learning. Manag. Learn. 34(4), 429–450 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Degeling, M., Prilla, M.: Modes of collaborative reflection (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prilla, M., Degeling, M., Herrmann, T.: Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 55–64 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knipfer, K., Prilla, M., Cress, U., Herrmann, T.: Computer support for collaborative reflection on captured teamwork data. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 938–939 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prilla, M.: Supporting collaborative reflection at work: a socio-technical analysis. AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(1), 1–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borton, T.: Reach, Touch, and Teach. Saturday Rev. (1969) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rolfe, G.: Reach touch and teach. Nurse Educ. Today 4(34), 488–489 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gibbs, G.: Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. Further Education Unit (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finlay, L.: Reflecting on reflective practice. PBPL Pap. 52, 1–27 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greenaway, R.: Reviewing by doing. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Lead. 9(1), 21–25 (1992)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collier, P.J., Williams, D.R.: Reflection in action. In: Cress, C.R., Collier, P.J. (eds.) no. 50, pp. 83–97 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mälkki, K.: Building on Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning: Theorizing the challenges to reflection. J. Transform. Educ. 8(1), 42–62 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mezirow, J.: Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning (1991)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fook, J., Askeland, G.A.: Challenges of critical reflection: ‘Nothing ventured, nothing gained’. Soc. Work. Educ. 26(5), 520–533 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harms, R.: Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: learning in a lean startup environment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 100, 21–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations