Advertisement

Does Self-efficacy Matter? On the Correlation of Self-efficacy and Creativity in IT Education

  • Juhani RiskuEmail author
  • Kai-Kristian Kemell
  • Joni Kultanen
  • Polina Feschenko
  • Jeroen Carelse
  • Krista Korpikoski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

Self-efficacy belief affects humans in life, action and work. Higher self-efficacy enables stronger contribution in fulfilling tasks, helping others in a team, and survive when facing obstacles and failures. Also creativity correlates to higher self-efficacy. At the same time, design is a powerful skill in note-making, improving the student’s understanding of the undergoing topic in a class. Note-making, when consisting of recorded writings, self-drawn images and other supportive subjects like structural analyses, charts, ad-hoc notes, detailed features and verbal links to related themes, forms a fundamental skill and ability in learning and applying new motifs and patterns. We executed during a design class an experiment with 22 students from various faculties at two universities by designing and creating visual notebooks. The students acted as designers and visualizers communicating to themselves and their teams with own creations. These notebooks were analyzed and reflected against the questionnaire results to evaluate the impact of the course in the progress in design skills and creativity.

Keywords

Self-efficacy Creativity Note-making Education Design 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlin, B., Drnovsek, M., Hisrich, R.D.: Entrepreneurs’ creativity and firm innovation: the moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Small Bus. Econ. 43, 101–117 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khedhaouria, A., Gurâu, C., Torrès, O.: Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Small Bus. Econ. 44(3), 485–504 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graziotin, D., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering. PeerJ 2, e289 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carberry, A.R., Gerber, E.M., Martin, C.K.: Measuring the innovation self-efficacy of engineers. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 34(2B), 590–598 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran, V.S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, pp. 71–81. Academic Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M.: Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 39(5), 1154–1184 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amabile, T.M.: Social psychology and creativity: a consensual assessment technique. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43, 997–1013 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, M.: Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: a meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108, 25–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forgeard, M.J.: Happy people thrive on adversity: pre-existing mood moderates the effect of emotion inductions on creative thinking. Pers. Individ. Differ. 51, 904–909 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaufman, J.C., Lee, J., Baer, J., Lee, S.: Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: new evidence of reliability. Think. Skills Creat. 2, 96–106 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M.: Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Manag. J. 45, 1137–1148 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathisen, G.E., Bronnick, K.S.: Creative self-efficacy: an intervention study. Int. J. Educ. Res. 48(1), 21–29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neville, C.: Effective Note-making. University of Bradford, School of Management, Digital Publication (2006, 2014). https://www.slideshare.net/itamardorneles/effectivenotemaking
  14. 14.
    Buzan, T., Buzan, B.: The Mind Map Book. BBC Worldwide Limited, London. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2010). ISBN 10 1406647160Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freedman, D., Pisani, R., Purves, R., Adhikari, A.: Statistics, 2nd edn, pp. 133–139. Norton & Company, Inc., New York (1978)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weinberg, S.L., Knapp, S.A.: Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS, p. 425. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Risku, J., Abrahamsson, P.: What can software startuppers learn from the artistic design flow? Experiences, reflections and future avenues. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 584–599. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Carelse Ltd.HattulaFinland
  3. 3.University of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations