Advertisement

Evaluating Fiber Detection Models Using Neural Networks

  • Silvia MiramontesEmail author
  • Daniela M. UshizimaEmail author
  • Dilworth Y. ParkinsonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11845)

Abstract

Ceramic matrix composites are resistant materials that withstand high temperatures, but quality control of such composites depends on microtomography image analysis to enable the spatial analysis of fibers, matrix cracks detection, among others. While there are several approaches for fiber detection from microtomography, materials scientists lack computational schemes to validate the accuracy of different fiber detection models. This paper proposes a set of statistical methods to analyse images of CMC in 3D and visualize respective fiber beds, including a lossless data reduction algorithm. The main contribution is our method based on a convolutional neural network that enables evaluation of results from automated fiber detection models, particularly when compared with human curated datasets. We build all the algorithms using free tools to allow full reproducibility of the experiments, and illustrate our results using algorithms designed to probe sample content from gigabyte-size image volumes with minimalistic computational infrastructure.

Keywords

Computer vision Materials science CNN 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF3834 and by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation through Grant 2013-10-27 to the University of California, Berkeley. Algorithmic work is partially supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) Early Career Award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views of DOE or the University of California.

References

  1. 1.
    Araujo, F.H., et al.: Reverse image search for scientific data within and beyond the visible spectrum. Expert Syst. Appl. 109, 35–48 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bale, H.A., et al.: Real-time quantitative imaging of failure events in materials under load at temperatures above 1,600 c. Nat. Mater. 12, 40–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaiszik, B., Chard, K., Pruyne, J., Ananthakrishnan, R., Tuecke, S., Foster, I.: The materials data facility: data services to advance materials science research. J. Mater. 68(8), 2045–2052 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox, B.N., et al.: Stochastic virtual test systems for ceramic matrix composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 479–529 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gardiner, G.: The next generation of ceramic matrix composites (2017). https://www.compositesworld.comblog/post/the-next-generation-of-ceramic-matrix-composites
  6. 6.
    Hanwell, M.D., et al.: OpenChemistry/tomviz: Tomviz 1.3.0 Release Candidate 2, April 2018Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kluyver, T., et al.: Jupyter notebooks-a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, p. 87 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larson, N., Cuellar, C., Zok, F.: X-ray computed tomography of microstructure evolution during matrix impregnation and curing in 2 unidirectional fiber beds. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 117, 243–259 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larson, N., Zok, F.: Insights from in-situ x-ray computed tomography during axial impregnation of unidirectional fiber beds. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 107, 124–134 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larson, N., Zok, F.: In-situ 3D visualization of composite microstructure during polymer-to-ceramic conversion. Acta Mater. 144, 579–589 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larson, N.M., Zok, F.W.: Ex-situ XCT dataset for x-ray computed tomography of microstructure evolution during matrix impregnation and curing in unidirectional fiber beds.  https://doi.org/10.18126/M2QM0Z (2019)
  12. 12.
    LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rasband, W.: ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (1997–2018). https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
  14. 14.
    Ridler, T., Calvard, S.: Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 8(8), 630–632 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations