Advertisement

Education Methods

  • Sachit A. PatelEmail author
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we summarize several methods utilized in simulation training. Although the list of examples given is not exhaustive, it highlights the modalities most often used in a successful training program. Moreover, there should be an emphasis made that level of fidelity does not always correlate with mobility. Small focused trainers are easily moved, but have limitations on breadth of education. Conversely, the wide range of applications and variety of targeted audiences that can be reached by virtual training platforms may be outweighed by limitations in mobility. Careful planning, an understanding of available tools, and an understanding of learning objectives can lead to a successful mobile simulation program with the greatest benefit to its learners.

Keywords

Fidelity Standardized patient Mannequin Virtual reality Haptic 

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper JB, Taqueti VR. A brief history of the development of manikin simulators for clinical education and training. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i11–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2010;17(1):35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis M, Hanson J, Dickinson M, Lees L, Pimblett M. How to teach using simulation in healthcare. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ. 1964;39:802–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LCME Annual Questionare Part II. 2011. www.aamc.org/cirriculumreports. Accessed 05 May 2019.
  6. 6.
    Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest. 2008;133(1):56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fraser K, Wright B, Girard L, Tworek J, Paget M, Welikovich L, et al. Simulation training improves diagnostic performance on a real patient with similar clinical findings. Chest. 2011;139(2):376–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayo PH, Hackney JE, Mueck JT, Ribaudo V, Schneider RF. Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(12):2422–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodgers DL, Securro S Jr, Pauley RD. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on educational outcomes in an advanced cardiovascular life support course. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(4):200–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoadley TA. Learning advanced cardiac life support: a comparison study of the effects of low- and high-fidelity simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30(2):91–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zapko KA, Ferranto MLG, Blasiman R, Shelestak D. Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;60:28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nebraska Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Blood and Marrow TransplantationOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations