Advertisement

Modeling Data Driven Interactions on Property Graph

  • Worapol Alex PongpechEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11871)

Abstract

Data Driven Transformation is a process where an organization transforms its infrastructure, strategies, operational methods, technologies, or organizational culture to facilitate and encourage data driven decision-making behaviors. We defined a data driven network as group/groups of people in an organization network working on common projects where making data driven decisions is necessary in the project. One important problem in data driven transformation is how to understand data driven behaviors in the network. Ability to model and compute on a DDIG is crucial for understanding data driven network behaviors. To this end, we modeled a data driven network as a property graph, in which nodes represent users, projects, or data sources and edges represent interactions between them. We termed this Data Driven Interactions Graph and modeled on the Neo4j graph platform. A graph model framework to represent data driven interactions such that a number of network properties can be computed from the proposed graph is introduced. Finally, we discussed data utilization and data collaboration behaviors of the social working network.

Keywords

Data Driven Transformation Collaboration Utilization Property graph Social network analysis Clustering Communities Neo4j 

References

  1. 1.
    Pentland, A., Liu, A.: Modeling and prediction of human behavior. Neural Comput. 11(1), 229–242 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadilek, A.: Modeling human behavior at a large scale. Ph.D. thesis, Rochester, NY, USA (2012). AAI3543317Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood, D.J., Gray, B.: Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 27(2), 139–162 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milojević, S.: How are academic age, productivity and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers? PLoS ONE 7(11), 1–13 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hsieh, J.Y., Liou, K.T.: Collaborative leadership and organizational performance: assessing the structural relation in a public service agency. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 38(1), 83–109 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Odda, T.: On properties of a well-known graph or what is your ramsey number? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 328(1), 166–172 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A.: Some analyses of Erdős collaboration graph. Soc. Netw. 22, 173–186 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung, F.R.K., Lu, L.: Complex graphs and networks. In: NSF-CBMS Regional Research Conference on the Combinatorics of Large Sparse Graphs, held at California State University San Marcos, 7–12 June 2004 (2006) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malbas, V.S.R.: Mapping the collaboration networks of biomedical research in Southeast Asia. PeerJ PrePrints 3, e936v1 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duch, J., Arenas, A.: Community detection in complex networks using extremal optimization. Phys. Rev. E 72, 027104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, J., Leskovec, J.: Community-affiliation graph model for overlapping network community detection. In: 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 1170–1175, December 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leung, I.X.Y., Hui, P., Liò, P., Crowcroft, J.: Towards real-time community detection in large networks. Phys. Rev. E 79, 066107 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Angles, R.: The property graph database model. In: AMW (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neo4j: The neo4j graph algorithms user guide v3.5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Analytic and Data Science Graduate Program, Faculty of Applied StatisticsNIDABangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations