Factors Influence the Intention to Use E-Portfolio in Saudi Technical and Vocational Training Corporation (TVTC) Sector: Pilot Review

  • Saeed Matar AlshahraniEmail author
  • Hazura Mohamed
  • Muriati Mukhtar
  • Umi Asma’ Mokhtar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1073)


The major issue that institutions of technical and vocational training corporation (TVTC) are currently facing is inefficient management of information. In this context, the application of OBE entails the provision of several portfolios to students and they are used to generate daily information, with records stored as transaction evidence. Studies in literature on e-portfolio system framework in the education sector, and particularly the TVTC, are still few and far between and their extent failed to cover the determination of the factors that influence the system’s adoption. Therefore, in this paper, the main significant factors might influence e-portfolio adoption among TVTC institutions were identified, on the basis of which, a framework was developed and proposed in order to facilitate technology adoption and enhance outcomes.


e-Portfolio Education productivity Adoption Technical and vocational training Saudi Arabia 


  1. 1.
    Laird, T.F.N., Kuh, G.D.: Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Res. High. Educ. 46(2), 211–233 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turney, C., et al.: Using technology to direct learning in higher education: the way forward? Act. Learn. High Educ. 10(1), 71–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merigó Lindahl, J.M., López-Jurado, M.P., Gracia Ramos, M.C.: A decision making method for educational management based on distance measures. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa 8, 29–49 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: Electronic records management and its importance for decision making process in Yemeni higher professional education (HPE): a preliminary review. In: 1st International Conference of Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technologies (IRICT 2014), Johor Bahru, pp. 105–114 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The role of electronic records management (ERM) for supporting Decision making process in yemeni higher professional education (HPE): a preliminary review. Jurnal Teknologi 73(2), 117–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: Factors influencing the adoption of electronic records management (ERM) for decision making process at higher professional education (HPE)’s institutions. In: 1st ICRIL-International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology (lICIST 2015), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 399–403 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mukred, M., et al.: Electronic records management system adoption readiness framework for higher professional education institutions in Yemen. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 6(6), 804–811 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The performance of educational institutions through the electronic records management systems: factors influencing electronic records management system adoption. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag. (IJITPM) 9(3), 34–51 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eze Asogwa, B.: The readiness of universities in managing electronic records: a study of three federal universities in Nigeria. Electron. Libr. 31(6), 792–807 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Şuşnea, E.: Improving decision making process in universities: a conceptual model of intelligent decision support system. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 76, 795–800 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Samsudin, A., Miah, S., McGrath, G.: An ontology-based record management systems approach for enhancing decision support (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atulomah, B.C.: Perceived records management practice and decision making among university administrators in Nigeria (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eusoff, R., Yusof, Z.M.: Development of records management system for matriculation colleges in Malaysia. Asia-Pac. J. Inf. Technol. Multimedia 11(1) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gröger, S., Decker, J., Schumann, M.: Do universities get the hang of working efficiently?–a survey of the influencing factors on the adoption of electronic document and workflow management in German-speaking countries (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tzeng, W.-S., et al.: Do ePortfolios contribute to learners’ reflective thinking activities?: a preliminary study of nursing staff users. J. Med. Syst. 39(9), 1–10 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alharthi, E.F.J.: Teacher evaluation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s (KSA) schools-moving forward. University of Southampton (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hase, S., Galt, J.: Records management myopia: a case study. Rec. Manag. J. 21(1), 36–45 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammed, F., Ibrahim, O., Ithnin, N.: Factors influencing cloud computing adoption for e-government implementation in developing countries: instrument development. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 18(3), 297–327 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mohammed, F., et al.: Cloud computing fitness for E-Government implementation: importance-performance Analysis. IEEE access 6, 1236–1248 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Almazroi, A.A., Shen, H., Mohammed, F.: The impact of trust on the adoption of cloud computing services by university students. In: International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moseti, I.: Digital preservation and institutional repositories: case study of universities in Kenya. J. S. Afr. Soc. Arch. 49, 137–154 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosweu, O., Bwalya, K.J., Mutshewa, A.: A probe into the factors for adoption and usage of electronic document and records management systems in the Botswana context. Inf. Dev. 33(1), 97–110 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buzzetto-More, N.: Understanding e-portfolios and their applications. The E-Portfolio paradigm: Informing, educating, assessing and Managing with E-Portfolios. Santa Rosa/CA, pp. 1–17 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amaya, P., et al.: Educational e-portfolios: uses and tools. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 93, 1169–1173 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yasin, R.M., Rahman, S., Ahmad, A.R.: Framework for reflective learning using portfolios in pre-service teacher training. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 3837–3841 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barrett, B.: Using e-portfolios to evaluate intellectual capital of online learners. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital: ISCTE (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cheal, C.: Implications of open source E-Portfolios. The E-Portfolio Paradigm: Informing, Educating, Assessing, and Managing with E-Portfolios, p. 35 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Altahawi, F., et al.: Student perspectives on assessment: experience in a competency-based portfolio system. Med. Teach. 34(3), 221–225 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cameron, R.: Recognising workplace learning: the emerging practices of e-RPL and e-PR. J. Workplace Learn. 24(2), 85–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fernández, L.M.S., Sanz, C.C., Pérez, M.A.N.: The presence of ICT in vocational guidance: a training proposal. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 44 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsom, H., et al.: E-PORTFOLIO development and implementation in Malaysian technical and vocational education training (TVET): a mixed methods analysis of Stakeholders’ and students’ perceptions. Int. J. Arts Sci. 8(1), 243 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turhan, M., Demirli, C.: The study on electronic portfolios in vocational education: the views of teachers and students in United Kingdom, Denmark, Romania and Turkey. Sci. Res. Essays 5(11), 1376–1383 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hawking, P., Sellitto, C.: Business intelligence (BI) critical success factors. In: 21st Australian Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ahmad, M.M., Cuenca, R.P.: Critical success factors for ERP implementation in SMEs. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 29(3), 104–111 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The DeLone–McLean information system success model for electronic records management system adoption in higher professional education institutions of Yemen. In: International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mukred, M., et al.: Taxonomic framework for factors influencing ERMS adoption in organisations of higher professional education. J. Inf. Sci. 45(2), 139–155 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mukred, M., et al.: A framework for electronic records management system adoption in the higher professional education: individual, technological and environmental factors. In: International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohammed Aldossari, A.M.Z.: The use of automation and robotic innovations in the transformational companies: systematic literature review J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 97(13), 3661–3690 (2019)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alsharari, J.: The perceived training needs of female head teachers compared with the training needs of male head teachers in the government public schools in Saudi Arabia, Durham University (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mukred, M., et al.: The key factors in adopting an electronic records management system (ERMS) in the educational sector: a UTAUT-based framework. IEEE Access 7, 35963–35980 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen, H., Chiang, R.H., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36, 1165–1188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Al-Jabri, I.M.: The perceptions of adopters and non-adopters of cloud computing: application of technology-organization-environment framework (2014)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alharbi, S.T.: Users’ acceptance of cloud computing in Saudi Arabia: an extension of technology acceptance model. Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. (IJCAC) 2(2), 1–11 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abdullah, F., Ward, R., Ahmed, E.: Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 75–90 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Al-Gahtani, S.S.: Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: a structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Inf. 12(1), 27–50 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Agudo-Peregrina, Á.F., Hernández-García, Á., Pascual-Miguel, F.J.: Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 301–314 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Faqih, K.M., Jaradat, M.-I.R.M.: Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 22, 37–52 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeed Matar Alshahrani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hazura Mohamed
    • 1
  • Muriati Mukhtar
    • 1
  • Umi Asma’ Mokhtar
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations