Advertisement

The Role of Cloud Electronic Records Management System (ERMS) Technology in the Competency of Educational Institutions

  • Muaadh MukredEmail author
  • Zawiyah M. Yusof
  • Nor Azian Binti Md. Noor
  • Bakare Kazeem Kayode
  • Ruqiah Al-Duais
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1073)

Abstract

Although the Electronic Records Management System (ERMS) is necessary for organizations to enhance their performance, many organizations are yet to embark on its implementation, while some others attempt at implementing it without model, thus leading to an ineffective and erroneous implementation. On the other side, researchers have already started applying cloud computing in ERMS implementations of education sector for its benefits. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a model for cloud ERMS implementation in an attempt to improve the Yemeni public sector educational institutions competency, using Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3). The study used the quantitative approach through questionnaire that was used as instrument to gather data from 350 respondents working in the education sector of Yemen. Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to predict the relationship between the constructs. The findings revealed that both dimensions of ERMS and Cloud are important in implementation of ERMS. The results also showed that ERMS has a significant relationship with the competency of the public sector educational institutions. This has arises implication whereby the public sector needs to pay attention to the factors found in the model in order to promote a successful implementation.

Keywords

Electronic Records Management System Competency Education Yemen Cloud computing TAM model Implementation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia by giving the authors an opportunity to conduct this research. This research is funded by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia under Research Grant Code: GUP-2017-046.

References

  1. 1.
    Laird, T.F.N., Kuh, G.D.: Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Res. High. Educ. 46(2), 211–233 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turney, C., et al.: Using technology to direct learning in higher education: the way forward? Active Learn. High. Educ. 10(1), 71–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The role of electronic records management (ERM) for supporting decision making process in Yemeni higher professional education (HPE): a preliminary review. Jurnal teknologi 73(2), 117–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Britland, M.: What is the future of technology in education. The Guardian 19 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benson, V., Morgan, S.: Student experience and ubiquitous learning in higher education: impact of wireless and cloud applications. Creative Educ. 4(8a), 1–5 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohammed, F., Ibrahim, O., Ithnin, N.: Factors influencing cloud computing adoption for e-government implementation in developing countries: instrument development. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 18(3), 297–327 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohammed, F., et al.: Cloud computing fitness for e-government implementation: importance-performance analysis. IEEE Access 6, 1236–1248 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Almazroi, A.A., Shen, H., Mohammed, F.: The impact of trust on the adoption of cloud computing services by university students. In: International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mukred, M., et al.: Taxonomic framework for factors influencing ERMS adoption in organisations of higher professional education. J. Inf. Sci. 45(2), 139–155 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mukred, M., et al.: The key factors in adopting an electronic records management system (ERMS) in the educational sector: a UTAUT-based framework. IEEE Access 7, 35963–35980 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adade, A., Quashigah, A.Y., Eshun, P.: Academic records management in Ghanaian basic schools: a study of basic schools in the Ashiedu Keteke sub-metro in the greater Accra region. Br. J. Educ. 6(4), 33–49 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmed, S.M., et al.: What are electronic information sharing and integration critical success factors that influence the participation in SMEs? J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 12(16), 4234–4240 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ross, L.E., et al.: Barriers and facilitators to primary care for people with mental health and/or substance use issues: a qualitative study. BMC Fam. Pract. 16(1), 135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adu, K.K., Ngulube, P.: Key threats and challenges to the preservation of digital records of public institutions in Ghana. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(8), 1127–1145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasanain, R., Vallmuur, K., Clark, M.: Implementation of electronic medical records in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 13(1), 5–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Wazir, A.A., Zheng, Z.: E-government development in Yemen: assessment and solutions. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 3(4), 512–518 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Mingo, A.C., Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A.: Improving records management to promote transparency and prevent corruption. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 38(1), 256–261 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: Electronic records management and its importance for decision making process in Yemeni higher professional education (HPE): a preliminary review. In: 1st International Conference of Recent Trends in Information and Communication Technologies (IRICT 2014), Johor Bahru, pp. 105–114 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: Factors influencing the adoption of electronic records management (ERM) for decision making process at higher professional education (HPE)’s institutions. In: 1st ICRIL-International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology (lICIST 2015), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 399–403 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mukred, M., et al.: Electronic records management system adoption readiness framework for higher professional education institutions in Yemen. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 6(6), 804–811 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adu, K.K.: Framework for digital preservation of electronic government in Ghana (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The DeLone–McLean information system success model for electronic records management system adoption in higher professional education institutions of Yemen. In: International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mukred, M., Yusof, Z.M.: The performance of educational institutions through the electronic records management systems: factors influencing electronic records management system adoption. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag. (IJITPM) 9(3), 34–51 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hase, S., Galt, J.: Records management myopia: a case study. Rec. Manag. J. 21(1), 36–45 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Samsudin, A., Miah, S., McGrath, G.: An ontology-based record management systems approach for enhancing decision support (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kroll, M.: Depicting the organisational strategy of an educational institution from an overall perspective. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 9(1), 8–12 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prion, S., et al.: Preceptor and self-evaluation competencies among new RN graduates. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 46(7), 303–308 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baron, J.R., Thurston, A., McLeod, J.: What lessons can be learned from the US archivist’s digital mandate for 2019 and is there potential for applying them in lower resource countries? Rec. Manag. J. 26(2), 206–217 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luchenski, S., et al.: Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: Study protocol. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 12(1), 40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Phiri, M.J.: Managing university records and documents in the world of governance, audit and risk: case studies from South Africa and Malawi. University of Glasgow (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewellen, M.J.: The impact of the perceived value of records on the use of electronic recordkeeping systems (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications, New York (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aziz, A.A., et al.: Establishing policy for the implementation of electronic document and records management system in public sector in Malaysia: the influencing factors. Adv. Sci. Lett. 23(11), 10732–10736 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salah, O.H., Yusof, Z.M., Mohamed, H.: A conceptual framework of CRM adoption among Palestinian SMEs. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 97(8), 2254–2267 (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barua, A., et al.: An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Q. 28(4), 585–620 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leon, A.: The respective roles of user participation and user involvement in information system implementation success (1991)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen, H., Chiang, R.H., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36, 1165–1188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Da Veiga, A., Martins, N., Eloff, J.H.: Information security culture-validation of an assessment instrument. South. Afr. Bus. Rev. 11(1), 147–166 (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li, H., Liu, Y., Suomi, R.: Measurement of e-service quality: an empirical study in online travel service (2009)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zissis, D., Lekkas, D.: Addressing cloud computing security issues. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(3), 583–592 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hair Jr., J.F., et al.: A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sullivan, G.M., Feinn, R.: Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 4(3), 279–282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muaadh Mukred
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zawiyah M. Yusof
    • 1
  • Nor Azian Binti Md. Noor
    • 2
  • Bakare Kazeem Kayode
    • 2
  • Ruqiah Al-Duais
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationAl-Madinah International UniversityKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations