Advertisement

Communication and Learning: Social Networking Platforms for Higher Education

  • Nani Amalina ZulkanainEmail author
  • Suraya Miskon
  • Norris Syed Abdullah
  • Nazmona Mat Ali
  • Norasnita Ahmad
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1073)

Abstract

This study explored the use of social networks specifically for general communication and learning in higher education. The types of social networks used by most students in higher education were identified before examining the difficulties faced by these students in handling social networks. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through survey distribution to several faculties. The results indicate the use of WhatsApp as the preferred application by students. In general, the major difficulties faced by these students in using social networks were misunderstanding and a lack of internet connection. Most suggestions for future social network features were for the design of an application which offers ease of use for general communication and learning purpose which has a high storage capacity, links to an educational portal and comes with a good internet connection service. In summary, WhatsApp is currently a priority for communication among these students and is, therefore, a preferred platform for the development of effective learning applications.

Keywords

Social networks Learning communities Higher education 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for the Research University Grant Scheme (GUP) (vote number: I6H76) that had supported this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Brooker, P., Barnett, J., Cribbin, T.: Doing social media analytics. Big Data Soc. 3, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burbules, N.C.: How we use and are used by social media in education. Educ. Theory 66, 551–565 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang, T., Cooper, R.: The most social games. Commun. Sport, 1–23 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516688438
  4. 4.
    Lu, W., Hampton, K.N.: Beyond the power of networks: differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media Soc. 19, 861–879 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mukherjee, D., Natrajan, N.S.: Comparative analysis of social media tool used in software projects deploying virtual teams. Vision 21, 397–409 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917733180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaidieh, A.J.Y.: The use of social networking in education: challenges and opportunities. World Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. J. 2, 18–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., Pagés, C.: An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Comput. Educ. 75, 82–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., Yeh, D.: What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput. Educ. 50, 1183–1202 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    So, S.: Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 31, 32–42 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H.M., Shaalan, K.: Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 93–102 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., Reber, S.: Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nassaji, H.: Qualitative and descriptive research: data type versus data analysis. Lang. Teach. Res. 19, 129–132 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stathopoulou, A., Siamagka, N., Christodoulides, G.: A multi-stakeholder view of social media as a supporting tool in higher education: an educator e student perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 37, 421–431 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poellhuber, B., Roy, N., Anderson, T.: Distance students’ readiness for social media and collaboration. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 12, 102–125 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranginwala, S., Towbin, A.J.: Use of social media in radiology education. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 15, 190–200 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neier, S., Zayer, L.T.: Students’ perceptions and experiences of social media in higher education. J. Mark. Educ. 37, 133–143 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315583748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sobaih, A.E.E., Moustafa, M.A., Ghandforoush, P.: To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Comput. Hum. Behav. 58, 296–305 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nani Amalina Zulkanain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suraya Miskon
    • 1
  • Norris Syed Abdullah
    • 1
  • Nazmona Mat Ali
    • 1
  • Norasnita Ahmad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ComputingUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations