Advertisement

Smart Group Decision Making on Leadership Style Identification Using Bayes Theorem

  • OkfalisaEmail author
  • Frica A. Ambarwati
  • Fitri Insani
  • Toto Saktioto
  • Angraini
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1073)

Abstract

The un-synergistic criteria’s of the candidate and the organization’s vision and mission became the main problem. The subjectivity of certain group tended to bring the frustration hence it provoked the emergence of conflict interests. In order to cover such issues, this paper proposed the blending of an expert system using Bayes theorem and Group Decision Making in identifying the candidate’s leadership style. The analysis was conducted in a series of activities through the development of knowledge base, inference engines, weighting, experts’ alliance, decision tree diagram, intersection independent and mean sample calculation. As a result, eleven numbers of leadership styles were theoretically identified thus confirmed and weighted by experts. In addition, the correlation between the leadership style and organizational vision and mission was analyzed. The leaders’ assessments were perceived by the candidate itself and supported team members. The calculation of estimated values proposed the percentage of candidate leadership style identification. This provided a smart group decision making in recommending organizational decision-makers towards the fit proper elected leader based on the situation. To automate the calculation, prototype assessment software was produced and tested. Black-box and User Acceptance Test found that this application was successfully applied in identifying the leadership style for future leaders.

Keywords

Bayes theorem Multiple perspectives Leader election Leader assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Monga, O.P.: Leadership theories and educational management: an insight. Biz Bytes: Bi-ann. Manag. Technol. 6, 46–55 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Val, C., Kemp, J.: Leadership styles. Pathways: Ontario J. Outdoor Educ. 24(3), 28–31 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karam, E.P., Hu, J., Davison, R.B., Juravich, M., Nahrgang, J.D., Humphrey, S.E., Scott DeRue, D.: Illuminating the ‘Face’ of justice: a meta-analytic examination of leadership and organizational justice. Manag. Stud. 56(1), 134–171 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L.: Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 16(3), 315–338 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Estrada, C.R., Carranza, M.T.G.: Leadership style in nonprofit organizations, the Mexican case. Int. J. Bus. Humanit. Technol. 6(4) (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arar, K., Abu Nasra, M.: Leadership style, occupational perception and organizational citizenship behavior in the Arab education system in Israel. Emerald Insight: Educ. Adm. 57(1), 85–100 (2019)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taiwo, A., Agwu, E., Lawal, F.: Vision and mission in the organization: myth or heuristic device? Int. J. Bus. Manag. 4(3), 127–134 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuseo, J.: Leadership self-assessment: assessing your leadership skills & leadership development (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, G., Lu, J.: An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decis. Negot. 12, 501–515 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reddy, S., Govindarajulu, P.: A Survey on data mining and machine learning techniques for internet voting and product/service Selection. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 17(9), 76–84 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okfalisa, Gazalba, I., Mustakim, M., Reza, N.G.I.: Comparative analysis of k-nearest neighbor and modified k-nearest neighbor algorithm for data classification. In: Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), Yogyakarta, pp. 294–298 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barbini, E., Manzi, P., Barbini, P.: Bayesian approach in medicine and health management. Intech (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amanchukwu, R.N., Stanley, G.J., Ololube, N.P.: A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management 5(1), 6–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zakeer, A., Allah, N., Irfanullah, K.: Leadership theories and styles: a literature review. J. Res. Dev. Manag. 16, 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lorraine, D.C, Jealarr, J, Luis, L.M.L, Charmaine, A.M, Ria, A.S.: J. Adv. Comput. Netw. 2(3) (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hummel, R.A., Landy, M.S.: A statistical viewpoint on the theory of evidence. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 10(2), 235–247 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ordoobadi, S.M., Wang, S.: A multiple perspectives approach to supplier selection. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 111(4), 629–648 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Okfalisa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frica A. Ambarwati
    • 1
  • Fitri Insani
    • 1
  • Toto Saktioto
    • 2
  • Angraini
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Informatics EngineeringUIN Sultan Syarif Kasim RiauPekanbaruIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversitas RiauPekanbaruIndonesia
  3. 3.Department of Information SystemUIN Sultan Syarif Kasim RiauPekanbaruIndonesia
  4. 4.School of Computing, Faculty EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaSkudaiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations