Detection of Cirrhosis Through Ultrasound Imaging

  • Karan AggarwalEmail author
  • Manjit Singh Bhamrah
  • Hardeep Singh Ryait
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1073)


Cirrhosis is a liver disease that is considered to be among the most common diseases in healthcare. Due to its non-invasive nature, Ultrasound (US) imaging is a widely accepted technology for the diagnosis of this disease. This research work proposed a method for discriminating the cirrhotic liver from normal liver through US images. The liver US images were obtained from the radiologist. The radiologist also specified the Region of Interest (ROI) from these images and then the proposed method was applied on it. Two parameters were extracted from the US images through differences in intensity of neighboring pixels. Then these parameters can be used to train a classifier by which cirrhotic region of test patient can be detected. A 2-D array was created by difference in intensity of the neighboring pixels. From this array, two parameters were calculated. The decision was taken by checking these parameters. The validation of the proposed tool was done on 80 images of cirrhotic and 30 images of normal liver and classification accuracy of 98.18% was achieved. The result was also verified by the radiologist. The results verified its possibility and applicability for high performance cirrhotic liver discrimination.


Cirrhotic liver Ultrasound image Intensity difference Support vector machine Region of interest 


  1. 1.
    Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N.: Prediction of cirrhosis based on singular value decomposition of gray level co-occurence matrix and a neural network classifier. In: Proceeding IEEE Conference Developments in E-systems Engineering, pp. 146–151 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal, K., Bhamrah, M.S., Ryait, H.S.: The identification of liver cirrhosis with modified LBP grayscaling and Otsu binarization. SpringerPlus 5, 1–15 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Masson, S.A., Nakib, A.: Real-time assessment of bone structure positions via ultrasound imaging. J. Real Time Image Process. 13, 135–145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strauss, S., Gavish, E., Gottlieb, P.: Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of fatty liver. Am. J. Roentgenol. 189, W320-3 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doi, K.: Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. Br. J. Radiol. 78, s3–s19 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fujita, H., Uchiyama, Y., Nakagawa, T.: Computer-aided diagnosis: the emerging of three CAD systems induced by Japanese health care needs. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 92, 238–248 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashem, A.M., Rasmy, M.E., Wahba, K.M.: Single stage and multistage classification models for the prediction of liver fibrosis degree in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 105, 194–209 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polat, K., Günes, S.: A hybrid approach to medical decision support systems: combining feature selection, fuzzy weighted pre-processing and AIRS. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 88, 164–174 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sartakhti, J.S., Zangooei, M.H., Mozafari, K.: Hepatitis disease diagnosis using a novel hybrid method based on support vector machine and simulated annealing (SVM-SA). Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 108, 570–579 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, Y., Ma, L., Liu, P.: Feature selection and syndrome prediction for liver cirrhosis in traditional Chinese medicine. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 95, 249–257 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams, L.A., Angulo, P., Lindor, K.D.: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cana Med Assoc J. 172, 899–905 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hawlick, R.M.: Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 786–808 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abramov, N., Fradkin, M., Rouet, L.: Configurable real-time motion estimation for medical imaging: application to X-ray and ultrasound. J. Real Time Image Process. 13, 147–160 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castellano, G., Bonilha, L., Li, L.M.: Texture analysis of medical images. Clin. Radiol. 59, 1061–1069 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Filipczuk, P., Fevens, T., Krzyżak, A.: Computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis based on the analysis of cytological images of fine needle biopsies. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32, 2169–2178 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chaieb, F., Said, T.B., Mabrouk, S.: Accelerated liver tumor segmentation in four-phase computed tomography images. J. Real Time Image Process. 13, 121–133 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Grangier, D., Bengio, S.: A discriminative kernel-based approach to rank images from text queries. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 1371–1384 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gulo, C.A.S.J., De Arruda, H.F., De Araujo, A.F.: Efficient parallelization on GPU of an image smoothing method based on a variational model. J. Real Time Image Process. 16, 1–13 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yeh, W.C., Jeng, Y.M., Li, C.H.: Liver steatosis classification using high-frequency ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31, 599–605 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kadah, Y.M., Farag, A.A., Zurada, J.M.: Classification algorithms for quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse liver disease from ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15, 466–478 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graif, M., Yanuka, M., Baraz, M.: Quantitative estimation of attenuation in ultrasound video images: correlation with histology in diffuse liver disease. Invest. Radiol. 35, 319–324 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ribeiro, R., Sanches, J.: Fatty liver characterization and classification by ultrasound. In: Pattern Recognition Image Analysis. LNCS, vol. 5524, 354–361 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu, C.C., Lee, W.L., Chen, Y.C.: Evolution-based hierarchical feature fusion for ultrasonic liver tissue characterization. IEEE J. Bio. Health Inf. 17, 967–976 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu, C.C., Lee, W.L., Chen, Y.C.: Ultrasonic liver tissue characterization by feature fusion. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9389–9397 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murala, S., Jonathan, Q.M.: Local mesh patterns versus local binary patterns: biomedical image indexing and retrieval. IEEE J. Bio. Health Inf. 18, 929–938 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lucieer, A., Stein, A., Fisher, P.: Multivariate texture-based segmentation of remotely sensed imagery for extraction of objects and their uncertainty. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 2917–2936 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Virmani, J., Kumar, V., Kalra, N.: SVM-based characterization of liver ultrasound images using wavelet packet texture descriptors. J. Digit. Imaging 26, 530–543 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chaou, A.K., Mekhaldi, A., Teguar, M.: Elaboration of novel image processing algorithm for arcing discharges recognition on HV polluted insulator model. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 22, 990–999 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heikkila, M., Pietikainen, M.: A texture-based method for modeling the background and detecting moving objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 657–662 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9, 62–66 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kyriacou, E., Pavlopoulos, S., Konnis, G.: Computer assisted characterization of diffused liver disease using image texture analysis techniques on B-scan images. In: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 1479–1483 (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pavlopoulos, S., Kyriacou, E., Koutsouris, D.: Fuzzy neural network-based texture analysis of ultrasonic images. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 19, 39–47 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Badawi, A.M., Derbala, A.S., Youssef, A.M.: Fuzzy logic algorithm for quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse liver diseases from ultrasound images. Int. J. Med. Inform. 55, 135–147 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jiuqing, W., Sirui, Z.: Features extraction based on wavelet packet transform for B-mode ultrasound liver images. In: 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 949–955 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee, W.L., Chen, Y.C., Hsieh, K.S.: Ultrasonic liver tissues classification by fractal feature vector based on m-band wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 382–392 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Acharya, U.R., Sree, S.V., Ribeiro, R.: Data mining framework for fatty liver disease classification in ultrasound: a hybrid feature extraction paradigm. Med. Phys. 39, 4255–4264 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karan Aggarwal
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Manjit Singh Bhamrah
    • 2
  • Hardeep Singh Ryait
    • 3
  1. 1.Electronics & Communication Engineering DepartmentM.M. Deemed to be UniversityMullanaIndia
  2. 2.Electronics & Communication Engineering DepartmentPunjabi UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electronics & Communication EngineeringBBSBECFatehgarh SahibIndia

Personalised recommendations