Advertisement

A Comparative Review on the Agile Tenets in the IT Service Management and the Software Engineering Domains

  • Manuel MoraEmail author
  • Fen Wang
  • Jorge Marx Gómez
  • Oswaldo Díaz
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1071)

Abstract

A rigor-oriented paradigm, in the Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) domain, has permeated in multiple international organizations. In contrast, in the Software Engineering (SwE) domain, the agile paradigm has complemented or replaced the rigor-oriented one in the last two decades. Recently shortened ITSM methods (i.e. FitSM and IT4IT) have emerged. However, due to their novelty, there is a scarce analysis of literature on their main assumed agile tenets. In this study, we identified and compared such tenets (i.e. aims, values, and principles) of the agile SwE and ITSM paradigms as well as the adherence to them from a representative literature on agile SwE and ITSM methods. Our results identified a high and low adherence respectively in the SwE and ITSM methods. Thus, a call for a robust theoretical foundation on agile tenets like those found in the SwE methods is required for the ITSM methods.

Keywords

Agile paradigm tenets Agile ITSM methods Agile software engineering methods FitSM IT4IT Representative literature analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Hunnebeck, L., et al.: ITIL Service Design. The Stationary Office (TSO), London (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iden, J., Eikebrokk, T.R.: Implementing IT service management: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(3), 512–523 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marrone, M., Gacenga, F., Cater-Steel, A., Kolbe, L.: IT service management: a cross-national study of ITIL adoption. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 865–892 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eikebrokk, T.R., Iden, J.: Strategising IT service management through ITIL implementation: model and empirical test. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. 28(3–4), 238–265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Zewairi, M., Biltawi, M., Etaiwi, W., Shaout, A.: Agile software development methodologies: survey of surveys. J. Comput. Commun. 5(5), 74–97 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuang, S.W., Luor, T., Lu, H.P.: Assessment of institutions, scholars, and contributions on agile software development (2001–2012). J. Syst. Softw. 93, 84–101 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer 35(1), 64–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    FitSM - a free standard for lightweight ITSM. https://fitsm.itemo.org
  9. 9.
    The Open Group IT4IT™ Reference Architecture, Version 2.1. http://pubs.opengroup.org/it4it/refarch21
  10. 10.
    Smith, A.W., Rahman, N.: Can agile, lean and ITIL coexist? IJKBO 7(1), 78–88 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q., xiii–xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teddlie, C., Yu, F.: Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J. Mix. Methods. Res. 1(1), 77–100 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galvan, S.: Design and Validation of a Project Management Deployment Package for Agile Systems Development Methodologies Based on the ISO/IEC 29110 Standard (Entry Profile). PhD Dissertation, UJAT (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Verlaine, B.: Toward an agile IT service management framework. Serv. Sci. 9(4), 263–274 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beck, K.: Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer 32(10), 70–77 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindstrom, L., Jeffries, R.: Extreme programming and agile software development methodologies. Inf. Syst. Manag. 21(3), 41–52 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramesh, B., Abrahamsson, P., Cockburn, A., Lyytinen, K., Williams, L.: Agile software development methods: when and why do they work? In: IFIP International Working Conference on Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion, pp. 371–373. Springer, London (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abrahamsson, P., Still, J.: Agile software development: theoretical and practical outlook. In: 8th International conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 410–411. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Begel, A., Nagappan, N.: Usage and perceptions of agile software development in an industrial context: an exploratory study. In: First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 255—264. IEEE Press, Los Alamos (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hanssen, G.K., Šmite, D., Moe, N.B.: Signs of agile trends in global software engineering research: A tertiary study. In: Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshop, pp. 17–23. IEEE Press, Los Alamos (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao, K.N., Naidu, G.K., Chakka, P.: A study of the Agile software development methods, applicability and implications in industry. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 5(2), 35–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hong, W., Thong, J.Y., Chasalow, L.C., Dhillon, G.: User acceptance of agile information systems: a model and empirical test. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 28(1), 235–272 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., Moe, N.: A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 1213–1221 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anand, R.V., Dinakaran, M.: Popular agile methods in software development: review and analysis. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11(5), 3433–3437 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoda, R., Salleh, N., Grundy, J.: The rise and evolution of agile software development. IEEE Softw. 35(5), 58–63 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tripp, J.F., Armstrong, D.J.: Agile methodologies: organizational adoption motives, tailoring, and performance. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 58(2), 170–179 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoover, C.: ITIL vs. agile programming: is the agile programming discipline compatible with the itil framework? In: International CMG Conference, pp. 613–620. Computer Measurement Group (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Radecki, M., Szymocha, T., Szepieniec, T., Różańska, R.: Improving PL-Grid operations based on fitsm standard. In: Bubak, M., Kitowski, J., Wiatr, K. (eds.) eScience on Distributed Computing Infrastructure, pp. 94–105. Springer, London (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Komarek, A., Sobeslav, V., Pavlik, J.: Enterprise ICT transformation to agile environment. In: Computational Collective Intelligence, pp. 326–335. Springer, London, 2015Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Melendez, K., Dávila, A., Pessoa, M.: Information technology service management models applied to medium and small organizations: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 47, 120–127 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    IT4IT™ Agile Scenario Using the Reference Architecture. https://publications.opengroup.org/w162
  35. 35.
    Campbell, A., Fulton, M.: Defining the IT Operating Model. The Open Group, Berkshire (2017)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Michael, S., Michael, B., Thomas, S.: IT service management frameworks compared–simplifying service portfolio management. In: 2019 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, pp. 421–427. IEEE Press, Los Alamos (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Mora
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fen Wang
    • 2
  • Jorge Marx Gómez
    • 3
  • Oswaldo Díaz
    • 4
  1. 1.Autonomous University of Aguascalientes, Information SystemsAguascalientesMexico
  2. 2.Central Washington University, Technology and Administrative ManagementEllensburgUSA
  3. 3.University of Oldenburg, InformaticsOldenburgGermany
  4. 4.INEGI, Data Center CentralAguascalientesMexico

Personalised recommendations