Advertisement

Movements, Memory, and Mixture: Aristotle, Confusion, and the Historicity of Memory

  • John SuttonEmail author
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 22)

Abstract

Aristotle frequently discusses specific material constraints on memory and recollection. This essay reinterprets his fluid physiological psychology of memory, which depends on the stability of bodily movements or traces, in light of his general theory of mixture. It proposes new ways to link memory and metaphysics in the Aristotelian tradition; counters a popular historical narrative which sets Aristotle at the origin of a static Western ‘archival model’ of memory; and suggests the relevance for contemporary philosophy and science of Aristotle’s view of the potential existence of movements in memory.

Notes

Acknowledgements

My sincere thanks to the editors of this volume, and to the organisers of the outstanding 2016 conference at Goteborg, from which I learned a lot. Seyed Mousavian’s questions in particular have helped me improve the final version. The ideas developed in this essay were first investigated in 1993, when I presented talks on confusion and mixture to audiences in philosophy and ancient history at Macquarie University and the University of Sydney. I returned to the topic during a visiting fellowship at the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities at the University of Edinburgh in 1999, for which I am very grateful, and presented a talk in the Edinburgh Department of Philosophy. Among those who influenced, helped, or challenged me on those earlier versions of this material I remember and thank in particular Rick Benitez, Deborah Brown, Paolo Crivelli, Stephen Gaukroger, Richard Holton, Rae Langton, Catriona Mackenzie, Doris McIlwain, Dory Scaltsas, Godfrey Tanner, and Harold Tarrant. My colleagues in the McGill-based Early Modern Conversions project, especially Ben Schmidt, Mark Vessey, Bronwen Wilson, and Paul Yachnin encouraged me to return to these topics. For more recent assistance I am grateful to Graeme Friedman and to Christine Harris-Smyth. The penultimate version of the essay was written in 2017 while I was a Collaborative Visiting Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy in the School of Advanced Study at the University of London: I am very grateful to Ophelia Deroy, Barry Smith, Richard Somerville, and all those at the Institute for making my stay so enjoyable.

References

  1. Annas, J. (1986). Aristotle on memory and the self. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 99–117.Google Scholar
  2. Beare, J. I. (1906). Greek theories of elementary cognition from Alcmaeon to Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beecher, D., & Williams, G. (Eds.). (2009). Ars Reminiscendi: Mind and memory in Renaissance culture. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, D. (2007). Aristotle on memory and recollection. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogen, J. (1996). Fire in the belly: Aristotelian elements, organisms, and chemical compounds. In F. A. Lewis & R. Bolton (Eds.), Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle (pp. 183–216). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the archive: Remapping memory. Culture & Psychology, 16, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockmeier, J. (2015). Beyond the archive: Memory, narrative, and the autobiographical process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brockmeier, J. (2017). From memory as archive to remembering as conversation. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Handbook of culture and memory (pp. 41–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chappell, S.-G. (2017). Aristotle. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 396–407). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. M. (1988). Metaphysics in Aristotle’s embryology. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 214, 14–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, J. M. (2004). Two notes on Aristotle on mixture. In Cooper, knowledge, nature, and the good: Essays on ancient philosophy (pp. 148–173). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, K. (2001, August 15). Whither the golden oldies of ESHHS: The historiography of psychological objects. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Danziger, K. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Brigard, F. (2014). Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, 191, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Haas, F. A. (1999). Mixture in Philoponus: An encounter with a third kind of potentiality. In The commentary tradition on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione: ancient, medieval and early modern (pp. 21–46). Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar
  16. Elman, J. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fine, K. (1996). The problem of mixture. In F. A. Lewis & R. Bolton (Eds.), Form, matter, and mixture in Aristotle (pp. 82–182). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, K. (1999). Mixing matters. In D. S. Oderberg (Ed.), Form and matter: Themes in contemporary metaphysics (pp. 65–75). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Frede, D. (2004). On generation and corruption I.10: On mixture and mixables. In F. de Haas & J. Mansfeld (Eds.), Aristotle: On generation and corruption, Book I (pp. 289–314). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Freudenthal, G. (1995). Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: heat and pneuma, form and soul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Furth, M. (1988). Substance, form, and psyche: An Aristotelian metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hampshire, S. (1989). Innocence and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. I, pp. 77–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hooke, R. (1682/1705/1971). Lectures of Light. In The Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke (ed. R. Waller (London, 170S); reprinted with an introduction by T. M. Brown). London: Frank Cass and Co., 1971.Google Scholar
  26. Hutchins, B. R., Eriksen, C. B., & Wolfe, C. T. (2016). The embodied Descartes: Contemporary readings of L’Homme. In D. Antoine-Mahut & S. Gaukroger (Eds.), Descartes’ Treatise on Man and its reception (pp. 287–304). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joachim, H. H. (1904). Aristotle’s conception of chemical combination. Journal of Philology, 29, 72–86.Google Scholar
  28. Joachim, H. H. (1922). Aristotle on coming-to-be and passing-away: A revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, R. (2009). Hooke’s two buckets: Memory, mnemotechnique and knowledge in the early Royal Society. In D. Beecher & G. Williams (Eds.), Ars Reminiscendi: Mind and memory in Renaissance culture (pp. 339–363). Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. (1987). The Hellenistic philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malebranche, N. (1674/1980). The search after truth (T. M. Lennon & P. J. Olscamp, Trans.). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mansfeld, J. (1983). Zeno and Aristotle on mixture. Mnemosyne, 36, 306–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, C. B., & Deutscher, M. (1966). Remembering. Philosophical Review, 75, 161–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michaelian, K. (2016). Mental time travel: Episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niebyl, P. H. (1971). The non-naturals. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 45, 486–492.Google Scholar
  37. O’Brien, G. J. (1991). Is connectionism commonsense? Philosophical Psychology, 4, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, J. (1992). Aristotle’s abduction: The institution of frontiers. Oxford Literary Review, 14, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramsey, W., Stich, S. P., & Garon, J. (1990). Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives, 4: Action theory and philosophy of mind (pp. 499–533). Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  40. Rather, L. J. (1968). The ‘six things non-natural’: A note on the origins and fate of a doctrine and a phrase. Clio Medica, 3, 337–347.Google Scholar
  41. Robins, S. (2016). Representing the past: Memory traces and the causal theory of memory. Philosophical Studies, 173, 2993–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossi, P. (2000). Logic and the art of memory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  43. Schmidgen, W. (2012). Exquisite mixture: The virtues of impurity in early modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharvy, R. (1983). Aristotle on mixtures. Journal of Philosophy, 80, 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sisko, J. E. (1996). Material alteration and cognitive activity in Aristotle’s De Anima. Phronesis, 41, 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, R. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 55–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, C. U. M., Frixione, E., Finger, S., & Clower, W. (2012). The animal spirit doctrine and the origins of neurophysiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sorabji, R. (1972/2004). Aristotle on Memory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  49. Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, space, and motion: Theories in antiquity and their sequel. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  50. Sorabji, R. (1991). From Aristotle to Brentano: The development of the doncept of intentionality. In H. Blumenthal & H. Robinson (Eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, supplementary volume, 227–259.Google Scholar
  51. Stafford, B. M. (1991). Body criticism: Imagining the unseen in enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stevenson, C. (2005). Robert Hooke, monuments, and memory. Art History, 28, 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sutton, J. (1998). Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sutton, J. (2000a). Body, mind, and order: Local memory and the control of mental representations in medieval and renaissance sciences of self. In G. Freeland & A. Corones (Eds.), 1543 and all that: Word and image in the proto-scientific revolution (pp. 117–150). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sutton, J. (2000b). The body and the brain. In S. Gaukroger, J. Schuster, & J. Sutton (Eds.), Descartes’ natural philosophy (pp. 697–722). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Sutton, J. (2007). Language, memory, and concepts of memory: Semantic diversity and scientific psychology. In M. Amberber (Ed.), The language of memory from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 41–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Temkin, O. (1973). Galenism: Rise and decline of a medical philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Todd, R. B. (1976). Alexander of Aphrodisias on stoic physics: A study of the De Mixtione. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tracy, T. J. (1969). Physiological theory and the doctrine of the mean in Plato and Aristotle. Chicago: Loyola University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van der Eijck, P. J. (1997). The matter of mind: Aristotle on the biology of ‘psychic’ processes and the bodily aspects of thinking. In W. Kullmann & S. Föllinger (Eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (pp. 231–258). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  62. Wear, A. (1995). Medicine in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700. In L. I. Conrad, M. Neve, V. Nutton, R. Porter, & A. Wear (Eds.), The Western Medical Tradition (pp. 215–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Webb, P. (1982). Bodily structure and psychic faculties in Aristotle’s theory of perception. Hermes, 110, 25–20.Google Scholar
  64. Weisberg, M., & Wood, R. (2003). Richard Rufus’s theory of mixture. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 988, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wierbicka, A. (2007). Is ‘remember’ a universal human concept? ‘Memory’ and culture. In M. Amberber (Ed.), The language of memory from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 13–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood, R., & Weisberg, M. (2004). Interpreting Aristotle on mixture: Problems about elemental composition from Philoponus to Cooper. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations