Advertisement

On Librarianship and/with Digital Scholarly Practice

  • Vika ZafrinEmail author
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter argues that the new knowledge created by digital scholarly work needs to be recognized as collaboratively produced. Resulting from the expertise of both library professionals and academic scholars, work in the digital humanities is uniquely positioned at the intersection of different intellectual fields. Treating the economic and political issues that arise with the institutionalization of digital scholarship, Zafrin makes a case for greater recognition of the labor performed by librarians.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Jane. 2009. (Colonial) Archives and (Copyright) Law. Nomorepotlucks 1 (4). nomorepotlucks.org/site/colonial-archives-and-copyright-law/. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  2. ———. 2005. Access and Control of Indigenous Knowledge in Libraries and Archives: Ownership and Future Use. In Correcting Course: Rebalancing Copyright for Libraries in the National and International Arena, ed. American Library Association and The MacArthur Foundation. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  3. Anne, Kirk M., et al. 2017. Building Capacity for Digital Humanities: A Framework for Institutional Planning. ECAR Working Group Paper, May 31. Louisville: ECAR.Google Scholar
  4. Bourg, Chris. 2015. Never Neutral: Libraries, Technology, and Inclusion. Feral Librarian. chrisbourg.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/never-neutral-libraries-technology-and-inclusion/. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  5. Brennan, Timothy. 2017. The Digital-Humanities Bust. The Chronicle Review, October 15. www.chronicle.com/article/The-Digital-Humanities-Bust/241424. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  6. Buckland, Hannah. 2017. Decolonizing Catalogs in Tribal College Libraries. ALCTS Exchange: Embracing the Past, Building the Future. youtu.be/sUmS2dmngE0
  7. Christen, Kimberly. 2012. Does Information Really Want to Be Free?: Indigenous Knowledge and the Politics of Open Access. The International Journal of Communication 6: 2870–2893.Google Scholar
  8. Hayden, Carla. 2018. Accessing a Diverse Collection by a Diverse Library Audience with Dr. Carla Hayden. Information Matters Lecture at the Smithsonian Libraries, July 19. library.si.edu/webcasts/accessing-diverse-collection-dr-carla-hayden. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  9. Local Contexts. Traditional Knowledge Labels. localcontexts.org/tk-labels. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  10. Mckesson, DeRay. 2017. We Don’t Know How This Movie Ends. Pod Save the People, September 5. https://crooked.com/podcast/we-dont-know-how-this-movie-ends/. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  11. Schmidt, Benjamin. 2018. The Humanities Are in Crisis. The Atlantic, August 23. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/08/the-humanities-face-a-crisisof-confidence/567565/. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  12. Smith, Martha Nell. 2011. The Humanities Are Not a Luxury: A Manifesto for the Twenty-First Century. Liberal Education 97 (1): 48–55.Google Scholar
  13. Terras, Melissa, Ernesto Priego, Alan Liu, Geoffrey Rockwell, Stéfan Sinclair, Christine Henseler, and Lindsay Thomas. 2013. The Humanities Matter! Infographic. 4humanities.org/infographic. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  14. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Humanities Indicators. www.humanitiesindicators.org. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  15. Zafrin, Vika. 2007. RolandHT. PhD Dissertation, Brown University. http://rolandht.org/. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.
  16. Zafrin, Vika, and Massimo Riva. 2008. Presentazione del Virtual Humanities Lab alla Brown University. Storicamente 4 (38).  https://doi.org/10.1473/stor302. Accessed 26 Dec 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations