Advertisement

Conclusion and the Way Forward

  • Vijay Kumar ShrotryiaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human Well-Being Research and Policy Making book series (HWBRPM)

Abstract

This final chapter summarizes the book providing key takeaways. In addition to the key takeaways, a purposeful argument for public policy based on the priority of human well-being over conventional GDP has been built utilizing the experiences of the world, since the inception of GDP. The HWB developments in the field of academics as well as need for HWB-focused policy shift has been narrated in brief. Policies focusing on building superior education systems and sustainable health systems are strongly suggested. As South Asia falls under the “developing” category, heavy migration from rural to urban areas is evident. In that context, a vision for building happy cities is required which has been briefed in the following chapter. The use of technology specially for improving governance has been highlighted and discussion around technological policies has been incorporated wherever considered appropriate. This chapter concludes with an analysis of comparative strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats emphasized for guiding future policy direction.

Keywords

Human well-being South Asia GDP Technology Happy cities Governance Education Health 

References

  1. Abdul Kalam, A. P. J. (2012). Turning points—A journey through challenges. New Delhi: Harper Collins Publishers India.Google Scholar
  2. Bhattarai, K. (2011). Trade, growth and poverty in South Asia. In R. Jha (Ed.), Routledge handbook of South Asian economics (pp. 258–276). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness—What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bose, S., & Jalal, A. (2004). Modern South Asia—History, culture, political economy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Carus, P. (1995). The gospel of Buddha. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company. Accessed from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/buddha-the-gospel-of-buddha.
  7. Cobb, C., Gary, S., Goodman, & Mathis, W. (1999). Why bigger isn’t better: The genuine progress indicator—1999. Update. Redefining Progress (November). Accessed from http://www.nber.org/rosenbla/econ302/lecture/GPIGDP/gpi1999.pdf.
  8. Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., & Talbert, J. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress. The Pardee Papers No. 4, January 2009. The Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future. Boston University. Accessed form http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=iss_pub.
  9. Coyle, D. (2014). GDPA brief but affectionate history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deaton, A. (2017). Without governments, would countries have more inequality, or less? The Economist. Accessed from https://www.economist.com/news/world-if/21724910-angus-deaton-nobel-prizewinning-economist-explores-question-intrigued-him-without on September 29, 2017.
  11. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2004). Beyond money, towards an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  12. Easterbrook, G. (2003). The progress paradox how life gets better while people feel worse. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–48.Google Scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.Google Scholar
  16. Estes, R. J., & Zhou, H. (2014). A conceptual approach to the creation of public–private partnerships in social welfare. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(4).  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12142.Google Scholar
  17. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.Google Scholar
  18. Goossens, Y., Makipaa, A., Philipp, S., & van de Sand, I. (2007). Alternative progress indicators to gross domestic product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. Policy Department, Economic and Scientific Policy. European Parliament. Accessed from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2007/385672/IPOL-ENVI_ET(2007)385672_EN.pdf.
  19. Helliwell, J. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variations to explain subjective wellbeing. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360. Accessed from http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/jhelliwell/papers/Helliwell-EM2003.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. ILO. (2018). World employment social outlookTrends 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, T. (2006). Beyond the well-being paradox: Well-being, consumption growth, and sustainability. CES working paper 06/06. Guildford (Surrey) UK: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey. Accessed from https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ces/files/pdf/0606_WP_Wellbeing_and_SD.pdf.
  22. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity with growth—Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Happiness income satiation and turning points around the world. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(33–38). Accessed from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0277-0.
  24. Kinga, S. (2009). Kingship and democracy—A biography of the Bhutanese state. Thimphu: Ministry of Education, Royal Government of Bhutan.Google Scholar
  25. Krieger, T., & Meierrieks, D. (2016). Political capitalism: The interaction between income inequality, economic freedom and democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 115–132.Google Scholar
  26. Kuznets, S. (1934). National income, 1929–32, 1934. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2258.pdf.
  27. Layard, R. (2006). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy 1820–1992. Paris: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
  29. Mathur, K. (2013). Public policy and politics in India—How institutions matter. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. MaxNeef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 115–118.Google Scholar
  31. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  32. Nepali, R. K. (2009). Democracy in South Asia. Stockholm, Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
  33. Noah, T. (2012). The great divergence: America’s growing inequality crisis and what we can do about it. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nordhaus, W., & Tobin, J. (1973). Is growth absolute. In M. Moss (Ed.), The measurement of economic and social performance (pp. 509–564). NBER. Accessed from https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/nbrnberch/3621.htm.
  35. Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note, February 2014. Accessed from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf.
  36. Oxfam. (2014). Working for the few: Political capture and economic inequality. Oxford Briefing Paper 178. Accessed from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bp-working-for-few-politicalcapture-economic-inequality-200114-summ-en.pdf on October 20, 2017.
  37. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Planning Commission. (2000). Bhutan national human development report 2000—Gross national happiness and human development: Searching for common ground. Thimphu: Planning Commission Secretariat, Royal Government of Bhutan. Accessed from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/bhutan_2000_en.pdf on January 10, 2016.
  39. Posner, S., & Costanza, R. (2011). A summary of ISEW and GPI studies at multiple score and new estimates for Baltimore City, Baltimore Country and the state of Maryland. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1972–1980.Google Scholar
  40. Sen, A. (1976). Real national income. Review of Economic Studies, 43(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. (1979). The welfare basis of real income comparisons. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(1), 1–45.Google Scholar
  42. Sgroi, D., Hills, T., O’Donnell, G., Oswald, A., & Proto, E. (2017). In K. Brandon (Ed.), Understanding happiness—A CAGE policy report. London: Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy, Social Market Foundation. Accessed from https://www.andrewoswald.com/docs/HappinessReport2017V1.pdf.
  43. Shrotryia, V. K. (2017). The history of well-being in South Asia. In R. J. Estes & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), The pursuit of human well-being—The untold global history (pp. 349–380). International Handbooks on Quality of Life. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, A. (1984). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives, why GDP does not add up. New Delhi: Book well Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Talbot, I. (1998). Pakistan—A modern history. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
  47. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2007). Abolishing GDP. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2007-019/3. Accessed from https://papers.tinbergen.nl/07019.pdf.
  48. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.12.001.Google Scholar
  49. Von, T. A. (2007). Indian summer: The secret history of the end of an empire. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  50. Weitzman, M. (1976). On the welfare significance of the national product in a dynamic economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 156–162.Google Scholar
  51. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  52. World Bank. (2008). The growth report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development, World Bank.Google Scholar
  53. World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommerceUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations