Advertisement

Tracing Identity Exploration Trajectories with Quantitative Ethnographic Techniques: A Case Study

  • Aroutis FosterEmail author
  • Mamta Shah
  • Amanda Barany
  • Hamideh Talafian
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1112)

Abstract

This paper is situated in a 5-year NSF CAREER project awarded to test and refine Projective Reflection (PR) as a theoretical and methodological framework for facilitating learning as identity exploration in play-based environments. 54 high school students engaged in Virtual City Planning, an iteratively refined course that provided systematic and personally-relevant opportunities for play, curricular, reflection and discussion activities in Philadelphia Land Science, a virtual learning environment, and in an associated curriculum enacted in a STEM museum-classroom. In-game logged data and in-class student data were examined using Epistemic Network Analysis. An illustrative case study revealed visual and interpretive patterns in students’ identity exploration. The change was reflected in their knowledge, interest and valuing, self-organization and self-control, and self-perception and self-definition (KIVSSSS) in relation to the roles explored from the start of the intervention (Starting Self), during (Exploring role-specific Possible Selves), and the end (New Self).

Keywords

Identity exploration Epistemic Network Analysis Case study Projective Reflection Virtual learning environments Game-based learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Foster, A.: CAREER: Projective reflection: Learning as identity exploration within games for science. National Science Foundation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ. 46(3), 223–234 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster, A., Shah, M.: Knew me and new me: facilitating student identity exploration and learning through game integration. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediated Simul. 8(3), 39–58 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah, M., Foster, A., Barany, A.: Facilitating learning as identity change through game-based learning. In: Baek, Y. (ed.) Game-Based Learning: Theory, Strategies and Performance Outcomes. Nova Publishers, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas, D., Brown, J.S.: A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change. CreateSpace, Lexington (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E., Killingsworth, S.S.: Digital games, design, and learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 86(1), 79–122 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster, A.: Assessing learning games for school content: the TPACK-PCaRD framework and methodology. In: Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X. (eds.) Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wise, A.F., Shaffer, D.W.: Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. J. Learn. Anal. 2(2), 5–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Terry, L.: What knowledge is of most worth: teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. J. Digital Learn. Teach. Educ. 29(4), 127–140 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S.: Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 68–81 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1986). (1934)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan, A., Sinai, M., Flum, H.: Design-based interventions for promoting students’ identity exploration within the school curriculum. In: Karabenick, S.A., Urdan, T.C. Motivational Interventions: Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 18, pp. 243–291. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foster, A.: Games and motivation to learn science: personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 19(4), 597–614 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hidi, S., Renninger, K.A.: The four-phase model of interest development. Educ. Psychol. 41(2), 111–127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hadwin, A., Oshige, M.: Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teach. Coll. Rec. 113(2), 240–264 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81(3), 329–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foster, A., Shah, M.: The play curricular activity reflection and discussion model for game-based learning. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 47(2), 71–88 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L.: Design experiments in educational research. Educ. Res. 32(1), 9–13 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stake, R.E.: The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Elsevier Inc.PhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations