Advertisement

Examining the Impact of Virtual City Planning on High School Students’ Identity Exploration

  • Mamta Shah
  • Aroutis FosterEmail author
  • Hamideh Talafian
  • Amanda Barany
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1112)

Abstract

This paper is situated in an NSF CAREER project awarded to test and refine Projective Reflection (PR) as a theoretical and methodological framework for facilitating learning as identity exploration in virtual learning environments. PR structured the design, implementation, and refinement of Virtual City Planning, a play-based course that included identity exploration experiences mediated by a virtual learning environment (Philadelphia Land Science), and classroom experiences designed to augment the virtual learning experience. In this paper, Quantitative Ethnography techniques were applied to visualize and interpret changes at the group level (N = 20) for the first of three iterations of Virtual City Planning, as a result of exploring role-possible selves of an environmental scientist and urban planner. Changes were reflected in students’ knowledge, interest and valuing, patterns of self-organization and self-control, and self-perceptions and self-definitions (KIVSSSS) in relation to the roles explored from the start of Virtual City Planning (starting self), during (exploring role-specific possible selves), and at the end of the play-based learning experience (new self).

Keywords

Identity exploration Epistemic network analysis Projective reflection Virtual learning environments Game-based learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Oyserman, D: Identity-based motivation. In: Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R. (eds.) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, pp. 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryu, D., Jeong, J.: Two faces of today’s learners: multiple identity formation. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57(6), 1351–1375 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster, A.: Games and motivation to learn science: personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 19(4), 597–614 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Squire, K.D., DeVane, B., Durga, S.: Designing centers of expertise for academic learning through video games. Theor. Pract. 47(3), 240–251 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Honey, M.A., Hilton, M. (eds.): Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ. 46(3), 223–234 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chee, Y.S.: Embodiment, embeddedness, and experience: game-based learning and the construction of identity. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 2(1), 3–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fraser, J., Shane-Simpson, C., Asbell-Clarke, J.: Youth science identity, science learning, and gaming experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 523–532 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    All, A., Castellar, E.P.N., Van Looy, J.: Assessing the effectiveness of digital game-based learning: best practices. Comput. Educ. 92, 90–103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beier, M.E., Miller, L.M., Wang, S.: Science games and the development of scientific possible selves. Cult. Sci. Edu. 7(4), 963–978 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foster, A.: CAREER: projective reflection: learning as identity exploration within games for science. National Science Foundation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Terry, L.: What knowledge is of most worth: teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ. 29(4), 127–140 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S.: Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 68–81 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1934/1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaplan, A., Flum, H.: Identity formation in educational settings: a critical focus for education in the 21st century. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 37(3), 171–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hidi, S., Renninger, K.A.: The four-phase model of interest development. Educ. Psychol. 41(2), 111–127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadwin, A., Oshige, M.: Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teach. Coll. Rec. 113(2), 240–264 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81(3), 329–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaplan, A., Sinai, M., Flum, H.: Design-based interventions for promoting students’ identity exploration within the school curriculum. In: Karabenick, S.A., Urdan, T.C. (eds.) Motivational Interventions: Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 18, pp. 243–291. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L.: Design experiments in educational research. Educ. Res. 32(1), 9–13 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foster, A., Shah, M.: The play curricular activity reflection and discussion model for game-based learning. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 47(2), 71–88 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marquart, C.L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic Network Analysis [Software]. http://app.epistemicnetwork.org. Accessed 28 Aug 2019
  26. 26.
    Stake, R.E.: The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeVane, B.M.: Toward sociocultural design tools for digital learning environments: understanding identity in game-based learning communities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wise, A.F., Shaffer, D.W.: Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. J. Learn. Anal. 2(2), 5–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: SENS: network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 562–577 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elsevier Inc.PhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations