Advertisement

Examining Identity Exploration in a Video Game Participatory Culture

  • Amanda BaranyEmail author
  • Aroutis Foster
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1112)

Abstract

To adapt to the needs of a 21st century context, educational researchers and practitioners could benefit from leveraging the potential of virtual learning environments such as games and the participatory cultures that surround them to support learning as a transformational and intentional process of identity exploration. This research offers a theoretically-comprehensive look into how a participant in an online game community forum engaged in identity exploration processes. Publicly-available longitudinal data was downloaded from Kerbal Space Program (KSP) players, which informed the development of an illustrative case study selected to elucidate how individual processes of identity exploration manifest. Lines of player data were deductively coded as representative of identity exploration and visualized using Epistemic Network Analysis to represent shifts in integration of identity constructs over time. Findings suggest that player participation in the community forum can support statistically significant identity change and highlight future areas of research in this field.

Keywords

Identity exploration Video games Informal learning Epistemic Network Analysis Case study 

References

  1. 1.
    Collins, A., Halverson, R.: The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(1), 18–27 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., Robison, A.J.: Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. MacArthur, Cambridge, MA (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gee, J.P.: Affinity spaces: how young people live and learn online and out of school. Phi Delta Kappan 99(6), 8–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaffer, D.W.: How Computer Games Help Children Learn. Macmillan Publishers, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Department of Education: Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update. Office of Educational Technology, Washington, DC (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., Yuhnke, B.: NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. The New Media Consortium, Austin (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan, A., Sinai, M., Flum, H.: Design-based interventions for promoting students’ identity exploration within the school curriculum. In: Karabenick, S.A., Urdan, T.C. (eds.) Motivational Interventions: Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 18, pp. 243–291. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan, A., Garner, J.K.: A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Dev. Psychol. 53(11), 2036–2051 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bagley, E.A., Shaffer, D.W.: Stop talking and type: comparing virtual and face-to-face mentoring in an epistemic game. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31(6), 606–622 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flum, H., Kaplan, A.: Identity formation in educational settings: a contextualized view of theory and research in practice. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 37(3), 240–245 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah, M., Foster, A., Barany, A.: Facilitating learning as identity change through game-based learning. In: Baek, Y. (ed.) Game-Based Learning: Theory. Strategies and Performance Outcomes. Nova Publishers, New York, NY (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foster, A.: CAREER: projective reflection: learning as identity exploration within games for science. National Science Foundation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Terry, L.: What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. J. Digit. Learn. Teacher Educ. 29(4), 127–140 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S.: Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 68–81 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1934/1986)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaplan, A., Flum, H.: Identity formation in educational settings: a critical focus for education in the 21st century. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 37(3), 171–175 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    About Kerbal Space Program. www.kerbalspaceprogram.com/en/page_id=7. Accessed 31 July 2018
  18. 18.
    Stake, R.E.: The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marquart, C.L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic Network Analysis, Version 0.1.0. http://app.epistemicnetwork.org, last accessed 2019/05/10
  22. 22.
    Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Analytics 4(3), 123–139 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations