Advertisement

The Impact of Mobility Speed over Varying Radio Propagation Models Using Routing Protocol in MANET

  • Mahmood Khan
  • Muhammad Faran Majeed
  • Amjad Mehmood
  • Khalid Saeed
  • Jaime LloretEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 92)

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is temporary network shaped for a particular function such as transferring data from one node to another that can change locations dynamically without any network architecture. This paper primarily focuses on three propagation models used in mobile ad hoc network. These propagation models are examined and evaluated through changing mobility and traffic parameters. The results of varying radio models are analyzed over DSDV (Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector) routing protocol. The simulation is carried out using Network Simulator-2 in terms of average network delay, delivery ratio, throughput, and packet drop ratio over mobility parameter speed. The results show that these three models perform differently by using same traffic and mobility factors. The research reveals that the effect of varying mobility speed has more impact on the throughput of all the models especially Shadowing and Two Ray models. However, Shadowing model shows better data sending ratio at higher mobility speed than other models. Shadowing model tends to show longer and consistent average delay and drop more data packets than other models at high mobility speed.

Keywords

MANET Propagation models DSDV Random WayPoint NS-2 Mobility speed 

References

  1. 1.
    Rattan, K., Patel, R.B.: Mobile ad hoc networks: challenges and future. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Challenges and Opportunities in Information Technology, RIMT, Gobindgarh, Punjab, India, pp. 133–135 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park, V.D., Corson, M.S.: A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithms for mobile wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, pp. 1405–1413 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perkins, C.E., Bhagwat, P.: Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers, pp. 234–244. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khider, I., Wang, F., Yin, W., Sacko: The impact of different radio propagation models for mobile ad-hoc networks (MANET) in urban area environment. World Journal of Modeling and Simulation ISSN 1 746-7233, England, UK. 5, pp. 45–52 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Usop, N.S.M., Abdullah, A., Abidin, A.F.A.: Performance evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR routing protocol in grid environment. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. (IJCSNS) 9(7), 261–268 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eenennaam-van, M.E.: A survey of propagation models used in vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) research. Design and Analysis of Communication Systems group, Faculty of EEMCS, University of Twente, Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shah, S., Khandre, A., Shirole, M., Bhole, G.: Performance evaluation of ad hoc routing protocols using NS2 simulation. Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Mumbai, India. Mobile and Pervasive Computing (CoMPC) (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Divecha, B., Abraham, A., Grosan, C., Sanyal, S.: Analysis of dynamic source routing and destination-sequenced distance-vector protocols for different mobility models. In: Proceedings of the First Asia International Conference on Modeling & Simulation (AMS 2007), pp. 224–229. IEEE 0-7695-2845-7/07 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Muktadir, H.A.: Energy consumption study of OLSR and DYMO MANET routing protocols in urban area. In: National Conference on Communication and Information Security (NCCIS). Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gauthier, V., De-Rasse, R., Marot, M., Becker, M.: On a comparison of four ad-hoc routing protocols when taking into account the radio interferences. In: 3rd International Working Conference on Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks (HET’NETs 2005), England (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruber, I., Knauf, O., Li, H.: Performance of ad hoc routing protocols in urban environments. Lehrstuhl für Kommunikationsnetze Technische Universität München, Siemens AG Information Communication Mobile (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camp, T., Boleng, J., Davies, V.: A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Department of Math and Computer Sciences Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483–502 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Majeed, M.F., Ahmed, S.H., Dailey, M.N.: Enabling push-based critical data forwarding in vehicular named data networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21(4), 873–876 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan, M., Majeed, M.F., Muhammad, S.: Evaluating radio propagation models using destination-sequenced distance-vector protocol for MANETs. Bahria Univ. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. (BUJICT) 10(1) (2017) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garcia, M., Catalá, A., Lloret, J., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: A wireless sensor network for soccer team monitoring. In: International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS 2011), Barcelona, Spain, 27–29 June 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Catala, A., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: A group-based wireless body sensors network using energy harvesting for soccer team monitoring. IJSNet 21(4), 208–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ullah, I., Shah, M.A., Wahid, A., Mehmood, A., Song, H.: ESOT: a new privacy model for preserving location privacy in internet of things. Telecommun. Syst. 67(4), 553–575 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, Z., Mehmood, A., Shu, L., Huo, Z., Zhang, Y., Mukherjee, M.: A survey on fault diagnosis in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 6, 11349–11364 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehmood, A., Alrajeh, N., Mukherjee, M., Abdullah, S., Song, H.: A survey on proactive, active and passive fault diagnosis protocols for WSNs: network operation perspective. Sensors 18(6), 1787 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lloret, J., López, J.J., Turró, C., Flores, S.: A fast design model for indoor radio coverage in the 2.4 GHz wireless LAN. In: 1st IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, pp. 408–412 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sendra, S., Fernandez, P., Turro, C., Lloret, J.: IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n indoor coverage and performance comparison. In: 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC 2010), Athens, Greece, 28 June 2020–02 July 2020 (2020)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghafoor, K.Z., Abu Bakar, K., Lloret, J., Khokhar, R.H., Lee, K.C.: Intelligent beaconless geographical forwarding for urban vehicular environments. Wirel. Netw. 19(3), 345–362 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmood Khan
    • 1
  • Muhammad Faran Majeed
    • 1
  • Amjad Mehmood
    • 2
  • Khalid Saeed
    • 1
  • Jaime Lloret
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceShaheed Benazir Bhutto University SheringalSheringalPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of ComputingKohat University of Science and TechnologyKohatPakistan
  3. 3.Integrated Management Coastal Research InstitutePolytechnic University of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations