Advertisement

Estimation of the Best Measuring Time for the Environmental Parameters of a Low-Cost Meteorology Monitoring System

  • Laura García
  • Lorena Parra
  • Jose M. Jimenez
  • Jaime LloretEmail author
  • Pascal Lorenz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 92)

Abstract

Meteorology monitoring is crucial for implementing smart agriculture systems. These systems should employ as few power as possible in order to avoid workers going to the fields to replace batteries. Thus, the collection and forwarding of data should be reduced as much as possible. However, the time interval to be employed should be large enough for the data to be accurate and so as to avoid data loss. In this paper, we examine different time intervals for data acquisition utilizing our proposed algorithm for our low-cost meteorology monitoring system. Real data has been analyzed with time intervals from 5 to 60 min. Results that the best time interval is 25 min for temperature, 45 min for humidity and 5 min for light.

Keywords

Precision agriculture ESP32 Algorithm Low-cost Decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by European Union through the ERANETMED (Euromediterranean Cooperation through ERANET joint activities and beyond) project ERANETMED3-227 SMARTWATIR.

References

  1. 1.
    Population. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/population/index.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2019
  2. 2.
    Cambra, C., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., García, L. An IoT service-oriented system for agriculture monitoring. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communication (ICC), Paris, France, 21–25 May 2017, pp. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: Emerging technologies for smart devices. Netw. Protoc. Algorithms 5, 28–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karim, L., Anpalagan, A., Nasser, N., Almhana, J.: Sensor-based M2M agriculture monitoring systems for developing countries: state and challenges. Netw. Protoc. Algorithms 5, 68–86 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    García, L., Parra, L., Jimenez, J.M., Lloret, J., Lorenz, P.: Practical design of a WSN to monitor the crop and its irrigation system. Netw. Protoc. Algorithms 10, 35–52 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mesas-Carrascosa, F.J., Verdú Santano, D., Meroño, J.E., Sánchez de la Orden, M., García-Ferrer, A.: Open source hardware to monitor environmental parameters in precision agriculture. Biosyst. Eng. 137, 73–83 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saini, H., Thakur, A., Ahuja, S., Sabharwal, N., Kumar, N.: Arduino based automatic wireless weather station with remote graphical application and alerts. In: 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks, Noida, India, 11–12 February 2016, pp. 605–609 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN.2016.7566768
  8. 8.
    Baker, T., Asim, M., Tawfik, H., Aldawsari, B., Buyya, R.: An energy-aware service composition algorithm for multiple cloud-based IoT applications. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 89, 96–108 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sodhro, A.H., Sangaiah, A.K., Sodhro, G.H., Lohano, S., Pirbhulal, S.: An energy-efficient algorithm for wearable electrocardiogram signal processing in ubiquitous healthcare applications. Sensors 18, 923 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura García
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lorena Parra
    • 1
  • Jose M. Jimenez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jaime Lloret
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pascal Lorenz
    • 2
  1. 1.Integrated Management Coastal Research InstituteUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Network and Telecommunication Research GroupUniversity of Haute AlsaceColmarFrance

Personalised recommendations